imiМеждународная аналитикаJournal of International Analytics2587-84762541-9633MGIMO University10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-1-83-93imi-415Research ArticleИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИRESEARCH ARTICLESКонференция государств-участников Конвенции ООН против коррупции: возможности международного сотрудничества и результаты деятельностиConference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption: Opportunities for International Cooperation and Results of ActivitiesКовтунЕ. А.KovtunE. A.

Екатерина Андреевна Ковтун, преподаватель кафедры социологии

190013, город Санкт-Петербург, Московский проспект, д. 26

Ekaterina A. Kovtun, Lecturer at the Department of Sociology

190013, St Petersburg, Moskovsky prospect, 26

ekaterin.kovtun@yandex.ruСанкт-Петербургский государственный технологический институт (технический университет)РоссияSaint-Petersburg State Institute of TechnologyRussian Federation2022280320221318393Copyright © Ковтун Е.А., 20222022Ковтун Е.А.Kovtun E.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/415

Международное сотрудничество в рамках Конференции государств-участников Конвенции ООН против коррупции, с одной стороны, продолжает традиции международных межправительственных организаций, а с другой – представляет собой новый формат взаимодействия государств в сфере антикоррупционной деятельности, обладающий отличительными характеристиками. Роль Конференции в международном сотрудничестве по вопросам предупреждения и противодействия коррупции является уникальной ввиду количества участников и направлений деятельности. Целью данной статьи является анализ особенностей функционирования данной Конференции и результатов ее деятельности с 2006 г. На основе анализа документов и научных публикаций автор приходит к выводу о том, что, несмотря на значимость Конференции как площадки для многостороннего диалога, достичь значительного прогресса в отношении заявленных направлений деятельности государствам-участникам Конвенции ООН против коррупции не удалось. Автором выделены основные трудности, с которыми они сталкиваются при реализации антикоррупционных мер, основанных на нормах международного права.

The format of international cooperation of the Conference of the Countries Participating in the UN Convention against Corruption, on the one hand, continues the traditions of international intergovernmental organizations, and on the other hand, represents a new format of interaction between states in the fi eld of anti-corruption activities, which has distinctive features. The Conference has a pivotal role in international cooperation on the prevention and combating of corruption due to the wide area of activities and the number of participants. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the features of the functioning of the Conference of the Countries Participating in the UN Convention against Corruption and the results of its activities since 2006. Using the analysis of documents and scientifi c publications, the author concludes that despite the importance of the Conference as a platform for multilateral dialogue, the countries participating in the United Nations Convention against Corruption failed to achieve signifi cant progress in the declared areas of activity. The author highlights the main diffi culties faced by states in implementing anti-corruption measures based on the norms of international law.

