imiМеждународная аналитикаJournal of International Analytics2587-84762541-9633MGIMO University10.46272/2587-8476-2026-17-1-79-97imi-691Research ArticleИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИRESEARCH ARTICLESАнализ индо-бразильских и индо-аргентинских отношений: стратегический и экономический аспектыAnalysis of Indo-Brazilian and Indo-Argentine Relations: Strategic and Economic AspectsХаринаО. А.KharinaO. A.

Ольга Александровна Харина – к. полит. н., доцент Школы востоковедения факультета мировой экономики и мировой политики

119017, Москва, ул. Малая Ордынка, д. 17

Olga A. Kharina – PhD (Polit. Sci.), Associate Professor, School of Asian Studies, Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs

17, Malaya Ordynka street, Moscow, 119017

oa.kharina@hse.ruНИУ ВШЭРоссияNational Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University)Russian Federation2026210520261717997Copyright © Харина О.А., 20262026Харина О.А.Kharina O.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/691

Несмотря на давнюю историю взаимодействия, Индия и государства Латинской Америки на протяжении длительного времени не придавали своим отношениям большого значения. За последние два десятилетия заметно активизировались двусторонние и многосторонние связи Индии с Бразилией и Аргентиной. Этот сдвиг объясняется как изменениями в международной политической архитектуре, так и реформами внутри государств и сменой их политической элиты. Настоящее исследование ставит целью выявить сходства и различия в подходах Индии к взаимодействию с этими государствами. Анализ показал, что Индия дифференцирует стратегию: с Бразилией сотрудничество носит более широкомасштабный и институционализированный характер, оно охватывает торговлю, инвестиции, оборону, космическую сферу и участие в международных объединениях, тогда как с Аргентиной взаимодействие сосредоточено в аграрно-сырьевом секторе, фармацевтике, IT и отдельных стратегических проектах. Методологически работа основана на сравнительном анализе с использованием вторичных источников: официальных документов, статистических баз, экспертных комментариев и академических публикаций. Полученные результаты демонстрируют, что Индия успешно адаптирует свои подходы к экономическому и геополитическому потенциалу партнеров, что усиливает ее позиции в рамках стратегии Глобального юга.

Despite their long history of interaction, India and Latin American countries have not attached much importance to their relations for a long time. Over the past two decades, India’s bilateral and multilateral ties with Brazil and Argentina have become significantly more active. This shift can be explained by changes in the international political architecture, as well as reforms within the countries and changes in their political elites. This study aims to identify similarities and differences in India’s approaches to interaction with these countries. The analysis shows that India differentiates its strategy: with Brazil, cooperation is more broad-based and institutionalized, covering trade, investment, defense, space, and participation in international associations, while with Argentina, interaction focuses on the agricultural and raw materials sector, pharmaceuticals, IT, and specific strategic projects. Methodologically, the work is based on comparative analysis using secondary sources: official documents, statistical databases, expert commentary, and academic publications. The results show that India is successfully adapting its approaches to the economic and geopolitical potential of its partners, which strengthens its position within the Global South strategy.

