<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">imi</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Международная аналитика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Journal of International Analytics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2587-8476</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2541-9633</issn><publisher><publisher-name>MGIMO University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46272/2587-8476-2026-17-1-123-142</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">imi-693</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКИЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>«Глобальная Британия» после брекзита: новые формы международного функционирования</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>“Global Britain” after Brexit: New Forms of International Application</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Менчиков</surname><given-names>Д. Ю.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Menchikov</surname><given-names>D. Yu.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Менчиков Даниил Юрьевич – соискатель Кафедры прикладного анализа международных проблем, старший преподаватель МПГУ</p><p>119454, Москва, проспект Вернадского, 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Daniil Yu. Menchikov – PhD Fellow, Department of Applied International Analysis</p><p>76, Vernadsky avenue, Moscow, 119454</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Подворко</surname><given-names>М. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Podvorko</surname><given-names>M. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Подворко Мария Сергеевна – студентка магистратуры Миланского университета, студентка магистратуры международно-правового факультета Одинцовского филиала МГИМО МИД России</p><p>119454, Москва, проспект Вернадского, 76</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mariya S. Podvorko – Master’s Student, University of Milan</p><p>76, Vernadsky avenue, Moscow, 119454</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">miss_mary02@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">МГИМО МИД России<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">MGIMO University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>123</fpage><lpage>142</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Менчиков Д.Ю., Подворко М.С., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Менчиков Д.Ю., Подворко М.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Menchikov D.Y., Podvorko M.S.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/693">https://www.interanalytics.org/jour/article/view/693</self-uri><abstract><p>Целью статьи является исследование формирования, эволюции и практического применения внешнеполитической концепции «Глобальная Британия», а также соотнесение этой концепции со сложившейся моделью отношений с Евросоюзом, в том числе применительно к формированию европейской системы безопасности. Авторы рассматривают вопрос о месте и роли Соединенного Королевства в мировой политике после выхода из Европейского союза. Сделан вывод о сложностях при позиционировании Британии как в отношениях с США, где приходится учитывать «феномен Трампа», так и в отношениях с ЕС, где после подписания Соглашения о выходе из ЕС и Соглашения о сотрудничестве и торговле Британия занимает невыгодную позицию. Принимаются во внимание и перспективы усиления Британии на мировой арене. Кроме того, авторы приходят к выводу об отсутствии полноценного межпартийного консенсуса между консерваторами и лейбористами относительно концепции «Глобальная Британия» в силу различных подходов этих партий к внешней политике. В заключительной части статьи сделаны прогнозы о внешней политике Британии, в частности о динамике отношений с ЕС после прихода к власти лейбористов на парламентских выборах 2024 г., а также о роли Соединенного Королевства в системе европейской безопасности. В качестве методов использованы контент-анализ, прогнозирование, а также синтез. Новизна исследования состоит в рассмотрении межпартийного консенсуса применительно к концепции «Глобальная Британия», а также в соотнесении концепции со складывающейся моделью отношений Британии с ЕС. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The aim of this article is to examine the formation and evolution of the “Global Britain” foreign policy concept, its practical application, and its correlation with the model of relations between the UK and the European Union, including the formation of a European security system. The authors examine the place and role of the UK in the world after Brexit. They conclude that the country faces challenges in its positioning both in relations with the United States, where “the Trump phenomenon” must be taken into account, and in the UK–EU relations, where, following the signing of the EU–UK Withdrawal Agreement and the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, Great Britain occupies a disadvantageous position. At the same time, the authors also consider the prospects for Britain‘s strengthening on the global stage. Furthermore, they conclude that there is a lack of full cross-party consensus between the Conservatives and the Labour on “Global Britain” due to their different foreign policy attitudes. The final section of the article offers predictions about British foreign policy, particularly the dynamics of relations with the EU after the Labour’s coming to power in 2024, as well as the United Kingdom‘s role in the European security system. The methods used include content analysis, forecasting, and synthesis. The study‘s novelty lies in its examination of the cross-party consensus on the concept of “Global Britain,” its correlation with the emerging model of the UK-EU relations.