Конвенция ООН против коррупциимеждународное сотрудничествопротиводействие коррупцииUnited Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC)international cooperationanti-corruption policyИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ и Немецкого научно-исследовательского сообщества научный проект № 21-514-12001.The reported study was funded by RFBR and DFG, project number 21-514-12001.ReferencesГравина, А.А. Транснациональная коррупция как состав международного преступления // Журнал российского права. – 2015. – № 12 (228). – С. 87–100. https://doi.org/10.12737/16640.Gravina, Alla. “Transnational Corruption as a Type of International Corpus Delicti.” Journal of Russian Law 3, no 12 (December 14, 2015): 87–100.Кабанов, П.А. Антикоррупционное информирование как форма антикоррупционного просвещения: понятие и содержание // Мониторинг правоприменения. – 2015. – №2 (15). – С. 40–46.Kabanov, Pavel. “Anti-Corruption Informing as a Form of Anti-Corruption Awareness Raising: Notion and Contents.” Monitoring of Law Enforcement , no. 2 (2015): 40–46 [In Russian].Майборода, Э.Т. Наднациональные юрисдикции противодействия коррупции // Теоретическая и прикладная юриспруденция. 2019. – № 2. – С. 64–68.Mayboroda, Elvira. “International Jurisdiction on Fighting Against Corruption.” Theoretical and Applied Law, no. 2 (2019): 64–68 [In Russian].Меньшенина, Н.Н. Международное право : [учеб. пособие] / Н. Н. Меньшенина ; М-во образования и науки Рос. Федерации, Урал. федер. ун-т. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2016. – 100 c.Menshenina, Natalia. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University Publishing House, 2016 [In Russian].Охотский, Е.В. Правовые основы и механизмы международного сотрудничества в сфере противодействия коррупции // Российский журнал правовых исследований. – 2017. – Том 4 (2). – C. 125–138. https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS18323Okhotskiy, E V. “Pravovye Osnovy i Mekhanizmy Mezhdunarodnogo Sotrudnichestva v Sfere Protivodeystviya Korruptsii.” Russian Journal of Legal Studies 4, no. 2 (June 15, 2017): 125–138.Охотский Е.В. Участие России в международном антикоррупционном сотрудничестве // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. – 2019. – №1. – С.211–228.Okhotsky, Evgeny. “Russia’s Participation in International Anti-Corruption Cooperation.” Public Administration Issues, no. 1 (2019): 211–228 [In Russian].Стукал, Д.К. Многоликая коррупция и ее измерение в исследованиях международных организаций. // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. – 2012. – № 3. – С. 83-90. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2012-3-83-90Stukal, Denis. “Multifaced Corruption and its Measurement in International Organizations Studies.” World Economy and International Relations, no. 3 (2012): 83–90 [In Russian].Цирин, А.М., Севальнев, В.В., Черепанова, Е.В., Матулис, С.Н., Матвеев, В.В. Право против коррупции: миссия и новые тренды // Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. – 2019. – № 3. – С. 124–139.Tsirin, A.M., V.V. Sevalnev, E.V. Cherepanova, S.N. Matulis, and V.V. Matveev. “Law Against Corruption: Mission and New Trends.” Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, no. 3 (2019): 124–139 [In Russian].Charron, Nicholas. “Do Corruption Measures Have a Perception Problem? Assessing the relationship bet ween experiences and perceptions of corruption among citizens and experts.” European Political Science Review 8, no. 1 (2016): 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000447Charron, Nicholas. “Do Corruption Measures Have a Perception Problem? Assessing the relationship bet ween experiences and perceptions of corruption among citizens and experts.” European Political Science Review 8, no. 1 (2016): 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000447Clammer, John. “Corruption, Development, Chaos and Social Disorganisation: Sociological refl ections on corruption and its social basis.” In Corruption: Expanding the focus Australia, edited by Manuhuia Barcham, Hindess Barry, and Larmout Peter, 113–132. Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia, 2012.Clammer, John. “Corruption, Development, Chaos and Social Disorganisation: Sociological refl ections on corruption and its social basis.” In Corruption: Expanding the focus Australia, edited by Manuhuia Barcham, Hindess Barry, and Larmout Peter, 113–132. Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia, 2012.Donchev, Dilyan, and Gergely Ujhelyi. “Do Corruption Indices Measure Corruption.” University of Houston, https://uh.edu/~gujhelyi/corrmeasures.pdf.Donchev, Dilyan, and Gergely Ujhelyi. “Do Corruption Indices Measure Corruption.” University of Houston, https://uh.edu/~gujhelyi/corrmeasures.pdf.Ghatak, A., and S. Iyengar. “Corruption Breeds Corruption.” Studies in Microeconomics 2, no. 1 (March 2014): 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321022214522730Ghatak, A., and S. Iyengar. “Corruption Breeds Corruption.” Studies in Microeconomics 2, no. 1 (March 2014): 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321022214522730Graycar, Adam. “Corruption.” In International Crime and Justice, edited by Mangai Natarajan, 215–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Graycar, Adam. “Corruption.” In International Crime and Justice, edited by Mangai Natarajan, 215–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Alexander Hamilton, and Craig Hammer. “Can We Measure the Power of the Grabbing Hand? A Comparative Analysis of Diff erent Indicators of Corruption.” Policy Research Working Papers, no. 8299 (January 2018).Alexander Hamilton, and Craig Hammer. “Can We Measure the Power of the Grabbing Hand? A Comparative Analysis of Diff erent Indicators of Corruption.” Policy Research Working Papers, no. 8299 (January 2018).Augusto Lopez-Claros, Arthur Dahl, and Maja Groff . “Corruption as a Destroyer of Prosperity and the Need for International Enforcement.” In Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21st Century, 401–403. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Augusto Lopez-Claros, Arthur Dahl, and Maja Groff . “Corruption as a Destroyer of Prosperity and the Need for International Enforcement.” In Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21st Century, 401–403. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Moiseienko, Anton. “Due Process.” In Corruption and Targeted Sanctions, 212–42. Brill Nijhoff , 2018. Olken, Benjamin. “Corruption Perceptions vs. Corruption Reality.” Journal of Public Economics, no. 93 (March 2009): 950–964.Moiseienko, Anton. “Due Process.” In Corruption and Targeted Sanctions, 212–42. Brill Nijhoff , 2018. Olken, Benjamin. “Corruption Perceptions vs. Corruption Reality.” Journal of Public Economics, no. 93 (March 2009): 950–964.Park Heungsik, and Lee Jimoon. “The infl uence of media, positive perception, and identifi cation on survey-based measures of corruption.” Business Ethics: A European Review, no. 26 (January 2017): 312–320.Park Heungsik, and Lee Jimoon. “The infl uence of media, positive perception, and identifi cation on survey-based measures of corruption.” Business Ethics: A European Review, no. 26 (January 2017): 312–320.Rose, Cecily. “The Limitations of the United Nations Convention against Corruption.” In International Anti- Corruption Norms, 97–132. Oxford University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737216.003.0004.Rose, Cecily. “The Limitations of the United Nations Convention against Corruption.” In International Anti- Corruption Norms, 97–132. Oxford University Press, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198737216.003.0004.Shulman, Sarah. “The Criminalization of Bribery: Can the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act be Applicable to the Anti-Bribery Provisions of The United Nations Convention Against Corruption?” American University International Law Review 29, no. 3 (2014): 717–753.Shulman, Sarah. “The Criminalization of Bribery: Can the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act be Applicable to the Anti-Bribery Provisions of The United Nations Convention Against Corruption?” American University International Law Review 29, no. 3 (2014): 717–753.Jan Wouters, Cedric Ryngaert, and Ann Sofi e Cloots. “The Fight Against Corruption in International Law.” Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper no. 94 (July 2012).Jan Wouters, Cedric Ryngaert, and Ann Sofi e Cloots. “The Fight Against Corruption in International Law.” Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper no. 94 (July 2012).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.