Chinese Reaction and Interpretation of 1991 Events in the Soviet Union

The article is timed to coincide with two anniversaries: centenary of the Communist Party of China, and thirty years since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. According to the author’s idea, these two anniversaries correlate: analysis of the reasons and consequences of the USSR dissolution became one of the factors of current policy of Chinese communists. The article brings light to this coherence. A wide range of Chinese sources and literature regarding 1991 events in the USSR was used for the article. Another feature is the attention to historical context of the late 1980s – early 1990s, analysis of which helps to understand domination of conservative view to the USSR dissolution. The article shows how the Chinese state and party interest in the Soviet experience led to creation of a large bulk of works regarding historical, sociological and culturological aspects of the USSR dissolution. The analysis of the most impactful of these works shows a wide range of views regarding certain aspects (fi rst of all, the role of reforms in the fi nal dissolution of the state) and consensus regarding other aspects (negative role of Mikhail Gorbachev, labelling the dissolution of the USSR and the Communist Party as a ‘catastrophe’). Further analysis of the Soviet experience led to such measures by the Chinese leadership like strengthening of partocracy regime, conducting of media-covered anti-smuggling campaigns, establishing of harsh administrative and security control in areas with ethnic minorities, active counterpropaganda and struggling with foreign information infl uence. Appellation to the negative experience of the USSR and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is using by the Chinese leadership in its propaganda as an argument for unacceptability of any political reforms regarding weakening of the party role.

1. Gibel’ starshego brata] Russia in the Global Aff airs, no. 5 (2012): 37–49 [In Russian].

2. Galenovich, Yury M. Chinese Funeral Reception for CPSU and USSR. [Kitajskiye pominki po KPSS i SSSR] Moscow: Vostochnaya kniga, 2011 [In Russian].

3. Do i posle Tyananmenya: kak sobytiya v SSSR vliyali na Kitaj] Carnegie Moscow Center, 2019 [In Russian].

4. Zuenko, Ivan Yu. “Last Lesson of Elder Brother: Political Reform in China and Soviet Perestroika.” [Poslednij urok starshego brata: problema politicheskoj reformy v Kitaje i perestroika v SSSR] Russia and the Pacifi c, no. 4 (2015): 58–71 [In Russian].

5. Ivanov, Sergei A. The Winneris Always Right: Sources on Genesis and Initial Stage of Chinese Reforms [Pobeditelej ne sudyat: istochniki o genezise i nachal’nom etape kitajskikh reform] Proceedings of the Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology FEB RAS, no. 4 (2020): 51–70 [In Russian].

6. Ivanov, Sergei A. “Why Communist Regime in China Survived 1989.” [Pochemu kommunis-ticheskij rezhim v Kitaje perezhil 1989 g.] Russia and the Pacifi c, no. 3 (2016): 49–65 [In Russian].

7. Karpov, Mikhail V. Economic Reforms and Political Struggle in China (1984-1989). [Ekonomicheskije reform i politicheskaja bor’ba v KNR (1984-1989)] Moscow: Moscow State University, 1997 [In Russian].

8. Lukin, Alexandr V. The Bear is Watching the Dragon: Image of China in Russia in XVII–XXI centuries. [Medved nablyudajet za drakonom. Obraz Kitaja v Rossii v XVII–XXI vekakh] Moscow: Vostok-Zapad, 2007 [In Russian].

9. Medvedev, Roy A. “China and the Collapse of the USSR.” [Kitaj i raspad SSSR] The Problems of the Far East, no. 1 (2011): 166–174 [In Russian].

10. Nikiforova, Valentina A. “Chinese Reaction to the Collapse of the USSR.” [Reaktsiya KNR na raspad SSSR] In Society and State in China: XLI scientifi c conference materials, 2011, 200–204 [In Russian].

11. Xu, Haiyang. “30th Anniversary of Soviet Perestroika: Estimates of Chinese Scholars.” [Tridtsatiletije perestroiki v SSSR: otsenki kitajskikh uchenykh] Russia and the Pacifi c, no. 4 (2015): 48–57 [In Russian].

12. Jiang, Zemin. Reform, Development, Stability. Papers and Speeches. [Reforma, razvitiye, stabilnost. Statji i vystuplenija] Moscow: Paleya-Mishin, 2001 [In Russian].