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>«Глобальная Британия»</kwd><kwd>брекзит</kwd><kwd>«феномен Трампа»</kwd><kwd>отношения Британии и ЕС</kwd><kwd>Соглашение о торговле и сотрудничестве</kwd><kwd>система европейской безопасности</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Global Britain</kwd><kwd>Brexit</kwd><kwd>Trump phenomenon</kwd><kwd>UK-EU relations</kwd><kwd>Trade and Cooperation Agreement</kwd><kwd>European security</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ананьева, Е.В., Годованюк, К.А. Стратегия национальной безопасности Британии: замыслы и воплощение // Европейская аналитика – 2021 / под общ. ред. К.Н. Гусева. М.: ИЕ РАН; СПб.: Нестор-История, 2021. С. 85–97. http://doi.org/10.15211/978-5-98163-178-8.08.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ananieva, Elena V., and Kira A. Godovanyuk. “UK National Security Strategy.” In European Analytics 2021, edited by Kirill N. Gusev, 85–97. Moscow: IE RAS; Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Historia, 2021 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Андреева, Т.Н. Отношения между Великобританией и ЕС в период брекзита: военно-политический аспект // Стратегическая автономия ЕС и перспективы сотрудничества с Россией / под ред. Н.К. Арбатовой, А.М. Кокеева. М.: Весь мир, 2020. С. 93–113.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Andreeva, Tatiana N. “Otnosheniya mezhdu Velikobritaniei i ES v period brekzita: voennopoliticheskii aspekt.” In Strategicheskaya avtonomiya ES i perspektivy sotrudnichestva s Rossiei, edited by Nadezhda K. Arbatova, and Alexander M. Kokeev, 93–113. Moscow: Ves’ Mir, 2020 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бабынина, Л.О. Соглашение о торговле и сотрудничестве ЕС и Великобритании: между кондициональностью и суверенитетом // Современная Европа. 2021. № 2. С. 5–16. http://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope220210516.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Babynina, Liudmila O. “Trade and Cooperation Agreement Between the EU and the UK: Conditionality Versus Sovereignty.” Contemporary Europe – Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 2 (2021): 5–16 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Годованюк, К.А. «Глобальная Британия» в преддверии брекзита. М.: Институт Европы РАН, 2020a. http://doi.org/10.15211/report62020_373.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Godovanyuk, Kira A. “Global Britain” in the Run-Up to Brexit. Moscow: IE RAS, 2020a [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Годованюк, К.А. Проблема нелегальной миграции через Ла-Манш // Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. № 5. 2020b. C. 92–98. http://doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran520209298.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Godovanyuk, Kira A. “The Problem of Illegal Channel-Crossing.” Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN, no. 5 (2020b): 92–98 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Годованюк, К.А. Старт торговых переговоров США и Великобритании // Аналитические записки Института Европы РАН. № 28. 2020c. С. 1–6. http://doi.org/10.15211/analytics282020.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Godovanyuk, Kira A. “Start torgovykh peregovorov SSHA i Velikobritanii.” Analytical Papers of the Institute of Europe RAS, no. 28 (2020c): 1–6. [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Десаи, Р., Фриман, Р. Brexit, сити и кризис консерватизма. М.: Международный дискуссионный клуб «Валдай», 2016.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Desai, Radhika, and Alan Freeman. Brexit, City and the Crisis of Conservatism. Moscow: Valdai Discussion Club, 2016 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Журкин, В.В., Носов, М.Г. 20-летие военного измерения ЕС // Современная Европа. 2019. № 1. С. 5–13. http://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope120190513.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhurkin, Vitaly V., and Mikhail G. Nosov. “20 years of the EU Military Dimension.” Contemporary Europe – Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 1 (2019): 5–13 [In Russian]</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кавешников, Н.Ю. Великобритания и Европейский Союз: долгая история развода. Статья 1. Европейский вопрос // Современная Европа. 2018a. № 5. С. 5–16. http://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope520180516.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaveshnikov, Nikolay Yu. “United Kingdom and European Union: A Long History of Divorce. Article 1. European Issue.” Contemporary Europe – Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 5 (2018a): 5–16 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кавешников, Н.Ю. Великобритания и Европейский Союз: долгая история развода. Статья 2. Сложный партнер // Современная Европа. 