imiМеждународная аналитикаJournal of International Analytics2587-84762541-9633MGIMO University10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-4-137-146imi-320Research ArticleОБЗОРНЫЕ СТАТЬИRESEARCH ESSAYСмертоносные автономные системы c искусственным интеллектом: как избежать превосходстваLAWS with AI: How to aBANdon the SuperiorityСамойловскаяН. А.SamoylovskayaN. A.

Наталья Александровна Самойловская, председатель молодежного отделения

Ленинский проспект 32А, 119991, Москва

ResearcherID: C-6267-2015

Natalya A. Samoylovskaya, Chair, Russian Student/Young Pugwash Group

Moscow, 32A Leninskiy Prospect, 119991

ResearcherID: C-6267-2015

natalya.samoylovskaya@gmail.comРоссийского Пагуошского комитета при Президиуме РАНРоссияRussian Pugwash Committee under the Presidium of the Russian Academy of SciencesRussian Federation202015032021114137146Copyright © Самойловская Н.А., 20212021Самойловская Н.А.Samoylovskaya N.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/320

Учитывая относительную новизну вопросов военного применения искусственного интеллекта (ИИ), автор изучает его влияние на международные отношения, опираясь на последние доклады международных исследовательских центров, организаций и национальные стратегии и программы. Автор в данной статье рассматривает политические последствия военного применения ИИ, национальные и международные подходы к смягчению его вызовов. Уделяя большое внимание политике двух технологических лидеров в этой области, автор приходит к выводу, что сбалансированная политика США определит, смогут ли Китай и США создать, несмотря на наличие конкуренции, единые правила легализации использования систем ИИ в военной сфере и сформировать единые стандарты, включающие высокий уровень безопасности при использовании этих систем, в том числе в вопросах нераспространения данного вида вооружения. Автор также обращает внимание, что сосредоточенность Европы на конфликте с Россией и ее исключение из среды, создаваемой техническими и этико-правовыми инструментами использования ИИ, усугубит элемент непредсказуемости в двусторонних отношениях. Именно поэтому в интересах Европы привлечь Россию к разработке общей платформы и стандартов для применения ИИ. Разработка и установление единых стандартов безопасности поможет избежать проблем с искаженным восприятием применения ИИ и привнесет элемент предсказуемости в международные отношения.

Taking the relative novelty of issues relating to the military use of AI and its influence on international relations into account, the author of this paper relies on the latest reports of international research centres, organizations and national programs on the issue. The paper considers the political consequences of the military use of AI, as well as the national and international approaches to mitigate its challenges. With great attention to the AI policies of two technological leaders in the field, the author concludes that a balanced U.S. policy will determine whether China and the United States will be able to create, despite the presence of competition, common rules for legalizing the use of AI systems in the military sphere and form common standards that include a high level of security in the use of these systems, including the proliferation of such weapons. The author points out that Europe’s concentration on the conflict with Russia and its exclusion from the environment created by the technical and ethical legal tools for using AI will increase unpredictability in relations. This is why it is in Europe’s interests to involve Russia in the development of a common platform and standards for AI. The development and establishment of common safety standards will help avoid problems with perception and introduce an element of predictability in international relations.

ИИсмертоносные автономные системыответственностьСШАКитайЕСРоссияAILAWSresponsibilityU.S.ChinaEURussiaReferencesBoulanin, Vincent, ed. the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk. EuroAtlantic Perspectives. Vol. I. SIPRI, May 2019. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/sipri1905-aistrategic-stability-nuclear-risk.pdf.Boulanin, Vincent, ed. the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk. EuroAtlantic Perspectives. Vol. I. SIPRI, May 2019. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2019-05/sipri1905-aistrategic-stability-nuclear-risk.pdf.Boulanin, Vincent, Netta Goussac, Laura Bruun, and Luke Richards. Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence: Can the European Union Lead the Way in Developing Best Practice? SIPRI, November 2020. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/sipri_report_responsible_artificial_intelligence_research_and_innovation_for_international_peace_and_security_2011.pdf.Boulanin, Vincent, Netta Goussac, Laura Bruun, and Luke Richards. Responsible Military Use of Artificial Intelligence: Can the European Union Lead the Way in Developing Best Practice? SIPRI, November 2020. https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-11/sipri_report_responsible_artificial_intelligence_research_and_innovation_for_international_peace_and_security_2011.pdf.Brown, Michael, Eric Chewning, and Pavneet Singh. Preparing the United States for the Superpower Marathon with China. The Brookings Report, April 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/FP_20200427_superpower_marathon_brown_chewning_singh.pdf.Brown, Michael, Eric Chewning, and Pavneet Singh. Preparing the United States for the Superpower Marathon with China. The Brookings Report, April 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/FP_20200427_superpower_marathon_brown_chewning_singh.pdf.Dynkin, Alexander and Vladimir Baranovsky, eds. Russia and the World: 2024. Economy and Foreign Policy. Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 2019. https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0563-5.Dynkin, Alexander and Vladimir Baranovsky, eds. Russia and the World: 2024. Economy and Foreign Policy. Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO), 2019. https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0563-5.Horowitz, Michael C., Paul Scharre, and Alexander Velez-Green. A Stable Nuclear Future? The Impact of Autonomous Systems and Artificial Intelligence. Conference Paper, December 2019. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1912/1912.05291.pdf.Horowitz, Michael C., Paul Scharre, and Alexander Velez-Green. A Stable Nuclear Future? The Impact of Autonomous Systems and Artificial Intelligence. Conference Paper, December 2019. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1912/1912.05291.pdf.Payne, Kenneth. “Artificial Intelligence: a Revolution in Strategic Affairs?” Survival 60, no. 5 (September 3, 2018): 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2018.1518374.Payne, Kenneth. “Artificial Intelligence: a Revolution in Strategic Affairs?” Survival 60, no. 5 (September 3, 2018): 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2018.1518374.Pinker, Steven. The Better Angels of Our Nature. Penguin Books Ltd., 2012.Pinker, Steven. The Better Angels of Our Nature. Penguin Books Ltd., 2012.Saalman, Lora, ed. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk. East Asian Perspectives. Vol. II. SIPRI, October 2019. https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/the_impact_of_artificial_intelligence_on_strategic_stability_and_nuclear_risk_volume_ii.pdfSaalman, Lora, ed. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk. East Asian Perspectives. Vol. II. SIPRI, October 2019. https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/the_impact_of_artificial_intelligence_on_strategic_stability_and_nuclear_risk_volume_ii.pdf“The Digital Great Game.” Strategic Comments 26, no. 7 (August 8, 2020): iv–vi. https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2020.1846453.“The Digital Great Game.” Strategic Comments 26, no. 7 (August 8, 2020): iv–vi. https://doi.org/10.1080/13567888.2020.1846453.Topychkanov, Petr, ed. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk. South Asian Perspectives. Vol. III. SIPRI, April 2020. https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/impact_of_ai_on_strategic_stability_and_nuclear_risk_vol_iii_topychkanov_1.pdf.Topychkanov, Petr, ed. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk. South Asian Perspectives. Vol. III. SIPRI, April 2020. https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/impact_of_ai_on_strategic_stability_and_nuclear_risk_vol_iii_topychkanov_1.pdf.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.