imiМеждународная аналитикаJournal of International Analytics2587-84762541-9633MGIMO University10.46272/2587-8476-2018-0-2-28-36imi-202Research ArticleСтатьиМеханизм принятия внешнеполитических решений в Китае: особенности реформирования в период после XVIII съезда КПКForeign Policy Decision-Making in China: Key Features of the Reforms since the 18th National Congress of the CPCДенисовИ. Е.DenisovI.

ст. науч. сотр. Центра исследований Восточной Азии и ШОС

Senior Research Fellow, Center for East Asian and Shanghai Cooperation Organization Studies

iedenisov@mail.ruИнститут международных исследований МГИМО МИД РоссииРоссияInstitute for International Studies, MGIMO UniversityRussian Federation201828062018022836Copyright © Денисов И.Е., 20182018Денисов И.Е.Denisov I.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/202

Дипломатия Си Цзиньпина базируется на определенных институциональных изменениях в процессе принятия внешнеполитических решений. В ноябре 2013 г. на 3-м пленуме ЦК КПК 18-го созыва был создан Совет государственной безопасности (СГБ). В настоящей статье выявляются мотивы, лежащие в основе данного решения, анализируются персональный состав и основные задачи СГБ. Автор статьи приходит к выводу, что в ходе дальнейшей эволюции Совета государственной безопасности нельзя исключать его трансформацию в институт, отвечающий за внешнюю политику и безопасность и имеющий двойной партийно-государственный статус. Этот шаг способен переформатировать структуру распределения власти в Китайской Народной Республике.

Xi Jinping’s diplomacy relies on certain institutional changes related to the foreign policy decision-making process. National Security Commission (NSC) was established at the 3rd Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee in November 2013. The paper analyzes the rationale behind this decision, personal composition and main tasks of the NSC. The author argues that further evolution of the National Security Commission does not exclude its transformation into a dual party-state institution in charge of foreign policy and national security. This move will reshape the structure of power distribution in PRC.

Китайвнешняя политикаСи Цзиньпинстратегиябезопасностьреформыпроцесс принятия решенийChinaforeign policyXi JinpingstrategysecurityreformsdecisionmakingReferencesДенисов И. Е. Внешняя политика Китая при Си Цзиньпине: преемственность и новаторство // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право. – 2017. – № 5. – С. 83–98.Cabestan J. P. China’s Institutional Changes in the Foreign and Security Policy Realm Under Xi Jinping: Power Concentration vs. Fragmentation Without Institutionalization. East Asia. 2017. Vol. 34. No. 2. P. 113–131.Cabestan J. P. China’s Institutional Changes in the Foreign and Security Policy Realm Under Xi Jinping: Power Concentration vs. Fragmentation Without Institutionalization // East Asia. – 2017. – Vol. 34. – No. 2. – P. 113–131.Denisov I. E.Vneshnyaya politika Kitaya pri Si Tszin'pine: preemstvennost' i novatorstvo [Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping: continuity and innovation]. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo.2017. No. 5. P. 83–98.DOI:10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-5-83-98Gore L. L. P.Rebuilding the Leninist Party Rule: Chinese Communist Party under Xi Jinping’s Stewardship // East Asian Policy. – 2016. – Vol. 8. – No. 1. – P. 5–15.Gore L. L. P.Rebuilding the Leninist Party Rule: Chinese Communist Party under Xi Jinping's Stewardship. East Asian Policy. 2016. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 5–15.Lampton D. M. China’s Foreign and National Security Policy-Making Process: Is It Changing, and Does It Matter? // The Making of Chinese Foreign and Security Policy in the Era of Reform, 1978–2000 / Edit. by D. M. Lampton. – Stanford University Press, 2001. – P. 1–36.Lampton D. M.China's foreign and national security policy-making process: Is it changing, and does it matter? In: The making of Chinese foreign and security policy in the era of reform, 1978–2000. Edit. by D. M. Lampton. Stanford University Press, 2001. P. 1–36.Mulrooney D. Rethinking National Security: China’s New Security Commission / Policy Brief , Institute for Security & Development Policy. No. 152. May 6, 2014. – URL: http://isdp.eu/content/uploads/images/stories/isdp-mainpdf/2014-mulrooney-rethinking-national-security-chinas-new-security-commission.pdfMulrooney D. Rethinking National Security: China’s New Security Commission. Policy Brief, Institute for Security & Development Policy. No. 152. May 6, 2014. URL: http://isdp.eu/content/uploads/images/stories/isdp-mainpdf/2014-mulrooney-rethinking-national-security-chinas-new-security-commission.pdfPoh A., Li M.A China in Transition: The Rhetoric and Substance of Chinese Foreign Policy Under Xi Jinping // Asian Security. – 2017. – Vol. 13. – No. 2. – P. 84–97.Poh A., Li M.A China in transition: The rhetoric and substance of Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. Asian Security. 2017. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 84–97.Rolland N.China’s Eurasian Century? Political and Strategic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative. – Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Asian Research, 2017.Rolland N.China’s Eurasian Century? Political and Strategic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative. National Bureau of Asian Research, 2017.Wang S. Xi Jinping’s Centralisation of Chinese Foreign Policy Decision-Making Power // East Asian Policy. – 2017. – Vol. 9. – No. 2. – P. 34–42.Wang S.Xi Jinping’s Centralisation of Chinese Foreign Policy Decision-Making Power. East Asian Policy. 2017. Vol. 9.No. 2. P. 34–42.Wuthnow J. China’s New “Black Box”: Problems and Prospects for the Central National Security Commission // The China Quarterly. – Vol. 232. December 2017. – P. 886–903.Wuthnow J.China's New “Black Box”: Problems and Prospects for the Central National Security Commission. The China Quarterly. Vol. 232. December 2017. P. 886–903.Yang J. China’s “New Diplomacy” under the Xi Jinping Administration // China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies. – 2015. – Vol. 1. – No. 1. – P. 1–17.Yang J.China's “New Diplomacy” under the Xi Jinping Administration. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies. 2015. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 1–17.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.