<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">imi</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Международная аналитика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Journal of International Analytics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-8476</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9633</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MGIMO University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46272/2587-8476-2016-0-1-52-61</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">imi-111</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>«ЖЕСТКАЯ СИЛА»: ВНОВЬ НА ПОВЕСТКЕ ДНЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>“HARD POWER”: BACK TO THE AGENDA</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Несет ли угрозу национальной безопасности России американская программа «молниеносного глобального удара»?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Does the US program of Conventional Prompt Global Strike threaten Russian national security?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Зведре</surname><given-names>Е. К.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Zvedre</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ст. науч. сотр. </p><p>119454, Москва, просп. Вернадского, 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Senior Researcher</p><p>119454, 76 Vernadsky Ave., Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">e.zvedre@inno.mgimo.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Центр евро-атлантической безопасности, Институт международных исследований МГИМО МИД России<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Institute of International Studies, MGIMO-University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>52</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Зведре Е.К., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Зведре Е.К.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zvedre E.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/111">https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/111</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматривается концепция «неядерного быстрого глобального удара» (НГБУ), основанная на точечном применении неядерных средств дальнего радиуса действия в любой точке земного шара в течение 60 минут. С окончанием «холодной войны» руководство США взяло курс на создание систем оружия, дающих возможность реагировать на новые угрозы точечно, без применения ядерного оружия, уменьшая опору на «традиционную» триаду стратегических ядерных сил. Работая над конкретными проектами в данной области, Пентагон продвигается по двум основным направлениям: использование для целей НГБУ стратегических баллистических ракет наземного и морского базирования в неядерном оснащении и создание новых, гиперзвуковых носителей, обладающих способностью маневрировать в атмосфере. В России серьезно воспринимаются планы США по созданию потенциала НГБУ, относят их к числу основных внешних военных угроз, имеющих целью нарушить стратегический баланс, поскольку их реализация ведет к созданию систем, по своим ударным возможностям приближающихся к стратегическим наступательным вооружениям и способных нанести обезоруживающий удар по СЯС РФ. Продолжение работ по созданию средств НГБУ, категорическое нежелание США идти на юридические договоренности, снимающие озабоченности России, здесь рассматривается в качестве одного из главных препятствий дальнейшему взаимодействию с США в стратегической области, подготовке новых шагов по сокращению СНВ.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article analyses a concept of Conventional Prompt Global Strike aimed at developing weapons systems that can deliver a conventional warhead anywhere in the world within an hour as a prioritized part of the US military strategy. The Pentagon planners believe that deployment of CPGS weapon would allow a selective and far more effective response to post-cold war threats, such as international terrorist networks, “rogue states” and other adversaries, thus drastically reducing reliance on nuclear deterrent in a number of situations. Over the years the Pentagon’s R&amp;D activities in this area encompassed numerous established and emerging weapon technologies, including use of surface-launched and sea-launched strategic missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles. The CPGS program is raising serious concerns in Moscow, where Russian officials consider it as a threat to Russia’s strategic nuclear arsenals and national security interests alongside with the US plans to develop and deploy global ballistic missile defense capabilities and attack weapons in space. Moscow predicts it could undermine strategic balance and trigger a nonnuclear arms race.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>неядерный быстрый глобальный удар</kwd><kwd>новые угрозы международной безопасности</kwd><kwd>межконтинентальные баллистические ракеты</kwd><kwd>гиперзвуковые планирующие боеголовки</kwd><kwd>угроза ядерному потенциалу России</kwd><kwd>поддержание стратегического баланса</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Conventional Prompt Global Strike (CPGS)</kwd><kwd>post Cold War international security</kwd><kwd>intercontinental ballistic missiles</kwd><kwd>sea-launched ballistic missiles</kwd><kwd>hypersonic boost-glide weapons</kwd><kwd>threat to Russian nuclear potential</kwd><kwd>maintaining strategic balance</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эктон Дж.М. Серебряная пуля? Правильные вопросы о неядерном быстром глобальном ударе / Пер. с англ. [рус. версия доклада] под ред. Е. Мясникова. – М.: Московский центр Карнеги, 2014.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Эктон Дж.М. Серебряная пуля? Правильные вопросы о неядерном быстром глобальном ударе / Пер. с англ. [рус. версия доклада] под ред. Е. Мясникова. – М.: Московский центр Карнеги, 2014.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ford Ch. A. Conventional ‘Replacement’ of Nuclear Weapons? URL: http://www. newparadigmsforum.com/NPFtestsite/?p=546</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ford Ch. A. Conventional ‘Replacement’ of Nuclear Weapons? URL: http://www. newparadigmsforum.com/NPFtestsite/?p=546</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">National Research Council of the National Academies. U.S. Conventional Prompt Global Strike: Issues for 2008 and Beyond. – Washington, DC, August 2008. URL: http://www.nap.edu / read/12061/chapter/5#71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">National Research Council of the National Academies. U.S. Conventional Prompt Global Strike: Issues for 2008 and Beyond. – Washington, DC, August 2008. URL: http://www.nap.edu / read/12061/chapter/5#71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rumsfeld D. Foreford // U.S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report 2002. URL: http://fas.org/sgp/news/2002/01/npr-foreword.html</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rumsfeld D. Foreford // U.S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report 2002. URL: http://fas.org/sgp/news/2002/01/npr-foreword.html</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">U. S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report 2010. URL: http://www. defense. gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/NPR/2010_Nuclear_Posture_Review_Report.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">U. S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report 2010. URL: http://www. defense. gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/NPR/2010_Nuclear_Posture_Review_Report.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. – Washington, DC, January 2002. URL: http://www.comw.org/qdr/qdr2001.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. – Washington, DC, January 2002. URL: http://www.comw.org/qdr/qdr2001.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC, February 2006. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/dod/qdr-2006-report.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC, February 2006. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/dod/qdr-2006-report.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC, February 2010. URL: http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/1002QDR2010.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC, February 2010. URL: http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/1002QDR2010.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Woolf A. F. Conventional Warheads for Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues for Congress. URL: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/81935.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Woolf A. F. Conventional Warheads for Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues for Congress. URL: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/81935.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
