imiМеждународная аналитикаJournal of International Analytics2587-84762541-9633MGIMO University10.46272/2587-8476-2024-15-2-74-91imi-553Research ArticleИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИRESEARCH ARTICLESКитайская школа международных отношений – успех исследовательской программыThe Chinese School of IR – Success of the Research ProgramКозинецА. И.KozinetsA. I.

Андрей Игоревич Козинец, к.полит.н., доцент кафедры международных отношений

690922, Владивосток, о. Русский, п. Аякс, д. 10.

Andrei I. Kozinets, PhD in Political Science, Associate Professor, Department of International Studies

10, Ayaks settlement, Russky Island, Vladivostok, 690922

Дальневосточный федеральный университетРоссияFar Eastern Federal UniversityRussian Federation2024200920241527491Copyright © Козинец А.И., 20242024Козинец А.И.Kozinets A.I.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/553

Современная социальная организация академической науки в Китае позволила сформировать особые условия для развития теоретического знания в стране. Важной составляющей успешного развития китайских теорий международных отношений по-прежнему остается классическая китайская философия, а также богатый исторический опыт межгосударственных связей в Восточной Азии. При этом вопросы развития теории занимают центральное место в научном сообществе КНР на протяжении многих лет, так же как и система мотивации исследовательских кадров и методологическая подготовка исследователей. В статье рассматриваются основные этапы развития китайской школы как незападного подхода в теории международных отношений с особым вниманием к институциональным аспектам с точки зрения социологии науки.

 

The current social organisation of academic science in China has created special conditions for the development of theoretical knowledge in the country. Classical Chinese philosophy, as well as the rich historical experience of interstate relations in East Asia, remains an important component of the successful development of Chinese theories of international relations. At the same time, issues of theory development have for many years occupied a central place in the scientific community of the People’s Republic of China, as has the system of motivation of research personnel and methodological training of researchers. The article examines the main stages in the development of the Chinese school as a non-Western approach to the theory of international relations, playing particular attention to institutional aspects from the perspective of the sociology of science.

 