2018b. № 6. С. 18–29. http://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope620181829.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaveshnikov, Nikolay Yu. “United Kingdom and European Union: A Long History of Divorce. Article 2. Awkward Partner.” Contemporary Europe – Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 6 (2018b): 18–29 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кавешников, Н.Ю. Некоторые последствия Brexit для развития Европейского союза // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2016. № 6. С. 24–30. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-6-51-24-30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaveshnikov, Nikolay Yu. “Possible Outcomes of Brexit for European Union Development.” MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 6 (2016): 24–30 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Медушевский, А.Н. Европейский Союз после Брексита: итоги и перспективы интеграционного проекта // Вопросы теоретической экономики. 2022. № 4. С. 110–133. https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2022_4_110_133.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Medushevskiy, Andrei N. “European Union after Brexit: Results and Prospects of the Integration Project.” Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki, no. 4 (2022): 110–133 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Охошин, О.В. Проблема североирландской границы: «ящик Пандоры» для Великобритании и ЕС // Пути к миру и безопасности. 2019. № 1. С. 34–46. https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2019-1-34-46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Okhoshin, Oleg V. “Problema severoirlandskoi granitsy: ‘yashchik Pandory’ dlya Velikobritanii i ES.” Pathways to Peace and Security, no. 1 (2019): 34–46 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Синдеев, А.А. Подходы европейских политологов к будущим системам безопасности. М.: ИЕ РАН, 2024. http://doi.org/10.15211/report82024_414.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sindeev, Alexey A. Approaches of European Political Scientists to Future Security Systems. Moscow: IE RAS, 2024 [In Russian].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Breslin, Shaun, and Peter Burnham. “International Order Transition and the UK’s Tilt to the ‘Indo-Pacific’.” The Pacific Review 36, no. 2 (2023): 406–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2160796.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Breslin, Shaun, and Peter Burnham. “International Order Transition and the UK’s Tilt to the ‘Indo-Pacific’.” The Pacific Review 36, no. 2 (2023): 406–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2022.2160796.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brooks, Rachel, and Johanna Waters. “Global Britain and Cosmopolitan Nationalism.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 46, no. 1 (2025): 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2024.243633.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brooks, Rachel, and Johanna Waters. “Global Britain and Cosmopolitan Nationalism.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 46, no. 1 (2025): 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2024.243633.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chepik, Viktor N. “Great Miscalculation of David Cameron.” Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History 63, no. 1 (2018): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2018.119.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chepik, Viktor N. “Great Miscalculation of David Cameron.” Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. History 63, no. 1 (2018): 301–310. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu02.2018.119.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Daddow, Oliver. “GlobalBritainTM: The Discursive Construction of Britain’s Post-Brexit World Role.” Global Affairs 5, no. 1 (2019): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2019.1599297.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Daddow, Oliver. “GlobalBritainTM: The Discursive Construction of Britain’s Post-Brexit World Role.” Global Affairs 5, no. 1 (2019): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2334 0460.2019.1599297.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Devanny, Joe, and Philip Berry. “‘Gulf Security Is Our Security’: Global Britain and UK Gulf Strategy, 2010–20.” Defence Studies 21, no. 2 (2021): 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2021.1874244.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Devanny, Joe, and Philip Berry. “‘Gulf Security Is Our Security’: Global Britain and UK Gulf Strategy, 2010–20.” Defence Studies 21, no. 2 (2021): 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2021.1874244.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heppell, Timothy. “Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes Within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15, no. 3 (2013): 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heppell, Timothy. “Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes Within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15, no. 3 (2013): 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Heron, Tony, Gabriel Siles-Brügge, and Darrin McDonald. “Performing Trade: ‘Global Britain’ and the UK’s Post-Brexit Free Trade Agreements with Australia and New Zealand.” Review of International Political Economy 32, no. 5 (2025): 1468–1491. