imiМеждународная аналитикаJournal of International Analytics2587-84762541-9633MGIMO University10.46272/2587-8476-2024-15-4-120-136imi-595Research ArticleИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИRESEARCH ARTICLESДипломатическое измерение трансформации правящей элиты и официальной оппозиции Великобритании в 2015–2022 годахDiplomatic Dimension of the transformation of the UK Ruling Elite and the Official Opposition, 2015–2022МалининаА. А.MalininaA. A.

Александра Андреевна Малинина, аспирант департамента международных отношений 

101000, Москва, ул. Мясницкая, 20

Aleksandra A. Malinina, PhD student, School of International Affairs

20, Myasnitskaya street, Moscow, 101000

aamalinina@hse.ruНИУ ВШЭРоссияNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation202415042025154120136Copyright © Малинина А.А., 20252025Малинина А.А.Malinina A.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/595

Статья посвящена трансформации правящей элиты и официальной оппозиции Соединенного Королевства (2015–2022) и ее взаимосвязи с дипломатической практикой Британии. В обозначенный период британская политическая система столкнулась с множеством различных вызовов, включая референдум о членстве страны в ЕС, последовавший сложный переговорный процесс об условиях выхода из интеграционного объединения, различные внутрипартийные расколы по ключевым вопросам британской политической жизни и иные. Все это не только обусловило частичное обновление британской политической элиты, но и определило ее дипломатическую повестку. Помимо этого, в работе проанализировано влияние обозначенных событий на структуру и динамику властных отношений, а также на стратегические приоритеты и идеологические установки как правящей элиты Британии, так и ее оппозиции. В статье рассмотрены изменения таких ключевых характеристик элиты, как половозрастной состав, этническое происхождение, уровень образования политиков, а также дана оценка новым тенденциям в их политических взглядах и поведении. Внимание также уделено последствиям трансформации элиты для британской политической системы и дипломатии.

The article is devoted to the transformation of both the ruling elite and the Official Opposition in the United Kingdom in the period 2015–2022 and its reflection in Britain’s diplomatic practices. During this period, the British political system faced many different challenges, including the referendum on the country’s membership of the EU, the subsequent difficult process of the country‘s withdrawal from the integration association, various internal party splits on key issues of British political life. All these issues not only influenced the formation of the new British political elite, but also shaped its diplomatic agenda. The study of the generation of ideas in the British elite, as well as the study of its composition, makes it possible to determine the value of its influence on foreign policy decisions, as well as the influence of its composition on Britain’s activities in the international arena. It also analyzes the impact of these events on the structure and dynamics of power relations, as well as on the strategic priorities and ideological attitudes of both Britain’s ruling elite and its opposition. The article examines changes in key characteristics of the elite, such as the gender, age, ethnicity and educational attainment of politicians, and assesses new trends in their political views and behaviour. Attention is also given to the implications of elite change for the British political system.

