imiМеждународная аналитикаJournal of International Analytics2587-84762541-9633MGIMO University10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-1-35-54imi-310Research ArticleИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИRESEARCH ARTICLESДихотомия «Европа – Россия» как изобретенная традиция современного грузинского национализмаThe “Europe – Russia” Dichotomy as an Invented Tradition of Modern Georgian Nationalismhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3819-3103КирчановМ. В.KyrchanovM. W.

Максим Валерьевич Кирчанов, д.ист.н., доцент кафедры регионоведения и экономики зарубежных стран Факультета международных отношений

394018, Воронеж, Университетская площадь, 1

Maksym W. Kyrchanov, PhD in History, Associate Professor, Department of Regional Studies and Foreign Countries Economies, Faculty of International Relations

1, Universitetskaya Square, Voronezh, 394018

maksymkyrchanoff@gmail.comВоронежский государственный университетРоссияVoronezh State UniversityRussian Federation2021100220211213554Copyright © Кирчанов М.В., 20212021Кирчанов М.В.Kyrchanov M.W.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/310

Автор анализирует особенности интеллектуальной и идеологической легитимации европейской политики современных элит Грузии. Предполагается, что интеллектуалы являются основными вдохновителями и инициаторами формирования и развития европейского измерения в грузинской национальной идентичности. Автор анализирует трансформацию дихотомии «Европа – Россия» в современном грузинском интеллектуальном дискурсе. Анализируются стратегии и формы позитивной и негативной идеологизации Запада и России. Показана зависимость интеллектуалов как от политического класса, так и от актуальной идеологической конъюнктуры и ситуации. Автор полагает, что гипертрофированная роль европейских и российских образов в грузинском националистическом дискурсе и политическом воображении стала следствием веры элит и интеллектуалов в коллективный Запад как альтернативу российскому влиянию. Автор анализирует основные стратегии формирования положительного образа Европы в грузинском интеллектуальном дискурсе, полагая, что развитие европейских мотивов и образов несколькими поколениями грузинских интеллектуалов привело к возникновению уникального грузинского европеизма и концепта грузинской нации как «нетипичных европейцев». Развитие европейских образов зависит от формирования и продвижения образа России как универсального Другого. Предполагается, что негативная мифологизация России стала результатом исторической травмы: утраты государственности, вынужденной истории Грузии в Российской империи и СССР, а также неудачами в российско-грузинской внешнеполитической конкуренции в постсоветский период. В целом автор полагает, что российские и европейские нарративы стали изобретенными традициями грузинской идентичности, которые влияют на стратегии элит во внешней политике Грузии.

In the article, the author analyzes the transformation of the dichotomy “Europe – Russia” in contemporary Georgian intellectual discourse as well as strategies and forms of positive and negative ideologization of the West and Russia. We state that the hypertrophied role of European and Russian images in the Georgian discourse has resulted from the belief of elites in the collective West as an alternative to Russian infl uence. We analyze the main strategies of forming a positive image of Europe in Georgian intellectual discourse, believing that the development of European motifs and images by several generations of Georgian intellectuals led to the emergence of a unique Georgian Europeanism and the concept of the “Non Typical European” Georgian nation. The development of European images depends on the formation and promotion of the image of Russia as a universal Other. It is assumed that the negative mythologization of Russia resulted from the historical trauma of the loss of statehood, Georgia’s forced history in the Russian Empire and the USSR, as well as the failures in the Russian-Georgian relations in the post-Soviet period. Overall, the author believes that Russian and European narratives have become invented traditions of Georgian identity that infl uence the strategies of elites in Georgian foreign policy.