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2489078.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Heron, Tony, Gabriel Siles-Brügge, and Darrin McDonald. “Performing Trade: ‘Global Britain’ and the UK’s Post-Brexit Free Trade Agreements with Australia and New Zealand.” Review of International Political Economy 32, no. 5 (2025): 1468–1491. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2025.2489078.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Honeyman, Victoria. “From Liberal Interventionism to Liberal Conservatism: The Short Road in Foreign Policy from Blair to Cameron.” British Politics 12, no. 1 (2017): 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Honeyman, Victoria. “From Liberal Interventionism to Liberal Conservatism: The Short Road in Foreign Policy from Blair to Cameron.” British Politics 12, no. 1 (2017): 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Langan, Mark. Global Britain and Neo-Colonialism in Africa: Brexit, ‘Development’ and Coloniality. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Langan, Mark. Global Britain and Neo-Colonialism in Africa: Brexit, ‘Development’ and Coloniality. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Martill, Benjamin, and Angelos Chryssogelos. “You’re Projecting! Global Britain, European Strategic Autonomy and the Discursive Rescue of the Internationalised State.” European Security 34, no. 3 (2025): 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2024.2425641.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Martill, Benjamin, and Angelos Chryssogelos. “You’re Projecting! Global Britain, European Strategic Autonomy and the Discursive Rescue of the Internationalised State.” European Security 34, no. 3 (2025): 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2024.2425641.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Połońska-Kimunguyi, Eva, and Patrick Kimunguyi. “‘Gunboats of Soft Power’: Boris on Africa and Post-Brexit ‘Global Britain’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30, no. 4 (2017): 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1432565.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Połońska-Kimunguyi, Eva, and Patrick Kimunguyi. “‘Gunboats of Soft Power’: Boris on Africa and PostBrexit ‘Global Britain’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30, no. 4 (2017): 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2018.1432565.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ranjan, Prabhash. “India-UK Investment Relations and ‘Global Britain’.” King’s Law Journal 34, no. 1 (2023): 120–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2023.2187616.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ranjan, Prabhash. “India-UK Investment Relations and ‘Global Britain’.” King’s Law Journal 34, no. 1 (2023): 120–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2023.2187 616.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rauta, Vladimir, and Sean Monaghan. “Global Britain in the Grey Zone: Between Stagecraft and Statecraft.” Contemporary Security Policy 42, no. 4 (2021): 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1980984.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rauta, Vladimir, and Sean Monaghan. “Global Britain in the Grey Zone: Between Stagecraft and Statecraft.” Contemporary Security Policy 42, no. 4 (2021): 475–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2021.1980984.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saunders, Robert. “Brexit and Empire: ‘Global Britain’ and the Myth of Imperial Nostalgia.” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 48, no. 6 (2020): 1140–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2020.1848403.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saunders, Robert. “Brexit and Empire: ‘Global Britain’ and the Myth of Imperial Nostalgia.” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 48, no. 6 (2020): 1140–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2020.18 48403.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Uygun, Ayse Gulce, and Cemre Pekcan. “UK-China Relations: Global Britain in a Competitive Age and China as the Systemic Competitor.” Journal of Applied And Theoretical Social Sciences 4, no. 4 (2022): 503–518. https://doi.org/10.37241/jatss.2022.80.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uygun, Ayse Gulce, and Cemre Pekcan. “UK-China Relations: Global Britain in a Competitive Age and China as the Systemic Competitor.” Journal of Applied And Theoretical Social Sciences 4, no. 4 (2022): 503–518. https://doi.org/10.37241/jatss.2022.80.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yu, Andrew. “Hong Kong, CANZUK, and Commonwealth: The United Kingdom’s Role in Defending Freedom and the Global Order under ‘Global Britain’.” The Round Table 111, no. 4 (2022): 516–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2022.2105532.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yu, Andrew. “Hong Kong, CANZUK, and Commonwealth: The United Kingdom’s Role in Defending Freedom and the Global Order under ‘Global Britain’.” The Round Table 111, no. 4 (2022): 516–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2022.2105532.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