незападные теории международных отношенийкитайская школакитайские подходы в теории международных отношенийтеория международных отношений в Китаенациональные школы в теории международных отношенийnon-western IR theoryChinese IR schoolChinese approaches in IRIR theory in Chinanational schools in IR theoryReferencesАлексеева, Т.А. Теория международных отношений как политическая философия и наука. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2019. 608 с.Alekseeva, Tatiana A. Theory of International Relations as a Political Philosophy and Science. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2019 [In Russian].Бузан, Б. «Наука о международных отношениях – удел избранного круга государств...» // Международные процессы. 2012. № 3–4. С. 73–82.Buzan, Barry. “The Science of International Relations is the Domain of a Select Circle of States...” International Trends, no. 3–4 (2012): 73–82 [In Russian].Виноградов, А В., Салицкий А.И. Можно ли говорить о формировании в Китае нового общественного строя? // Вестник Российской академии наук. 2019. № 2. С. 172–178.Vinogradov, Andrei V., Salickij, Alexander I. “Is it Possible to Talk about the Formation of a New Social Order in China?” Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, no. 2 (2019): 172–178 [In Russian].Грачиков, Е.Н. Китайская теория международных отношений // Международные процессы. 2016. № 3. С. 68–80.Grachikov, Evgeniy N. “Chinese International Relations Theory.” International Trends, no. 3 (2016): 68–80 [In Russian].Грачиков, Е.Н. Китайская школа международных отношений: на пути к большим теориям. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2021. 304 с.Grachikov, Evgeniy N. The Chinese School of International Relations: on the Way to Big Theories. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2021 [In Russian].Кривохиж, С.В., Соболева, Е.Д. Древность на службе современности: теория морального реализма Янь Сюэтуна и будущее мирового порядка // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2017. № 11. С. 76–84. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-11-76-84.Krivokhizh, Svetlana V., Soboleva, Elena D. “The Past Serving the Present: Yan Xuetong’s Theory of Moral Realism and the Future of the Global Order.” World Economy and International Relations, no. 11 (2017): 76–84 [In Russian].Лакатос, И. Избранные произведения по философии и методологии науки. М.: Академический Проект, 2008. 475 с.Lakatos, Imre. Selected Works on Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Moscow: Academic Project, 2008 [In Russian].Пятачкова, А.С. Китайская школа международных отношений в исследованиях российских ученых // Российское китаеведение. 2023. № 3. С. 53–68. https://doi.org/10.48647/ICCA.2023.73.80.004.Piatachkova, Anastasiia S. “The Chinese School of International Relations in Russian Scholarship.” Russian Sinology, no 3 (2023): 53–68 [In Russian].Соколов, М.М., Титаев, К.Д. Провинциальная и туземная наука // Антропологический форум. 2013. № 19. С. 239–275.Sokolov, Mikhail M., Titaev, Kirill D. “Provincial and Native Science.” Forum for Anthropology and Culture, no. 19 (2013): 239– 275 [In Russian].Фуко, М. Археология знания. СПб.: Гуманитарная академия, 2012. 416 с.Foucault, Michelle. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Saint-Petersburg.: Gumanitarnaya akademiya, 2012 [In Russian].Фуко, М. Нужно защищать общество: Курс лекций, прочитанных в Колледж де Франс в 1975–1976 учебном году. Спб.: Наука, 2005. 312 c.Foucault, Michelle. We need to Protect Society: A Course of Lectures Delivered at the College de France in the 1975–1976 Academic Year. Saint-Petersburg: Nauka, 2005 [In Russian].Цыганков, А.П. Российская теория международных отношений: какой ей быть? // Сравнительная политика. 2014. № 2. С. 65–83.Tsygankov, Andrei P. “Russia International Relations Theory: What Should it be Like?” Comparative politics, no. 2 (2014): 65–83.Babones, Salvatore. American Tianxia: Chinese Money, American Power, and the End of History. Bristol: Policy Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t88xx8.Babones, Salvatore. American Tianxia: Chinese Money, American Power, and the End of History. Bristol: Policy Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t88xx8.Bajpai, Kanti. “Obstacles to Good Work in Indian International Relations.” International Studies, no. 1–2 (2009): 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600208.Bajpai, Kanti. “Obstacles to Good Work in Indian International Relations.” International Studies, no. 1–2 (2009): 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600208.Buzan, Barry, “China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible?”, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3, no. 1 (2010): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop014Buzan, Barry, “China in International Society: Is ‘Peaceful Rise’ Possible?”, The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3, no. 1 (2010): 5–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop014Deng, Yong. “The Chinese Conception of National Interests in International Relations.” The China Quarterly 154 (1998): 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000002058.Deng, Yong. “The Chinese Conception of National Interests in International Relations.” The China Quarterly 154 (1998): 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000002058.Khong, Yuen F. “The American Tributary System.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 6, no. 1 (2013): 1–47.Khong, Yuen F. “The American Tributary System.