Грузиянационализмидентичность«атипичная европейскость»политическое воображениеЗападРоссияGeorgianationalismintellectualsidentity“Non Typical Europeanness”political imaginationWestEuropeRussiaReferencesАйвазян, А. Грузия: внешняя политика малого государства // Современная Европа. – 2020. – № 1. – С. 80–90.Ayvazyan, A. “Georgia: Foreign Policy of a Small State” [Gruziya: vneshnyaya politika malogo gosudarstva] Modern Europe, no. 1 (2020): 80–90 [In Russian].Айвазян, А. Политика ЕС в странах Южного Кавказа: пересмотр политики соседства // Современная Европа. – 2016. – № 4. – С. 47–56. [Ayvazyan, A. “EU policy in the South Caucasus: revising the neighborhood policy”.Ayvazyan, A. “EU policy in the South Caucasus: revising the neighborhood policy” [Politika ES v stranakh Yuzhnogo Kavkaza: peresmotr politiki sosedstva] Modern Europe, no. 4 (2016): 47–56 [In Russian].Болгова, И. «Восточное партнёрство»: неоднозначные результаты // Современная Европа. – 2016. – № 6. – С. 63–71.Bolgova, I. “Eastern Partnership”: ambiguous results [“Vostochnoe partnorstvo”: neodnoznachnyye rezul'taty] Modern Europe, no. 6 (2016): 63–71 [In Russian].Исхаков, С. История народов Поволжья и Урала: проблемы и перспективы «национализации» // Национальные истории в советском и постсоветских государствах / ред. К. Аймермахер, Г. Бордюгов; предисл. Ф. Бомсдорфа. – М.: Фонд Фридриха Науманна, АИРО-ХХ, 2003. – С. 273–295.Iskhakov, S. “History of the peoples of the Volga region and the Urals: problems and prospects of ‘nationalization’” [“Istoriya narodov Povolzh'ya i Urala: problemy i perspektivy ‘natsionalizatsii’”]. In National Histories In The Soviet And Post-Soviet States, edited by K. Aymermacher, and G. Bordyugov, 273–295. Moscow: Friedrich Naumann. Foundation, 2003 [In Russian].Кирчанов, М.В. Грузинские интеллектуалы: профиль сообщества // Российский журнал исследований национализма. – 2020. – № 1. – С. 58–102.Kirchanov, M.V. “Georgian Intellectuals: Community Profi le” [Gruzinskiye intellektualy: profi l’ soobshchestva]. Russian Journal of Nationalism Studies, no. 1 (2020): 58–102 [In Russian].Копосов, Н. Исторические понятия в мире без будущего // Как мы пишем историю / отв. ред. Г. Гаррета, Г. Дюфо, Л. Пименова. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2013. – С. 57–93.Koposov, N. “Historical Concepts In A World Without A Future” [Istoricheskiye ponyatiya v mire bez budushchego] In How We Write History, edited by G. Garretta, G. Dufout, L. Pimenova, 57–93. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2013 [In Russian].Кром М. Использование понятий в исследованиях по истории допетровской Руси: смена вех и новые ориентиры // Как мы пишем историю / отв. ред. Г. Гаррета, Г. Дюфо, Л. Пименова. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2013. – С. 94–125.КKrom, M. “The use of concepts in research on the history of pre-Petrine Russia: a change in milestone sand new landmarks” [Ispol'zovaniye ponyatiy v issledovaniyakh po istorii dopetrovskoy Rusi: smena vekh i novyye oriyentiry]. In How We Write History, edited by G. Garretta, G. Dufout, L. Pimenova, 94–125. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2013 [In Russian].Кушко, А., Таки, В. “Кто мы?” Историографический выбор: румынская нация или молдавская государственность // Ab Imperio. – 2003 – № 1. – C. 485–495.Cusco, A., Taki, V. “Who Are We?» Historiographic Choice: The Romanian Nation Or The Moldovan Statehood” [“Kto my?” Istoriografi cheskiy vybor: rumynskaya natsiya ili moldavskaya gosudarstvennost’] Ab Imperio, no. 1 (2003): 485–495 [In Russian].