13. Bazhanov, Evgeny. “Metamorphoses of the Kremlin’s China Policy.” In Actual Problems of International Relations, vol. 2. Moscow: Nauchnaya kniga, 2002.

14. Bernstein, Thomas. “Resilience and Collapse in China and the Soviet Union.” In Why Communism Did Not Collapse: Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe, edited by M. Dimitrov, 40–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

15. Bush, George, and Brent Scowcroft. A World Transformed. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999. Coase, Ronald, and Wang Ning. How China Became Capitalist. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

16. Fewsmith, Joseph. China since Tiananmen: From Deng Xiaoping to Hu Jintao. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

17. Meisels, Greer A. “What China Learned from the Soviet Union’s Fall.” The Diplomat, July 27, 2012. https://thediplomat.com/2012/07/what-china-learned-from-the-soviet-unions-fall/.

18. Palmer, James. “What China Didn’t Learn from the Collapse of the Soviet Union.” Foreign Policy, December 24, 2016. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/12/24/what-china-didnt-learn-from-the-collapse-of-the-soviet-union/.

19. Shambaugh, David. China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. Berkeley, University of California Press; Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2008.

20. Waldron, Arthur. “Chinese Analyses of Soviet Failure: The Dictatorship of the Proletariat.” The Jamestown Foundation China Brief, no. 10 (15) (2010). https://jamestown.org/program/chinese-analyses-of-soviet-failure-the-dictatorship-of-the-proletariat/.

21. Waldron, Arthur. “Chinese Analyses of Soviet Failure: The Party.” The Jamestown Foundation China Brief, no. 9 (23) (2009). https://jamestown.org/program/chinese-analyses-of-soviet-failure-the-party.

22. Zhao, Ziyang. Prisoner of the State: The Secret Journal of Premier Zhao Ziyang, edited and translated by Bao Pu, Renee Chang, and Adi Ignatius. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2009.

23. Zubok, Vladislav “The Soviet Union and China in the 1980s: Reconciliation and Divorce.” Cold War History, no. 17 (2017): 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2017.1315923.

24. Jiang, Changbin. “Review of Gorbachev Reforms after 20 years.” Lilun shiye, no. 9 (2007): 52–56 [In Chinese].

25. Lu, Nanquan, Huang Weiding, and Sheng Zhihua. “Who Destroyed the Soviet Union?” Aisixiang, 2012.http://www.aisixiang.com/data/48844-2.html [In Chinese].

26. Collapse of the USSR: Memories and Refl exation after 20�years�edited by Li Shenming. Beijing: Shehui kexueyuan chubanshe, 2011 [In Chinese].

27. New Researches of the USSR Collapse. Beijing: Shijie zhishi chubanshe, 1998 [In Chinese].

28. Historic Analysis of the USSR Evolution. Beijing: Sheke wenxian chubanshe, 1994 [In Chinese].

29. Wang, Changjiang. Lessons of Degradation of CPSU. Zhengzhou: Henan renmin chubanshe, 2012 [In Chinese].

30. Wu, Enyuan. “Critical Analysis of Popular Representations about ‘Lessons of the USSR Collapse.’” Makesizhuiyi yanjiu, no. 23 (2002): 70–76] [In Chinese]. Wu Enyuan. “Correct Understanding of the Soviet Model.” Lilun qianyan, no. 19 (2007): 8–9 [In Chinese].

31. Zuo, Fengrong. “Reasons of the USSR Collapse from the Point of View of Foreign Policy Strategy.” Eluosi yanjiu, no. 2 (2003): 10–15 [In Chinese].

32. Zuo, Fengrong. “Analysis of Morale and Politics During Gorbachev Reforms.” Guoshi canyue ziliao, no. 4 (2008): 42–46 [In Chinese].

33. Zuo, Fengrong. “The Most Difficult Page of Soviet History. The USSR History, Volume 9: Specifi cs of Gorbachev Reforms.” Tansuo yu zhengming, no. 5 (2014): 85–87 [In Chinese].

34. Zuo, Fengrong. “Why the USSR didn’t Choose Chinese Model.” Lingdaowensui, no. 2 (2011): 28–30 [In Chinese]