Does the US program of Conventional Prompt Global Strike threaten Russian national security?

The article analyses a concept of Conventional Prompt Global Strike aimed at developing weapons systems that can deliver a conventional warhead anywhere in the world within an hour as a prioritized part of the US military strategy. The Pentagon planners believe that deployment of CPGS weapon would allow a selective and far more effective response to post-cold war threats, such as international terrorist networks, “rogue states” and other adversaries, thus drastically reducing reliance on nuclear deterrent in a number of situations. Over the years the Pentagon’s R&D activities in this area encompassed numerous established and emerging weapon technologies, including use of surface-launched and sea-launched strategic missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles. The CPGS program is raising serious concerns in Moscow, where Russian officials consider it as a threat to Russia’s strategic nuclear arsenals and national security interests alongside with the US plans to develop and deploy global ballistic missile defense capabilities and attack weapons in space. Moscow predicts it could undermine strategic balance and trigger a nonnuclear arms race.

1. Эктон Дж.М. Серебряная пуля? Правильные вопросы о неядерном быстром глобальном ударе / Пер. с англ. [рус. версия доклада] под ред. Е. Мясникова. – М.: Московский центр Карнеги, 2014.

2. Ford Ch. A. Conventional ‘Replacement’ of Nuclear Weapons? URL: http://www. newparadigmsforum.com/NPFtestsite/?p=546

3. National Research Council of the National Academies. U.S. Conventional Prompt Global Strike: Issues for 2008 and Beyond. – Washington, DC, August 2008. URL: http://www.nap.edu / read/12061/chapter/5#71.

4. Rumsfeld D. Foreford // U.S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report 2002. URL: http://fas.org/sgp/news/2002/01/npr-foreword.html

5. U. S. Department of Defense, Nuclear Posture Review Report 2010. URL: http://www. defense. gov/Portals/1/features/defenseReviews/NPR/2010_Nuclear_Posture_Review_Report.pdf

6. U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. – Washington, DC, January 2002. URL: http://www.comw.org/qdr/qdr2001.pdf

7. U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC, February 2006. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/dod/qdr-2006-report.pdf.

8. U. S. Department of Defense, Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC, February 2010. URL: http://www.comw.org/qdr/fulltext/1002QDR2010.pdf

9. Woolf A. F. Conventional Warheads for Long-Range Ballistic Missiles: Background and Issues for Congress. URL: http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/81935.pdf