Сихарулидзе, А. Россия как фактор внутренней политики Грузии // Центральная Евразия. – 2019. – № 1. – С. 135–153. [Sikharulidze, A. “Russia as a Factor in Georgia’s Domestic Policy.”Sikharulidze, A. “Russia as a Factor in Georgia’s Domestic Policy.” [Rossiya kak factor vnutrennei politiki Gruzii] Central Asia, no. 1 (2019): 135–153 [In Russian].Усманова, Д. Создавая национальную историю татар: историографические и интеллектуальные дебаты на рубеже веков // Ab Imperio. – 2003. – № 3. – С. 337–360. [Usmanova, D. “Creating the National History of the Tatars: Historiographic and Intellectual Debates at the Turn of the Century”Usmanova, D. “Creating the National History of the Tatars: Historiographic and Intellectual Debates at the Turn of the Century” [Sozdavaya natsional'nuyu istoriyu tatar: istoriografi cheskiye i intellektual'nyye debaty na rubezhe vekov] Ab Imperio, no. 3 (2003): 337–360 [In Russian].Колесник, І. “Український Історик І Влада: Від Примусу До Партнерства” [Ukrainian Historian And Government: From Coercion To Partnership] Ейдос, no. 9 (2017): 9–24 [In Ukrainian].Колесник, І. “Український Історик І Влада: Від Примусу До Партнерства” [Ukrainian Historian And Government: From Coercion To Partnership] Ейдос, no. 9 (2017): 9–24 [In Ukrainian].Ластоўскі, А. “Прапрацоўка камуністычнага мінулага ў Славакіі: асноўныя фактары і дынаміка” [Studying the communist past in Slovakia: the main factors and dynamics]. Палітычная сфера, no. 24 (2016): 37–55 [In Belarusian].Ластоўскі, А. “Прапрацоўка камуністычнага мінулага ў Славакіі: асноўныя фактары і дынаміка” [Studying the communist past in Slovakia: the main factors and dynamics]. Палітычная сфера, no. 24 (2016): 37–55 [In Belarusian].Сагановіч, Г. “Беларуская гістарыяграфія ў ацэнках яе гісторыкаў” [Belarusian historiography in the assessments of its historians]. Беларускі Гістарычны Агляд 17, no. 1–2 (2010): 225–229 [In Belarusian].Сагановіч, Г. “Беларуская гістарыяграфія ў ацэнках яе гісторыкаў” [Belarusian historiography in the assessments of its historians]. Беларускі Гістарычны Агляд 17, no. 1–2 (2010): 225–229 [In Belarusian].Сагановіч, Г. “Танэнберг / Грунвальд / Дуброўна 1410: сімвалізацыя бітвы ў Беларусі” [Tannenberg / Grunwald / Dubrovno 1410: symbolization of the battle in Belarus]. Беларускі Гістарычны Агляд 17, no. 1–2 (2010): 89–116 [In Belarusian].Сагановіч, Г. “Танэнберг / Грунвальд / Дуброўна 1410: сімвалізацыя бітвы ў Беларусі” [Tannenberg / Grunwald / Dubrovno 1410: symbolization of the battle in Belarus]. Беларускі Гістарычны Агляд 17, no. 1–2 (2010): 89–116 [In Belarusian].დავითაშვილი, ზ. ნაციონალიზმი დგ ლობალიზაცია [Nationalism and Globalization]. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 2003 [In Georgian].დავითაშვილი, ზ. ნაციონალიზმი დგ ლობალიზაცია [Nationalism and Globalization]. Tbilisi: Metsniereba, 2003 [In Georgian].იდენტობა და ნაციონალიზმი [Identity and Nationalism], edited by თ. ქარელი. Tbilisi: Akhali Azri, 2009 [In Georgian].იდენტობა და ნაციონალიზმი [Identity and Nationalism], edited by თ. ქარელი. Tbilisi: Akhali Azri, 2009 [In Georgian].მაღლაფერიძე, თ. მარადიაწმყო: ნარკვევები ქართულ მწერლობასა და ინტელიგენციაზე [Eternal Present: Essays on Georgian Literature and the Intelligence], edited by რ. სირაძე. Tbilisi: Universal, 2005 [In Georgian].მაღლაფერიძე, თ. მარადიაწმყო: ნარკვევები ქართულ მწერლობასა და ინტელიგენციაზე [Eternal Present: Essays on Georgian Literature and the Intelligence], edited by რ. სირაძე. Tbilisi: Universal, 2005 [In Georgian].სახელმწიფოებრიობა და უსაფრთხოება: საქართველო “ვარდების რევოლუციის” შემდეგ [Statehood and Security: Georgia after the Rose Revolution], edited by ბ. კოპიტერსის, რ. ლეგვოლდის. Tbilisi: American Acad. Peace, Democracy and Development. Kavk. In-ti, 2006 [In Georgian].