The Costs of Global Leadership and Neighborhood International Politics

The article examines the trends in international relations that have emerged in recent years, including during the pandemic. According to the author, a clear international space structure in the vein of Immanuel Wallerstein’s world-system, with equally clear rules of the game in such space is associated with the presence of an enforcer. The enforcer here is a country or group of countries that impose certain forms of communication on the international space, making the behavior of agents of the international political space predictable. Such a position for the enforcer, among other things, makes it possible to obtain benefi ts (material and status ones) that exceed its costs. This situation was not least determined by the relative homogeneity of the international space actors (States). However, in reality, as shown in the article, there are many more variants of polities in the world, which, under certain conditions, were convenient to imitate state political institutions. The conditions change is leading to actualization of such polities. The actualization of diversity results in a sharp escalation of the enforcer’s costs, a drop in their eff ectiveness and the attractiveness of the enforcer’s position itself. The leader bears more and more signifi cant costs ceases to perform its functions. Here, in place of the institutional system set by the enforcer, comes a diff erent way of organizing international relations – interpersonal trust, which arises and is strengthened by personal communication. Until recently, such “decisionmakers’ clubs” were not as bright as the enforcer, but they connected the global world. However, the pandemic also disrupts this type of communication or rather complicates it. As a result, the hierarchy of problems changes. The problems of domestic politics and the international problems that aff ect them come to the fore. Global politics is being replaced by “neighborhood” politics. In the age of the world without a global leader and regional players rivalry, tomorrows “weight” of one country depends on how eff ectively it will be able to fi t in the new type of political structure.

1. Iskusstvo neupravlyaemoj zhizni. Dal’nii Vostok] Mosсcow: Evropa, 2014 [In Russian].

2. Volkov, V.V. Power Entrepreneurship: an Economic and Sociological Analysis. [Silovoe predprinimatel’stvo: ekonomiko-sociologicheskij analiz] Moscow: Izd-vo GU-VSHE, 2005 [In Russian].

3. Grinin, L.E. “The Chinese Model and Prospects for China's Leadership in the World.” [Kitajskaya model' i perspektivy liderstva Kitaya v mire] The Age of globalization, no. 2 (2012): 43–61 [In Russian].

4. Kaspe, Svyatoslav. Centers and Hierarchies, Spatial Metaphors of Power, and the Western Political Form. [Centry i ierarhii, prostranstvennye metafory vlasti i zapadnaya politicheskaya forma] Moscow: Moscow School of Political Studies, 2007 [In Russian].

5. Kohova, S.V., and A.G. Suharev. India: a Course for Global Leadership in Information Technology. India's Public Policy on Software Development and its Results. [Indiya: kurs na mirovoe liderstvo v oblasti informacionnyh tekhnologij. Gosudarstvennaya politika Indii v oblasti razrabotki programmnogo obespecheniya i ee plody] Moscow: Moscow University Press, 2001 [In Russian].

6. Krivushin, I.V. One Hundred Days in the Grip of Madness: The 1994 Rwandan Genocide. [Sto dnej vo vlasti bezumiya: Ruandijskij genocid 1994 g.] Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2015 [In Russian].

7. Kruglova, E.A. “‘State' is Obsolete: the Need for a New Defi nition of the State.” [Gosudarstvo ustarelo: potrebnost' v novom opredelenii gosudarstva] Journal of Institutional Studies, no. 2 (2015): 99–108 [In Russian].

8. Loginov, E.L., Loginov, A.E. “The Global Crisis as a New Format of the Struggle for World Economic Leadership.” [Global'nyj krizis kak novyj format bor'by za mirovoe ekonomicheskoe liderstvo] Finance and Credit, no. 18 (2010): 22–27 [In Russian].

9. Luzyanin, S.G., Afonaseva, A.V. “Belt and Road Initiative – Political and Economic Dimensions.” [Odin poyas, odin put' – politicheskie i ekonomicheskie izmereniya] Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Economy, no. 40 (2017): 5–14 [In Russian].

10. Parenkov, Daniil, and Kirill Petrov. “Coronavirus and Politics: Demands and Values in the Age of the Pandemic.” [Koronavirus i politika: zaprosy i cennosti v epohu pandemii] Journal of International Analytics 11, no. 2 (2020):109–121 [In Russian].

11. Sassen, Saskia. “Bringing the Global Economy into Action: the Role of National States and Private Factors.” [Privedenie global'noj ekonomiki v dejstvie: rol' nacional'nyh gosudarstv i chastnyh faktorov] International Journal of Social Sciences, no. 28 (2000): 167–175 [In Russian].

12. Sergeev, V.M., A.S. Kuzmin, V.D. Nechaev, and E.S. Alekseenkova. “Trust and Spatial Interaction of Social Networks.” [Doverie i prostranstvennoe vzaimodejstvie social'nyh setej] Polis, no. 2 (2007): 8–17 [In Russian].

13. Slizovski, D.E., E.N. Ozhiganov, S.O. Alekhnovich. “Strategic Analysis and Forecasting of Political Processes.” [Strategicheskij analiz i prognozirovanie politicheskih processov] Vestnik RUDN, no. 4. (2008): 98–108 [In Russian].

14. Filippov, Aleksander. “The Relevance of Hobbes’ Philosophy.” [Aktual'nost' fi losofi i Gobbsa] Sociological Review, no. 3 (2009): 113–123 [In Russian].

15. Kharkevich, Maxim. “Rogue States as an Image of the “Other” in World Politics. [Gosudarstva-izgoi kak obraz «drugogo» v mirovoj politike] Polis, no. 4 (2009): 99–110 [In Russian].

16. Shugalej, M.A., I.S. Burikova, O.V. Suhanov, and A.I. Yur’ev, ed. Tripoli as a Social Elevator for ISIL (terrorist organization). [Tripoli kak social’nyj lift dlya IGIL (terroristicheskaya organizaciya). [In Russian].

17. Yungblud, V.T. “The 1945 World Order – Process with «Open» Continuation.” [Mirovoi poryadok 1945 g. – protsess s «otkrytym» prodolzheniem] MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 13 (2020): 52–79 [In Russian].

18. Bauman, Zygmunt. City of Fears, City of Hopes. London: Goldsmith’s College, 2003.

19. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower. New York: Basic Books, 2007.

20. Call, Charles T. “Beyond the ‘Failed State’: Toward Conceptual Alternatives.” European Journal of International Relations 17, no. 2 (June 2011): 303– 26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109353137.

21. DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48, no. 2 (1983): 147–60. doi:10.2307/2095101.

22. Fukuyama, Francis. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.

23. Kаgan, Robert. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. New York: Vintage, 2003.

24. Langer, Máximo. “Universal Jurisdiction is Not Disappearing: The Shift from ‘Global Enforcer’ to ‘No Safe Haven’ Universal Jurisdiction.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 13, no. 2 (May 2015): 245–256, https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqv009.

25. Melville, Andrei, ed. Political Atlas of the Modern World: An Experiment in Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of the Political Systems of Modern States. Preprint. Moscow: MGIMO – University Press, 2009.

26. North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575839.

27. Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Actions. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.

28. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable. London: Penguin Books Ltd., 2010.

29. Urry, John. “Globalising the Tourist Gaze,” published by the Department of Sociology, the Lancaster University, Lancaster, 2001. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Urry-Globalising-the-Tourist-Gaze.pdf.

30. Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice, and Terence K. Hopkins. World-Systems Analysis: Theory and Methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1982.

31. Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. The End of the World as we Know It: Social Science for the Twenty-first Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.

32.