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 6, no. 1 (2013): 1–47.Kristensen, Peter M., Nielsen, Ras T. “Constructing a Chinese International Relations Theory: A Sociological Approach to Intellectual Innovation.” International Political Sociology 7, no. 1 (2013): 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12007.Kristensen, Peter M., Nielsen, Ras T. “Constructing a Chinese International Relations Theory: A Sociological Approach to Intellectual Innovation.” International Political Sociology 7, no. 1 (2013): 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12007.Li, Bin. “Insights into the Mozi and their implications for the Study of Contemporary International Relations”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 3 (2009): 421–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop005.Li, Bin. “Insights into the Mozi and their implications for the Study of Contemporary International Relations”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 3 (2009): 421–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pop005.Luo, Zhitian. “From ‘Tianxia’ (all under Heaven) to the World’: Changes in Late Qing Intellectuals’ Conceptions of Human Society.” Social Sciences in China 29, no. 2 (2008): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529200802091276.Luo, Zhitian. “From ‘Tianxia’ (all under Heaven) to the World’: Changes in Late Qing Intellectuals’ Conceptions of Human Society.” Social Sciences in China 29, no. 2 (2008): 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529200802091276.Matoo, Amitabh. “The State of International Studies in India.” International Studies, no. 1–2 (2009): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600204.Matoo, Amitabh. “The State of International Studies in India.” International Studies, no. 1–2 (2009): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600204.Shambaugh, David, Wang, Jisi. “Research on International Studies in the People’s Republic of China. Political Science and Politics, no. 4 (1984): 758–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/418762.Shambaugh, David, Wang, Jisi. “Research on International Studies in the People’s Republic of China. Political Science and Politics, no. 4 (1984): 758–764. https://doi.org/10.2307/418762.Tang, Shiping. On Social Evolution: Phenomenon and Paradigm. London: Routledge, 2020.Tang, Shiping. On Social Evolution: Phenomenon and Paradigm. London: Routledge, 2020.Thuy, Do T. “China’s Rise and the ‘Chinese Dream’ in International Relations Theory.” Global Change, Peace & Security 27, no. 1 (2015): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2015.995612.Thuy, Do T. “China’s Rise and the ‘Chinese Dream’ in International Relations Theory.” Global Change, Peace & Security 27, no. 1 (2015): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2015.995612.Qin, Yaqing. “A Relational Theory of World Politics”. International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv031.Qin, Yaqing. “A Relational Theory of World Politics”. International Studies Review 18, no. 1 (2016): 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv031.Qin, Yaqing. “International Society as a Process: Institutions, Identities, and China’s Peaceful Rise”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3, no. 2 (2010):129–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq007.Qin, Yaqing. “International Society as a Process: Institutions, Identities, and China’s Peaceful Rise”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3, no. 2 (2010):129–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq007.Qin, Yaqing. “Why There is no Chinese International Relations Theory?” International Relations of the Asia Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 313–340.Qin, Yaqing. “Why There is no Chinese International Relations Theory?” International Relations of the Asia Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 313–340.Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, 2010.Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, 2010.Wang, Jisi. “China’s Search for a Grand Strategy: A Rising Great Power Finds Its Way.” Foreign Affairs 90, no. 2 (2011): 68–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25800458.Wang, Jisi. “China’s Search for a Grand Strategy: A Rising Great Power Finds Its Way.” ForeignWang, Jiangli, Buzan, Barry. “The English and Chinese Schools of International Relations: Comparisons and Lessons.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no. 1 (2014): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pot017.Affairs 90, no. 2 (2011): 68–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25800458.Whitley, Richard. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Wang, Jiangli, Buzan, Barry. “The English and Chinese Schools of International Relations: Comparisons and Lessons.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 7, no. 1 (2014): 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pot017.Wang, Yiwei. “China: Between Copying and Constructing.” In International Relations Scholarship around the World, edited by Arlene B. Tickner, Ole Wæver, 103–119. London: Routledge, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885451.Whitley, Richard. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Yan, Fengqiao. “The Academic Profession in China in the Context of Social Transition: An Institutional Perspective.” European Review 18, no. S1 (2010): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798709990342.Wang, Yiwei. “China: Between Copying and Constructing.” In International Relations Scholarship around the World, edited by Arlene B. Tickner, Ole Wæver, 103–119. London: Routledge, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885451.Yan, Xuetong. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32bbm1.Yan, Fengqiao. “The Academic Profession in China in the Context of Social Transition: An Institutional Perspective.” European Review 18, no. S1 (2010): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798709990342.Yan, Xuetong. “Political Leadership and Power Redistribution”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9, no. 1 (2016): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow002.Yan, Xuetong. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt32bbm1.Yan, Xuetong. “Xun Zi’s Thoughts on International Politics and their Implications”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 1 (2008): 135–165.Yan, Xuetong. “Political Leadership and Power Redistribution”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 9, no. 1 (2016): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pow002.Zhao, Keijin. “China’s Rise and Its Discursive Power Strategy.” Chinese Political Science Review, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0027-x.Yan, Xuetong. “Xun Zi’s Thoughts on International Politics and their Implications”. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2, no. 1 (2008): 135–165.Zhao, Tingyang. “Political World Philosophy in Terms of All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia).” Diogenes 56, no 1 (2009): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192109102149.Zhao, Keijin. “China’s Rise and Its Discursive Power Strategy.” Chinese Political Science Review, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-016-0027-x.Zhao, Tingyang. Redefining a Philosophy for World Governance. Palgrave Pivot Singapore, 2019.Zhao, Tingyang. “Political World Philosophy in Terms of All-under-Heaven (Tian-Xia).” Diogenes 56, no 1 (2009): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192109102149.Zhao, Tingyang. “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’ (Tian-xia).” Social Identities 12, no. 1 (2006): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630600555559.Zhao, Tingyang. Redefining a Philosophy for World Governance. Palgrave Pivot Singapore, 2019.Zhang, Yongjin “International Relations Theory in China Today: The State of the Field.” The China Journal 47, no. 1 (2002): 101–108.Zhao, Tingyang. “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under-Heaven’ (Tian-xia).” Social Identities 12, no. 1 (2006): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630600555559.Zhang, Yongjin. “The ‘English School’ in China: A Travelogue of Ideas and Their Diffusion.” European Journal of International Relations 9, no. 1 (2003): 87–114.Zhang, Yongjin “International Relations Theory in China Today: The State of the Field.” The China Journal 47, no. 1 (2002): 101–108.Zhang, Yongjin, Chang, Teng-Chi, eds. Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing Debates and Sociological Realities. London: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692432.Zhang, Yongjin. “The ‘English School’ in China: A Travelogue of Ideas and Their Diffusion.” European Journal of International Relations 9, no. 1 (2003): 87–114.胡守钧: “社会共生论”, 复旦大学出版社, 2006. Hu, Shoujun. A Theory of Social Symbiosis. Fudan University Publishing House, 2006 [In Chinese].Zhang, Yongjin, Chang, Teng-Chi, eds. Constructing a Chinese School of International Relations: Ongoing Debates and Sociological Realities. London: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692432.简军波: “从“民族国家体系”到“天下体系”:可能的国际秩序?” «国际关系研究», 2015年 第一期, 第 37-40页.胡守钧: “社会共生论”, 复旦大学出版社, 2006. Hu, Shoujun. A Theory of Social Symbiosis. Fudan University Publishing House, 2006 [In Chinese].Jian, Junbo. “From ‘Nation-State System’ to ‘World System’: Possible International Order?” International Relations Research, no. 1. (2015): 37–40 [In Chinese].简军波: “从“民族国家体系”到“天下体系”:可能的国际秩序?” «国际关系研究», 2015年 第一期, 第 37-40页.任剑涛: “当代中国的国际理念:融入“世界”,抑或重启“天下”?” «山西师大学报(社会科学版)», 2020年 第五期, 第1-15页.Jian, Junbo. “From ‘Nation-State System’ to ‘World System’: Possible International Order?” International Relations Research, no. 1. (2015): 37–40 [In Chinese].Ren, Jiantao. “The International Concept of Contemporary China: To Integrate into the World or to Restart the ‘World’?” Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Social Science Edition), no. 5 (2020): 1–15 [In Chinese].任剑涛: “当代中国的国际理念:融入“世界”,抑或重启“天下”?” «山西师大学报(社会科学版)», 2020年 第五期, 第1-15页.任晓: “从世界政府到“共生和平”” «国际观察»,2019年 第一期, 第36-50页Ren, Jiantao. “The International Concept of Contemporary China: To Integrate into the World or to Restart the ‘World’?” Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Social Science Edition), no. 5 (2020): 1–15 [In Chinese].Ren, Xiao. “From World Government to Symbiotic Peace” International Review, no. 1 (2019): 36–50 [In Chinese].任晓: “从世界政府到“共生和平”” «国际观察»,2019年 第一期, 第36-50页阮建平: “话语权与国际秩序的建构” «现代国际关系» ,2003年 第五期,第31-59页.Ren, Xiao. “From World Government to Symbiotic Peace” International Review, no. 1 (2019): 36–50 [In Chinese].Ruan, Jianping. “Discourse Power and the Construction of International Order.” Modern International Relations, no. 5 (2003): 31–59 [In Chinese].阮建平: “话语权与国际秩序的建构” «现代国际关系» ,2003年 第五期,第31-59页.王逸舟: “当代国际政治析论”, 人民出版社, 1995.Ruan, Jianping. “Discourse Power and the Construction of International Order.” Modern International Relations, no. 5 (2003): 31–59 [In Chinese].Wang, Yizhou. Analysis of Contemporary International Politics. People’s Publishing House, 1995 [In Chinese].王逸舟: “当代国际政治析论”, 人民出版社, 1995.阎学通: “中国国家利益分析”, 天津人民出版社，1996.Wang, Yizhou. Analysis of Contemporary International Politics. People’s Publishing House, 1995 [In Chinese].Yan, Xuetong. Analysis of National Interests of China. Tianjin People’s Publishing House, 1996 [In Chinese].阎学通: “中国国家利益分析”, 天津人民出版社，1996.Yan, Xuetong. Analysis of National Interests of China. Tianjin People’s Publishing House, 1996 [In Chinese].Yan, Xuetong. Analysis of National Interests of China. Tianjin People’s Publishing House, 1996 [In Chinese].

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.