АргентинаИндияБразилиясотрудничествоэкономические отношениястратегическое партнерствоГлобальный югэкономические связиArgentinaIndiaBrazilcooperationeconomic relationsstrategic partnershipGlobal Southeconomic tiesReferencesБорзова, А.Ю. Роль бразильского дипломата Араужо Кастро в развитии африканского вектора внешней политики страны // Африка: новая стратегическая реальность: ежегодник. 2020. С. 181–191.Borzova, Alla Yu. “The Role of Brazilian Diplomat Araujo Castro in the Development of the African Vector of the Country’s Foreign Policy.” Africa: New Strategic Reality: Yearbook (2020): 181–191 [In Russian].Ванина, Е.Ю. Индия: история в истории. М.: Наука, 2014. 343 с.Vanina, Eugenia Yu. India: History in History. Moscow: Nauka, 2014 [In Russian].Галищева, Н.В. Современная внешнеэкономическая стратегия Индии: сотрудничество «Юг-Юг» // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2011. № 5(20). С. 96–106. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2011-5-20-96-106.Galistcheva, Natalia V. “Contemporary External Economic Strategy of India: ‘South–South’ Cooperation.” MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 5(20) (2011): 96–106 [In Russian].Гриценко, И.А. Трансформация аргентино-американских отношений на рубеже десятилетий // Вестник Волгоградского государственного университета. Серия 4: История. Регионоведение. Международные отношения. 2022. Т. 27. № 2. С. 215–224. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2022.2.18.Gritsenko, Ilona A. “The Transformation of Argentine–U.S. Relations at the Turn of Decade.” Science Journal of VolSU. History. Area Studies. International Relations 27, no. 2 (2022): 215–224 [In Russian].Давыдов, В.М., Бобровников, А.В. Роль восходящих гигантов в мировой экономике и политике (шансы Бразилии и Мексики в глобальном измерении). М.: ИЛИЛА РАН, 2009.Davydov, Vladimir M., and Aleksandr V. Bobrovnikov. The Role of the Rising Giants in the World Economy and Politics (Chances of Brazil and Mexico in the Global Dimension). Moscow: ILA RAS, 2009 [In Russian].Лунев, С.И. Россия и Индия в Индо-Тихоокеанском регионе и фактор США // Актуальные проблемы Европы. 2020. № 1(105). С. 182–212. https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2020.01.09.Lunev, Sergey I. “Russia and India in the Indo-Pacific Region and the US Policy.” Current Problems of Europe, no. 1(105) (2020): 182–212 [In Russian].Мартынов, Б.Ф. Бразилия – гигант в глобализирующемся мире. М.: Наука, 2008.Martynov, Boris F. Braziliya – gigant v globaliziruyushchemsya mire. Moscow: Nauka, 2008 [In Russian].Окунева, Л.С. Бразилия: радикализация политического процесса (2013–2019 гг.) // Ибероамериканские тетради. 2019. № 3. С. 7–11. https://doi.org/10.46272/2409-3416-2019-3-7-11.Okuneva, Liudmila S. “Brazil: Radicalization of the Political Process (2013–2019).” Cuadernos Iberoamericanos, no. 3 (2019): 7–11 [In Russian].Шаумян, Т.Л. БРИКС как важный фактор международных отношений // Новая и новейшая история. 2020. № 1. С. 247–248. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013038640008197-4.Shaumyan, Tatyana L. “BRICS as an Important Factor in International Relations.” Novaia i noveishaia istoriia, no. 1 (2020): 247–248 [In Russian].Яковлев, П.П. Страны Латинской Америки в мировой торговле продовольствием. Международная торговля и торговая политика. 2022. Т. 8. № 1. С. 36–50. https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2022-1-36-50.Yakovlev, Petr P. “Latin American Countries in World Trade in Food Products.” International Trade and Trade Policy 8, no. 1 (2022): 36–50 [In Russian].Ahuja, Mamta. “Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on the Trade Between India and Argentina.” International Journal of Management Issues and Research 12, no. 2 (2023): 119–147. https://doi.org/10.69711/sharda.ijmir.v12i2.2306.Ahuja, Mamta. “Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on the Trade Between India and Argentina.” International Journal of Management Issues and Research 12, no. 2 (2023): 119–147. https://doi.org/10.69711/sharda.ijmir.v12i2.2306.Barros Silva, Lucca Viersa. “Os BRICS e a Atual Ordem Global: Revisionistas ou Conservadores?” Conjuntura Austral 8, no. 41 (2017): 26–38.Barros Silva, Lucca Viersa. “The BRICS and the Current Global Order: Revisionists or Conservatives?” Conjuntura Austral 8, no. 41 (2017): 26–38 [In Portuguese].Bekerman, Marta, Federico Dulcich, and Pedro Gaite. “Argentina’s Economic Relations with China and Their Impact on a Long-Term Production Strategy.” CEPAL Review 2022, no. 138 (2022): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.18356/16840348-2022-138-2.Bekerman, Marta, Federico Dulcich, and Pedro Gaite. “Argentina’s Economic Relations with China and Their Impact on a Long-Term Production Strategy.” CEPAL Review 2022, no. 138 (2022): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.18356/16840348-2022-138-2.Borisov, Denis