imiМеждународная аналитикаJournal of International Analytics2587-84762541-9633MGIMO University10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-1-66-82imi-414Research ArticleИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИRESEARCH ARTICLESРегиональное измерение сотрудничества стран БРИКСRegional Dimensions of BRICS CooperationЛагутинаМ. Л.LagutinaM. L.

Мария Львовна Лагутина, д.пол.н., профессор кафедры мировой политики факультета международных отношений

191060, город Санкт-Петербург, ул. Смольного, 1/3, подъезд № 8

Maria L. Lagutina, Dr. in Political Science, Professor of World Politics Department, School of International Relations

191060, St Petersburg, Smolny st., 1/3, entrance 8

manipol@mail.ruСанкт-Петербургский государственный университетРоссияSt. Petersburg State UniversityRussian Federation2022280320221316682Copyright © Лагутина М.Л., 20222022Лагутина М.Л.Lagutina M.L.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/414

БРИКС с момента своего создания рассматривался как один из перспективных элементов системы глобального управления. Однако в последнее время возникла необходимость адаптации этого формата к новым вызовам мировой системы не только на глобальном, но и на региональном уровне. Инициированные БРИКС региональные аутрич-практики и глобальный формат «БРИКС+» нацелены на расширение партнерских связей, так называемого «круга друзей» БРИКС как внутри субрегионов стран БРИКС, так и за их пределами. Партнерами выступают национальные государства и региональные объединения. Оба формата ориентированы на реформирование мировой финансово-экономической системы и формирование полицентричного мирового порядка, основанного на принципах плюрализма и разнообразия, предполагающего привлечение к системе глобального управления не только развитых, но и развивающихся стран «глобального Юга». Цель настоящей статьи – рассмотреть различные теоретические подходы к исследованию БРИКС с позиций теорий «нового» и «сравнительного» регионализма и оценить перспективы регионального взаимодействия стран БРИКС на уровне субрегиональных, межрегиональных и трансрегиональных связей.

Since the beginning, BRICS has been viewed as an element of global governance system. Recently, however, it became necessary to adapt the BRICS format to the new challenges of the world system, not only at the global, but also at the regional levels, as a result of which not only global cooperation mechanisms, but also regional ones, were involved in the activities of the BRICS. BRICS-initiated regional outreach practices and “BRICS+” format are aimed at expanding partnerships, the socalled “circle of friends” of the BRICS, both within the BRICS subregions and beyond. These partners include as national states, as regional organizations. Both formats are focused on reforming the global fi nancial and economic system and the formation of a polycentric world order based on the principles of pluralism and diversity, involving not only developed but also developing countries of the “Global South” in the global governance system. The purpose of this article is to consider various approaches to the study of the BRICS from the standpoint of the theories of “new” and “comparative” regionalism and to assess the prospects for regional interaction of the BRICS countries at the level of subregional, interregional and transregional ties.