политическая элитадипломатияСоединенное КоролевствоБрекзитоппозицияЕСИндо-Тихоокеанский регионpolitical elitediplomacyUnited KingdomBrexitoppositionEUIndo-PacificReferencesГодованюк, К.А. «Постколониальный момент» во внешнеполитическом дискурсе: казус «Глобальной Британии» // Международная аналитика. 2023. № 2. С. 116–132. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-2-116-132.Godovanyuk, Kira A. “‘Poscolonial Moment’ in Foreign Policy Discourse: the Casus of ‘Global Britain’.” Journal of International Analytics 14, no. 6 (2023): 116–132 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-2-116-132.Корниенко, О.Ю. От ценностей британских элит – к реализации национальных установок в международных отношениях // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 27: Глобалистика и геополитика. 2024. № 1. C. 30–42. https://doi.org/10.56429/2414-4894-2023-43-1-30-42.Kornienko, Ol’ga Yu. “From British Elites Values to Promotion of National Interests in International Relations.” Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 27: Globalistics and Geopolitics, no. 1 (2024): 30–42 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.56429/2414-4894-2023-43-1-30-42.Овчинников, В.В. Сакура и дуб. М.: Издательство АСТ, 2024. Ovchinnikov, Vsevolod V. Sakura and Oak. Moscow: AST Publishing House, 2024 [In Russian].Ovchinnikov, Vsevolod V. Sakura and Oak. Moscow: AST Publishing House, 2024 [In Russian].Сагимбаев, А.В. Подготовка проекта индийской конституции в первой половине 1930-х гг.: столкновение интересов внутри британской политической элиты // История. Общество. Политика. 2021. № 3(19). С. 6–17. https://doi.org/10.15826/usos.2023.13.8.Sagimbayev, Alexey V. “Preparation of the Draft of the Indian Constitution in the First Half of the 1930s: The Clash of Interests Within the British Political Elite.” History. Society. Politics, no. 3 (2021): 6–17 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15826/usos.2023.13.8.Aidt, Toke, Grey, Felix, and Alexandru Savu. “The Meaningful Votes: Voting on Brexit in the British House of Commons.” Public Choice 186, (2021): 587–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00762-9.Aidt, Toke, Grey, Felix, and Alexandru Savu. “The Meaningful Votes: Voting on Brexit in the British House of Commons.” Public Choice 186, (2021): 587–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00762-9.Atkins, Judi. “Rhetoric and Audience Reception: An Analysis of Theresa May’s Vision of Britain and Britishness After Brexit.” Politics 42, no. 2 (2022): 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395721991411.Atkins, Judi. “Rhetoric and Audience Reception: An Analysis of Theresa May’s Vision of Britain and Britishness After Brexit.” Politics 42, no. 2 (2022): 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395721991411.Booth, Oliver. “The Downfall of Boris Johnson: Analysing Patterns of Opinion Among ConservativeBooth, Oliver. “The Downfall of Boris Johnson: Analysing Patterns of Opinion Among ConservativeParliamentarians in the Confidence Motion and Mass Resignations.” Representation 61, no. 1 (2025): 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2024.2365676.Parliamentarians in the Confidence Motion and Mass Resignations.” Representation 61, no. 1 (2025): 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2024.2365676.Booth, Oliver, Butler, Chris, Jeffery, David, and Andrew Roe-Crines. “Selecting Sunak: Conservative MPs’ Nomination Preferences in the (Second) British Conservative Party Leadership Election.” Parliamentary Affairs 77, no. 3 (2024): 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsad010.Booth, Oliver, Butler, Chris, Jeffery, David, and Andrew Roe-Crines. “Selecting Sunak: Conservative MPs’ Nomination Preferences in the (Second) British Conservative Party Leadership Election.” Parliamentary Affairs 77, no. 3 (2024): 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsad010.Brassett, James, and Christopher S Browning. “Lettuce Rejoice in the Downfall of Liz Truss? Humour, Ontological (In)Security and the Politics of Ridicule.“ Alternatives 50, no. 1 (2025): 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754241293619.Brassett, James, and Christopher S Browning. “Lettuce Rejoice in the Downfall of Liz Truss? Humour, Ontological (In)Security and the Politics of Ridicule.“ Alternatives 50, no. 1 (2025): 129–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754241293619.Brusenbauch Meislová, Monica, and Birgit Bujard. “Prime Ministerial Political Leadership and the Domestic Politics of Brexit: Theresa May and Boris Johnson Compared.” British Politics 19, (June 2024): 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-023-00240-3.Brusenbauch Meislová, Monica, and Birgit Bujard. “Prime Ministerial Political Leadership and the Domestic Politics of Brexit: Theresa May and Boris Johnson Compared.” British Politics 19, (June 2024): 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-023-00240-3.Byrne, Chris, Randall, Nick, and Kevin Theakston. “Theresa May’s Disjunctive Premiership: Choice and Constraint in Political Time.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 23, no. 4 (2021): 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211016931.Byrne, Chris, Randall, Nick, and Kevin Theakston. “Theresa May’s Disjunctive Premiership: Choice and Constraint in Political Time.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 23, no. 4 (2021): 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211016931.Gamble, Andrew. “The Remaking of Conservatism: Boris Johnson and the Politics of Brexit.” The Political Quarterly 92, no. 3 (2021): 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13054.Gamble, Andrew. “The Remaking of Conservatism: Boris Johnson and the Politics of Brexit.” The Political Quarterly 92, no. 3 (2021): 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13054.Hayton, Richard. “Conservative Party Statecraft and the Johnson Government.” The Political Quarterly 92, no. 3 (2021): 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13006.Hayton, Richard. “Conservative Party Statecraft and the Johnson Government.” The Political Quarterly 92, no. 3 (2021): 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13006.Maher, Henry. “Neoliberalism Versus the Market? Liz Truss, Neoliberal Resilience, and Lacan’s Theory of the Four Discourses.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 26, no. 2 (2024): 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481231216704.Maher, Henry. “Neoliberalism Versus the Market? Liz Truss, Neoliberal Resilience, and Lacan’s Theory of the Four Discourses.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 26, no. 2 (2024): 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481231216704.Nishikawa-Pacher, Andreas. “Diplomacy Versus Politics: Two Mutually (In)Dependent Systems.” Political Studies Review 22, no. 3 (2023): 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299231169860.Nishikawa-Pacher, Andreas. “Diplomacy Versus Politics: Two Mutually (In)Dependent Systems.” Political Studies Review 22, no. 3 (2023): 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299231169860.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.