<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">imi</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Международная аналитика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Journal of International Analytics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-8476</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9633</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MGIMO University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-2-45-67</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">imi-281</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Меняющаяся властная иерархия Северо-Восточной Азии и стратегические интересы Китая в 2020е годы</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Shifting Power Structure of Northeast Asia and China’s Strategic Choices in the 2020s</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хуайгао</surname><given-names>Ци</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Huaigao</surname><given-names>Qi</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доцент, заместитель декана</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Associate Professor and Vice Dean</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">huaigaoqi@fudan.edu.cn</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кайшэн</surname><given-names>Ли</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kaisheng</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>научный сотрудник, заместитель директора</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Research Fellow and Vice Director</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">likaisheng@sass.org.cn</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Институт международных исследований Фуданьского университета<country>Китай</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Institute of International Studies at Fudan University<country>China</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru">Шанхайская академия социальных наук Института международных исследований<country>Китай</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Institute of International Studies at Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences<country>China</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>11</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>45</fpage><lpage>67</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Хуайгао Ц., Кайшэн Л., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Хуайгао Ц., Кайшэн Л.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Huaigao Q., Kaisheng L.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/281">https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/281</self-uri><abstract><p>Расклад сил в Северо-Восточной Азии (СВА) демонстрирует ослабление однополярности во главе с Соединенными Штатами (США), что приведет к появлению структуры с «многосторонним взаимодействием двух сверхдержав (Китая и США) и трёх региональных великих держав (Россия, Япония и Южная Корея)» в третьем десятилетии XXI века. В контексте изменения соотношения сил другие пять стран СВА будут менять дипломатическую политику. Япония, Россия и Южная Корея, занимающие второе место в раскладе сил СВА, будут стремиться преследовать региональные интересы. Россия будет бережно поддерживать равновесие в отношениях с Китаем и США и прагматично использовать инвестиции других стран СВА для развития своего дальневосточного региона. Япония будет стремиться получить от США максимальную гарантию безопасности, в то же время активно получая экономические выгоды от Китая, и постарается сохранить высокую гибкость в стратегическом выборе СВА. Южная Корея будет осуществлять «дипломатию двух сверхдержав» в отношении США и Китая для усиления своей стратегической автономии. Северная Корея и Монголия, занимающие третье место из-за их относительно слабой национальной мощи, будут стремиться к выживанию в режиме и национальной безопасности. Ожидается, что перечень стратегических выборов Китая для СВА в следующем десятилетии, вероятно, будет включать пять аспектов: во-первых, избежание «новой холодной войны» и достижение стратегического баланса с США; во-вторых, постоянное поддержание дружеского и тесного стратегического партнерства с Россией; в-третьих, активное содействие экономическому сотрудничеству с другими странами СВА; в-четвертых, содействие созданию регионального механизма безопасности, включающего все государства СВА, например, создание в будущем «Организации мира и сотрудничества в Северо-Восточной Азии»; в-пятых, построение коллективной идентичности в СВА.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The Northeast Asian (NEA) power structure demonstrates a weakening unipolarity of the United States (U.S.), which will evolve into a power structure with “multilateral co-opetition of two superpowers (China and the U.S.) and three regional great powers (Russia, Japan, and South Korea)” during the 2020s. In the context of this shifting power structure, the other fi ve NEA states will adjust their diplomatic policies. Japan, Russia, and South Korea, which occupy the second tier of the NEA power structure, will pursue regional great power diplomacy and regional interests. Russia will maintain a careful balance with China and the U.S., and will use investments from the other NEA states pragmatically to develop its Far East region. Japan will seek to maximize its security guarantees from the U.S. while actively obtaining economic benefi ts from China, and will try to remain fl exible in terms of its NEA strategic choice. South Korea will implement the so-called “two superpowers diplomacy” in relation to the U.S. and China in order to enhance its strategic autonomy. With relatively weak national power, North Korea and Mongolia occupy the third tier of the NEA power structure, and they will try to ensure the survival of their respective regimes and promote national security. China’s strategic choices for NEA in the next decade are likely to include fi ve aspects: 1) to avoid a “new Cold War” and achieve a strategic balance with the U.S.; 2) to maintain friendly and close strategic ties with Russia; 3) to actively promote economic cooperation with the other NEA countries; 4) to promote the establishment of a regional security mechanism in the future that includes all the NEA states, for example, a “Northeast Asia Peace and Cooperation Organization” (NEAPCO); and 5) to construct a collective NEA identity.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>Северо-Восточная Азия (СВА)</kwd><kwd>властная иерархия</kwd><kwd>стратегическая конкуренция КНР и США</kwd><kwd>стратегические решения</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Northeast Asia (NEA)</kwd><kwd>power structure</kwd><kwd>China–U.S. strategic competition</kwd><kwd>strategic choices</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cline, Ray S. World Power Assessment 1977: A Calculus of Strategic Drift. Boulder: Westview Press, 1977.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cline, Ray S. World Power Assessment 1977: A Calculus of Strategic Drift. Boulder: Westview Press, 1977.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hu, Angang, and Honghua Men.“Comparison of Tangible Strategic Resources amongChina, the U.S., Japan, Russia, and India.” Strategy andManagement, no. 2 (2002): 26–41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hu, Angang, and Honghua Men.“Comparison of Tangible Strategic Resources amongChina, the U.S., Japan, Russia, and India.” Strategy andManagement, no. 2 (2002): 26–41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Korolev, Alexander. “Systemic Balancing andRegional Hedging: China–Russia Relations.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9, no. 4 (2016): 375–97.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Korolev, Alexander. “Systemic Balancing andRegional Hedging: China–Russia Relations.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9, no. 4 (2016): 375–97.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Qi, Huaigao. “Seventy Years of China’s MultilateralDiplomacy toward Neighboring Countries: DevelopingProcesses, Main Characters and Challenges,” WorldEconomics and Politics, no. 6 (June 2019) (b): 43–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Qi, Huaigao. “Seventy Years of China’s MultilateralDiplomacy toward Neighboring Countries: DevelopingProcesses, Main Characters and Challenges,” WorldEconomics and Politics, no. 6 (June 2019) (b): 43–64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Security Cooperation Mechanism in Northeast Asia.Beijing: Current Aff airs Press, 2006.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Security Cooperation Mechanism in Northeast Asia.Beijing: Current Aff airs Press, 2006.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Singer, David, Stuart Bremer, and John Stuckey.“Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major PowerWar, 1820-1965.” In Peace, War, and Numbers, editedby Bruce Russet, 19–48. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1972.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Singer, David, Stuart Bremer, and John Stuckey.“Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major PowerWar, 1820-1965.” In Peace, War, and Numbers, editedby Bruce Russet, 19–48. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1972.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ulambayar, D. “Northeast Asian Security Issues andMongolia’s ‘Third Neighbor’ Policy,” ERINA Report, no. 114 (November 2013): 47–50.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ulambayar, D. “Northeast Asian Security Issues andMongolia’s ‘Third Neighbor’ Policy,” ERINA Report, no. 114 (November 2013): 47–50.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