БРИКС«БРИКС+»«аутрич»регионализминтеррегионализмтрансрегионализмглобальное управлениерегиональное управлениеBRICS“BRICS+”“outreach”regionalisminterregionalismtrensregionalismglobal governanceregional governanceИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ и Немецкого научно-исследовательского сообщества в рамках научного проекта № 21-514-12001 «Теория мировых учреждений: динамика их внутренней среды, внешнего окружения и организационной роли в мировой политике».The research was carried out with the fi nancial support of the RFBR and the German Research Community within the framework of the scientifi c project No. 21-514-1201 “Theory of world institutions: dynamics of their internal environment, external environment and organizational role in world politics”.ReferencesАвдокушин, Е.Ф., Жариков, М.В. Страны БРИКС в современной мировой экономике. – М.: МАГИСТР ИНФРА-М, 2013. – 479 c.Avdokushin, Evgeny and Mikhail Zharikov. Strany BRIKS v sovremennoj mirovoj ekonomike. Moscow: MAGISTR INFRA-M, 2013 [In Russian].Кадышев Л.Ю., Косолапов Н.А., Куприков П.С., Макушкин А.Г., Окунева Л.С., Орлов А.А., Тимофеев И.Н., Щетинин А.В. БРИК как новая форма многосторонней дипломатии // Международная жизнь. – 2010. – № 1. – C. 45–63. https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/172Kadyshev, L.Yu., N.A. Kosolapov, P.S. Kuprikov, A.G. Makushkin, L.S. Okuneva, A.A. Orlov, I.N. Timofeev, and A.V.Shchetinin. “BRIC as a new form of multilateral diplomacy.” The International Aff airs, no.1 (2010): 45–63 [In Russian].Воскресенский, А.Д. Концепции регионализации, региональных подсистем, региональных комплексов и региональных трансформаций в современных международных отношениях // Сравнительная политика. – 2012. – Том 3. – № 2(8). – С. 30–58. https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2012-3-2(8)-30-58.Voskressenski, Alexei. “Concepts of regionalization, regional subsystems, regional complexes and regional transformations in contemporary international relations.” Comparative Politics Russia 3, no. 2(8) (2012): 30–58 [In Russian].Колдунова, Е.В. Роль стран БРИКС в глобальном управлении // Сравнительная политика. – 2014. – Том 5. – № 1(14). – С. 60–64. https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2014-5-1(14)-60-64.Koldunova, Ekaterina. “The role of BRICS in global governance.” Comparative Politics Russia 5, no. 1(14) (2014): 60–64 [In Russian].Кузнецов, Д.А. Сетевая текстура мировой политики: трансрегионализм БРИКС // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. – 2020. – Том 64. – № 11. С. 124–131. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-124-131.Kuznetsov, Denis. “Network Texture of World Politics: Transregionalism of BRICS.” World Economy and International Relations 64, no.11 (2020): 124–131 [In Russian].Кузнецов, Д.А. Феномен трансрегионализма: проблемы терминологии и концептуализации // Сравнительная политика. – 2016. – Том 7. – № 2(23). – C. 14–25. https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2016-7-2(23)-14-25.Kuznetsov, Denis “Transregionalism: Problems of Terminology and Conceptualization.” Comparative Politics Russia 7, no. 2(23) (2016): 14–25 [In Russian].Кхатри, Дж. Повестка дня для БРИКС в эпоху деглобализации // Вестник Московского университета. Глобалистика и геополитика. – 2017. – № 3. – С. 40–47. https://msupress.com/catalogue/magazines/politika/1444/.Khatri, Jagdish. “Agenda for BRICS in the Era of Deglobalization.” Bulletin of Moscow University. Globalistics and geopolitics, no.3 (2017): 40–47 [In Russian].Лагутина, М.Л. Мир регионов в структуре мировой политической системы 21 века. – Санкт-Петербург: Санкт-Петербургский государственный политехнический университет, 2016. – 300 с.Lagutina, Maria. Mir regionov v strukture mirovoj politicheskoj sistemy 21 veka. Saint Petersburg: St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University, 2016 [In Russian].Лебедева, М.М., Кузнецов, Д.А. Трансрегионализм – новый феномен мировой политики // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2019. – № 5. – С. 71-84. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.05.06.Lebedeva, Marina M., and Denis A. Kuznetsov. “Transregional Integration as a New Phenomenon of World Politics: Nature and Prospects.” Polis. Political Studies, no. 5 (2019): 71-84 [In Russian].Михайленко, Е.Б. Альтернативный регионализм БРИКС // Известия Уральского федерального университета. Серия 3: Общественные науки. – 2016. – Том 155. – № 11. – С. 194–206.Mikhaylenko, Ekaterina. “Al’ternativnyj regionalizm BRIKS.” URFU Journal 155, no. 11 (2016): 194–206 [In Russian].Муратшина, К.Г. Формат «БРИКС плюс»: истоки, особенности институционализации, региональная специфика // Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления). – 2019. – Том 11. – № 1. – С. 135–150. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2019-1-135-150.Muratshina, Ksenia. “BRICS Plus” Format: Background, Institutionalisation Trajectories and Regional Specifi c Features.” Ars Administrandi 11, no.1 (2019): 135–150 [In Russian].Чжао, Х., Лесаж, Д. Анализ мотивов и институционализации аутрич-практик группы БРИКС // Вестник международных организаций: образование, наука, новая экономика. – 2020. – Том 15. – № 2. – С. 93–124. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2020-02-05.Zhao, Huanyu, and Dries Lesage. “Explaining BRICS Outreach: Motivations and Institutionalization.” International Organisations Research Journal 15, no.2 (2020): 93–124 [In Russian].Acharya, Amitav. “Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time has Come?” The International Spectator 47, no.1 (2012): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2012.655004.Acharya, Amitav. “Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time has Come?” The International Spectator 47, no.1 (2012): 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2012.655004.Acharya, Amitav. The End of the American World Order. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2014. Fawcett, Louise. “Between West and Non-West: Latin American Contributions to International Thought.” International History Review 34, no. 2 (2012): 679–704. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2012.707980Acharya, Amitav. The End of the American World Order. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press, 2014. Fawcett, Louise. “Between West and Non-West: Latin American Contributions to International Thought.” International History Review 34, no. 2 (2012): 679–704. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2012.707980Fawcett, Louise. History and Concept of Regionalism: A Call for a Post-revisionist Synthesis. Paper for the International Studies Association Conference 2015. New Orleans: ISA, 2015.Fawcett, Louise. History and Concept of Regionalism: A Call for a Post-revisionist Synthesis. Paper for the International Studies Association Conference 2015. New Orleans: ISA, 2015.Hanggi, Heiner, Ralf, Roloff , and Ruland, Jurgen. “Interregionalism: a New Phenomenon in International Relations.” In Heiner Hanggi et al., Interregionalism and International Relations. Oxon: Routledge, 2006.Hanggi, Heiner, Ralf, Roloff , and Ruland, Jurgen. “Interregionalism: a New Phenomenon in International Relations.” In Heiner Hanggi et al., Interregionalism and International Relations. Oxon: Routledge, 2006.Hettne, Bjorn. “Beyond “New Regionalism”. New Political Economy 10, no.4 (2005): 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460500344484.Hettne, Bjorn. “Beyond “New Regionalism”. New Political Economy 10, no.4 (2005): 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563460500344484.Hettne, Bjorn and Andras Inotai. The new regionalism: implications for global development and international security. UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research, 1994.Hettne, Bjorn and Andras Inotai. The new regionalism: implications for global development and international security. UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research, 1994.Hettne, Bjorn, Andras Inotai and Sunkel, Osvaldo. Globalism and the New Regionalism. London: Macmillan, 1999. Lagutina, Maria. “BRICS in a world of regions”, Third World Thematic: A TWQ Journal 4, no.6 (2019): 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2019.1643781.Hettne, Bjorn, Andras Inotai and Sunkel, Osvaldo. Globalism and the New Regionalism. London: Macmillan, 1999. Lagutina, Maria. “BRICS in a world of regions”, Third World Thematic: A TWQ Journal 4, no.6 (2019): 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2019.1643781.Langenhove, Ludwig van. Building Regions: The Regionalization of the World Order. Ashgate Publishing, 2011.Langenhove, Ludwig van. Building Regions: The Regionalization of the World Order. Ashgate Publishing, 2011.Langenhove, Ludwig van and Ana-Cristina Costea. “The EU as a Global Actor and the Emergence of “Third Generation” Regionalism.” UNU-CRIS Occasional Papers, no. 14 (2005).Langenhove, Ludwig van and Ana-Cristina Costea. “The EU as a Global Actor and the Emergence of “Third Generation” Regionalism.” UNU-CRIS Occasional Papers, no. 14 (2005).Meena, Kishnendra. “Regions, Regionalization and BRICS.” Revolutions: Global Trends and Regional Issues 3, no. 1 (2015): 18–42. https://www.brics.unipr.it/wedit/uploads/contenuti/97/01rev3_gt_meena.pdfMeena, Kishnendra. “Regions, Regionalization and BRICS.” Revolutions: Global Trends and Regional Issues 3, no. 1 (2015): 18–42. https://www.brics.unipr.it/wedit/uploads/contenuti/97/01rev3_gt_meena.pdfNaik, Shraddha. “Rising BRICS: a path to Multipolar World Reality?” Comparative politics 9, no. 1 (2018): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2018-00008.Naik, Shraddha. “Rising BRICS: a path to Multipolar World Reality?” Comparative politics 9, no. 1 (2018): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-3279-2018-00008.Schulz, Michael, Söderbaum, Frederik and Öjendal, Joakim Regionalization in a Globalizing World: a Comparative Perspective on Forms, Actors, and Processes. Zed Books Limited, 2001.Schulz, Michael, Söderbaum, Frederik and Öjendal, Joakim Regionalization in a Globalizing World: a Comparative Perspective on Forms, Actors, and Processes. Zed Books Limited, 2001.Söderbaum, Fredrik. Rethinking Regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2016.Söderbaum, Fredrik. Rethinking Regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2016.Sunkel, Osvaldo and Andras Inotai. Globalism and the New Regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.Sunkel, Osvaldo and Andras Inotai. Globalism and the New Regionalism. Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.Telò, Mario. European Union and New Regionalism. Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2013.Telò, Mario. European Union and New Regionalism. Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2013.Telò, Mario. Regionalism in Hard Times. Competitive and Post-Liberal Trends in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. London, New York: Routledge, 2017.Telò, Mario. Regionalism in Hard Times. Competitive and Post-Liberal Trends in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. London, New York: Routledge, 2017.Voskressenski, Alexei “Transregionalism and Regionalism: What Kind of a Balance Do We Need, and Its Consequences for Practical Policies”. In The Regional World Order. Transregionalism, regional Integration, and Regional Projects across Europe and Asia, edited by Alexei D. Voskressenski et all, 3–21. Langham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefi eld/Lexington Books, 2019.Voskressenski, Alexei “Transregionalism and Regionalism: What Kind of a Balance Do We Need, and Its Consequences for Practical Policies”. In The Regional World Order. Transregionalism, regional Integration, and Regional Projects across Europe and Asia, edited by Alexei D. Voskressenski et all, 3–21. Langham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman & Littlefi eld/Lexington Books, 2019.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.