სახელმწიფოებრიობა და უსაფრთხოება: საქართველო “ვარდების რევოლუციის” შემდეგ [Statehood and Security: Georgia after the Rose Revolution], edited by ბ. კოპიტერსის, რ. ლეგვოლდის. Tbilisi: American Acad. Peace, Democracy and Development. Kavk. In-ti, 2006 [In Georgian].ქართული და ევროპული იდენტობის საკითხები [Issues of Georgian and European Identity], edited by ქ. კაკიტელაშვილი. Tbilisi, 2012 [In Georgian].ქართული და ევროპული იდენტობის საკითხები [Issues of Georgian and European Identity], edited by ქ. კაკიტელაშვილი. Tbilisi, 2012 [In Georgian].შუბითიძე, ვ. ევროპეიზაცია და ქართული პოლიტიკური აზროვნება (საქართველოს ევროპული იდენტობა) [Europeanization and Georgian Political Thinking (Georgia’s European Identity)]. Tbilisi: Tech. Un-ti, 2013 [In Georgian].შუბითიძე, ვ. ევროპეიზაცია და ქართული პოლიტიკური აზროვნება (საქართველოს ევროპული იდენტობა) [Europeanization and Georgian Political Thinking (Georgia’s European Identity)]. Tbilisi: Tech. Un-ti, 2013 [In Georgian].ჩხაიძე, ი. ნაციონალიზმის მოდერნისტული თეორია და ქართული ნაციონალური პროექტი (“თერგდალეულები”) [The Modernist Theory of Nationalism and the Georgian National Project (“Tergdaleuli”)], edited by ნ. ჩიქოვანი. Tbilisi: Akhali Azri, 2009 [In Georgian].ჩხაიძე, ი. ნაციონალიზმის მოდერნისტული თეორია და ქართული ნაციონალური პროექტი (“თერგდალეულები”) [The Modernist Theory of Nationalism and the Georgian National Project (“Tergdaleuli”)], edited by ნ. ჩიქოვანი. Tbilisi: Akhali Azri, 2009 [In Georgian].Chitaladze, A., and T. Grigoryan. “Understanding Europeanization in Georgia and Armenia-Discourses, Perceptions and the Impact on Bilateral Relations.” Analytical Bulletin 8, (2015): 29–54.Chitaladze, A., and T. Grigoryan. “Understanding Europeanization in Georgia and Armenia-Discourses, Perceptions and the Impact on Bilateral Relations.” Analytical Bulletin 8, (2015): 29–54.Coakley, John. “Mobilizing Past: Nationalist Images of History.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 10, no. 4 (2004): 531–560.Coakley, John. “Mobilizing Past: Nationalist Images of History.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 10, no. 4 (2004): 531–560.Delcour, Laure. “Armenia’s and Georgia’s Contrasted Positioning Vis-à-Vis the EU: Between Vocal Centrality and Strategic Marginality.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 27, no. 4 (October 2, 2019): 439–50. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2019.1608815.Delcour, Laure. “Armenia’s and Georgia’s Contrasted Positioning Vis-à-Vis the EU: Between Vocal Centrality and Strategic Marginality.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 27, no. 4 (October 2, 2019): 439–50. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2019.1608815.Kabachnik, Peter. “The Power of Place, or Powerless Places? Hybrid Attitudes towards Soviet Symbols in Post-Soviet Georgia.” Central Asian Survey 37, no. 2 (April 3, 2018): 265–85. doi:10.1080/02634937.2018.1442320.Kabachnik, Peter. “The Power of Place, or Powerless Places? Hybrid Attitudes towards Soviet Symbols in Post-Soviet Georgia.” Central Asian Survey 37, no. 2 (April 3, 2018): 265–85. doi:10.1080/02634937.2018.1442320.Kirchanov, Maxim. “‘Europe’ and ‘the West’ in Georgia’s political imagination and nationalist discourse.” Central Asia and Caucasus. Journal of Social and Political Studies 11, no. 2 (2010): 158–167.Kirchanov, Maxim. “‘Europe’ and ‘the West’ in Georgia’s political imagination and nationalist discourse.” Central Asia and Caucasus. Journal of Social and Political Studies 11, no. 2 (2010): 158–167.Kovtiak, Elisabeth. “A Bridge to the Past: Public Memory and Nostalgia for the Communist Times in Modern Georgia.” Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics 12, no. 1 (July 30, 2018): 31–51. doi:10.2478/jnmlp-2018-0005.Kovtiak, Elisabeth. “A Bridge to the Past: Public Memory and Nostalgia for the Communist Times in Modern Georgia.” Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics 12, no. 1 (July 30, 2018): 31–51. doi:10.2478/jnmlp-2018-0005.Kyrchanoff , Maxim W. “Caucasian Prisoners, Or How Georgian Intellectuals Invent Traditions And (Re) Produce Meanings.” Journal of Frontier Studies 5, no. 3 (2020): 72–114.Kyrchanoff , Maxim W. “Caucasian Prisoners, Or How Georgian Intellectuals Invent Traditions And (Re) Produce Meanings.” Journal of Frontier Studies 5, no. 3 (2020): 72–114.Martí nez, Francisco. “To Whom Does History Belong?” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 26, no. 1 (March 1, 2017): 98–127. doi:10.3167/ajec.2017.260106.Martí nez, Francisco. “To Whom Does History Belong?” Anthropological Journal of European Cultures 26, no. 1 (March 1, 2017): 98–127. doi:10.3167/ajec.2017.260106.Metreveli, Tornike. “An Undisclosed Story of Roses: Church, State, and Nation in Contemporary Georgia.” Nationalities Papers 44, no. 5 (September 20, 2016): 694–712. doi:10.1080/00905992.2016.1200021.Metreveli, Tornike. “An Undisclosed Story of Roses: Church, State, and Nation in Contemporary Georgia.” Nationalities Papers 44, no. 5 (September 20, 2016): 694–712. doi:10.1080/00905992.2016.1200021.Beacháin, Donnacha Ó, and Frederik Coene. “Go West: Georgia’s European Identity and Its Role in Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy Objectives.” Nationalities Papers 42, no. 6 (November 20, 2014): 923–41. doi:10.1080/00905992.2014.953466.Beacháin, Donnacha Ó, and Frederik Coene. “Go West: Georgia’s European Identity and Its Role in Domestic Politics and Foreign Policy Objectives.” Nationalities Papers 42, no. 6 (November 20, 2014): 923–41. doi:10.1080/00905992.2014.953466.Said, Edward W. Orientalism. NY.: Pantheon Books, 1978.Said, Edward W. Orientalism. NY.: Pantheon Books, 1978.Shatirishvili, Zaza. “National Narratives and New Politics of Memory in Georgia.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 20, no. 2 (June 2009): 391–99. doi:10.1080/09592310902975513.Shatirishvili, Zaza. “National Narratives and New Politics of Memory in Georgia.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 20, no. 2 (June 2009): 391–99. doi:10.1080/09592310902975513.Sikharulidze, A. Т. “Georgia Beyond ‘Radical Europeanness’: Undiscovered Directions of Foreign Policy.” Journal of International Analytics 11, no. 2 (November 7, 2020): 91–108. doi:10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-2-91-108.Sikharulidze, A. Т. “Georgia Beyond ‘Radical Europeanness’: Undiscovered Directions of Foreign Policy.” Journal of International Analytics 11, no. 2 (November 7, 2020): 91–108. doi:10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-2-91-108.Tsuladze, Lia. “On Europeanisation, National Sentiments and Confused Identities in Georgia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50, no. 2 (June 1, 2017): 125–33. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.05.003.Tsuladze, Lia. “On Europeanisation, National Sentiments and Confused Identities in Georgia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 50, no. 2 (June 1, 2017): 125–33. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.05.003.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.