A. “Countries of the Global South in the Arctic and Their Economic Interests.” Ekonomika i Upravlenie. Problemy Resheniya 7, no. 7 (2025): 70–77. https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.07.07.007.Borisov, Denis A. “Countries of the Global South in the Arctic and Their Economic Interests.” Ekonomika i Upravlenie. Problemy Resheniya 7, no. 7 (2025): 70–77. https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2025.07.07.007.Cortés, Carlos, Sly Haro Maria, and Olaopa R. Olawale. “India-Argentina Science and Technology Cooperation: A Case of Utilisation of Biomass as a Source of Energy.” Development Cooperation Review 2, no. 4 (2019): 1–35.Cortés, Carlos, Sly Haro Maria, and Olaopa R. Olawale. “India-Argentina Science and Technology Cooperation: A Case of Utilisation of Biomass as a Source of Energy.” Development Cooperation Review 2, no. 4 (2019): 1–35.Das, Arvind N. “Brazil and India: Comparing Notes on Liberalisation.” Economic and Political Weekly 29, no. 8 (1994): 416–419.Das, Arvind N. “Brazil and India: Comparing Notes on Liberalisation.” Economic and Political Weekly 29, no. 8 (1994): 416–419.Domínguez, Jorge I. “India-Latin America Relations, 2000–22: Their Encounter and Shared Gains.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 34, no. 4 (2023): 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2023.2270318.Domínguez, Jorge I. “India-Latin America Relations, 2000–22: Their Encounter and Shared Gains.” Diplomacy & Statecraft 34, no. 4 (2023): 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2023.2270318.Gaite, Pedro. “Del dicho al hecho. La política industrial argentina en la posconvertibilidad.” Estudios Económicos 40, no. 80 (2022): 131–164. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.estudecon.2023.3060.Gaite, Pedro. “From Words to Deeds. Argentina’s Industrial Policy in the Post-Convertibility Era.” Estudios Económicos 40, no. 80 (2022): 131–164 [In Spanish].Hirst, Mo´nica. “Brazil–India Relations: A Reciprocal Learning Process.” South Asian Survey 15, no. 1 (2008): 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152310801500109.Hirst, Mo´nica. “Brazil–India Relations: A Reciprocal Learning Process.” South Asian Survey 15, no. 1 (2008): 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152310801500109.Kharina, Olga. “Relaciones indo-brasileñas: intereses nacionales y problemas de cooperación.” Iberoamerica, no. 3 (2023): 142–162. https://doi.org/10.37656/s20768400-2023-3-07.Kharina, Olga. “Indo-Brazilian Relations: National Interests and Cooperation Problems.” Iberoamerica, no. 3 (2023): 142–162 [In Spanish].Kumari, Mamta. “India-MERCOSUR Preferential Trade Agreement: An Ex-Post Evaluation under Modern Gravity Framework.” The Journal of Economic Integration 40, no. 2 (2025): 367–390. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2024054.Kumari, Mamta. “India-MERCOSUR Preferential Trade Agreement: An Ex-Post Evaluation under Modern Gravity Framework.” The Journal of Economic Integration 40, no. 2 (2025): 367–390. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2024054.De Coning, Cedric, Thomas Mandrup, and Liselotte Odgaard. The BRICS and Coexistence: An Alternative Vision of World Order. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015.De Coning, Cedric, Thomas Mandrup, and Liselotte Odgaard. The BRICS and Coexistence: An Alternative Vision of World Order. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015.Sergunin, Alexander. Explaining Russian Foreign Policy Behavior: Theory and Practice. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag, 2016.Sergunin, Alexander. Explaining Russian Foreign Policy Behavior: Theory and Practice. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag, 2016.Singh, Shantesh Kumar, and Ravi Shankar Raj. “India– Argentina Relations as Middle Powers: A Soft Power Perspective.” Global Affairs – Annual Review, no. 1 (2024): 457–481.Singh, Shantesh Kumar, and Ravi Shankar Raj. “India– Argentina Relations as Middle Powers: A Soft Power Perspective.” Global Affairs – Annual Review, no. 1 (2024): 457–481.Stuenkel, Oliver. “The Case for Stronger Brazil–India Relations.” Indian Foreign Affairs Journal 5, no. 3 (2010): 290–304.Stuenkel, Oliver. “The Case for Stronger Brazil–India Relations.” Indian Foreign Affairs Journal 5, no. 3 (2010): 290–304.Vazquez, Karin Costa. Brazil–India Relations: Beyond the 70 Years. Rio de Janeiro: FUNAG, 2019.Vazquez, Karin Costa. Brazil–India Relations: Beyond the 70 Years. Rio de Janeiro: FUNAG, 2019.Wolfenson, Gustavo Ferrari. “Argentina: Democracy and International Relations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 20, no. 3 (1987): 679–684.Wolfenson, Gustavo Ferrari. “Argentina: Democracy and International Relations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 20, no. 3 (1987): 679–684.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.