The Open End of the War of Yugoslav Legacy: the Consequences of the Dissolution of the SFRY Three Decades Later
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-1-74-95
Abstract
The article examines the dynamics and prospects of resolving the main confl icts in the Western Balkans three decades after the collapse of Yugoslavia. The most important factors infl uencing the confl ict dynamics in the region are ethnonationalism, ethnic homogenization and external interference. Western intervention made it possible to stop hostilities, but at the same time it actually consolidated the results of ethnic homogenization. The Serbo-Croatian confl ict is close to its exhaustion due to the actual support of the West for Operation “Storm” (1995), the exodus of more than 200 thousand Serbs from Croatia, the integration of Croatia into NATO and the European Union. Despite the negative burden of historical memory, both Zagreb and Belgrade in bilateral relations are increasingly guided by political pragmatism and balanced assessments of the qualitatively changed situation. Against this background, the Dayton model of state structure in Bosnia and Herzegovina, built on the basis of institutional transactions of actors representing competing ethnocultural communities, demonstrates its dysfunctionality. The interaction and cooperation of these actors remain largely limited, carried out under external control and pressure. Regarding the structure of the article, the author, fi rst, discusses some general issues contributing to the enduring confl ict in the Western Balkans; second, the article examines the prospects of antagonism between the Serbs and Croats; third, I analyze the impact of the Dayton Accords on the post-Yugoslav space. I conclude that scenarios for the future of the Western Balkans, to which the European Union and the United States are oriented, do not lead to the elimination of the causes of major confl icts in the post-Yugoslav space and obviously diverge in essential points from the images of the desired future that correspond to the aspirations of a signifi cant part of the population in the region.
Keywords
About the Author
D. V. YefremenkoRussian Federation
Dmitry V. Yefremenko, Doctor of Political Science, Deputy Director
Moscow, Nakhimovsky prospect, 51/21, 117418
Competing Interests:
No potential confl ict of interests was reported by the author
References
1. Il’yn, Mikhail V., Elena Yu. Meleshkina, and Andrey Yu. Mel’vil’. “Formation of New States: External and Internal Factors of Consolidation.” [Formirovanie novykh gosudarstv: vneshnie i vnutrennie faktory konsolidatsii] Polis, no. 3 (2010): 26–39 [In Russian].
2. Kosovo: Past, Present, Future [Kosovo: proshloe, nastoyashee, buduschee], edited by S.A. Romanenko, B.A. Schmelev. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteia, 2012 [In Russian].
3. Kudryashova, Irina V., and Elena Yu. Meleshkina. “Power Sharing and Formation a National Community: Refl ecting the Bosnian Experience.” [Razdelenie vlasti i formirovanie natsionalnogo soobschestva: osmyslenie bosnijskogo opyta] Aktualnye problemy Evropy, no. 2 (2021): 54–76 [In Russian].
4. Nikiforov, Konstantin V. “Geopolitical Aspect of Yugoslavian Crisis” [Geopoliticheskij aspekt jugoslavskogo krizisa]. In Yugoslavia in 20th Century: Essays on Political History, 865–870. Moscow: Indrik, 2011 [In Russian].
5. Ponomareva, Elena G. “Albanian Factor of Destabilization of the Western Balkans” [Albanskij faktor destabilizatsii Zapadnykh Balkan] Vestnik MGIMO- Universiteta, no. 2 (2018): 99–124.
6. Archibugi, Daniele, and Alice Pease. Crime and Global Justice: The Dynamics of International Punishment. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018.
7. Bartolini, Stefano. Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
8. Berglund, Sten, ed. The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013.
9. Bellamy, Alex J. The Formation of Croatian National Identity. A Centuries-Old Dream? Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013
10. Bildt, Carl. Peace Journey: The Struggle for Peace in Bosnia. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998.
11. Bojicic-Dzelilovic, Vesna. “The Politics, Practice and Paradox of ‘Ethnic Security’ in Bosnia-Herzegovina.” Stability: International Journal of Security and Development 4, no. 1 (2015): 1–18.
12. Bunce, Valerie. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Collapse of Socialism and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
13. Crawford, Beverly. “Explaining Defection from International Cooperation: Germany’s Unilateral Recognition of Croatia.” World Politics 48, no. 4 (July 1996): 482–521.
14. Endresen, Cecilie. “Status Report Albania 100 Years: Symbolic Nation-Building Completed?” In Strategies of Symbolic Nation-Building in South Eastern Europe, edited by P. Kolstø, 201–226. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 2014.
15. Goldsworthy, Vesna. Inventing Ruritania. The Imperialism of the Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
16. Guzina, Dejan. “The Self-Destruction of Yugoslavia.” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism 27, no. 1/2 (2000): 21–32.
17. Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970.
18. Hoare, Marco A. “The War of Yugoslav Succession.” In Central and Southeast European Politics since 1989, edited by S. Ramet, 111–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
19. Kanin, David. “Partition, Frustration, and Identity in the Former Yugoslavia.” Journal of Modern Hellenism 30, (2014): 110–140.
20. Kaplan, Robert D. Balkan Ghosts: A Journey through History. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993.
21. Kritz, Neil, ed. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Vols. I–III. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace Press, 1995.
22. Lijphart, Arend. Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, 2007.
23. Montanaro, Lucia. The Kosovo Statebuilding Conundrum: Addressing Fragility in a Contested State. FRIDE working paper no. 91. Madrid: Fundació n para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diá logo Exterior (FRIDE), 2009. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/131017/WP91_Lucia_Montanaro_Kosovo_Statebuilding_Conundrum_3dic.pdf.
24. Ramet, Sabrina P. Balkan Babel: The Disintegration of Yugoslavia from the Death of Tito to the Fall of Miloš ević . 4th ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2002.
25. Stokes, Gale, John Lampe, Dennison Rusinow, and Julie Mostov. “Instant History: Understanding the Wars of Yugoslav Succession.” Slavic Review 55, no. 1 (Spring 1996): 136–160.
26. Tarifa, Fatos. Vengeance is Mine: Justice Albanian Style. Chapel Hill, NC: Globic Press, 2008.
27. Todorova, Maria. Imagining the Balkans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
28. Weller, Marc. Negotiating the Final Status of Kosovo. Chaillot Paper No. 114. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies, 2008. https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/negotiating-final-status-kosovo.
29. Ypi, Lea L. “The Albanian Renaissance in Political Thought: Between the Enlightenment and Romanticism.” East European Politics and Societies 21, no. 4 (2007): 661–680.
30. Zimmermann, Warren. Origins of a Catastrophe: Yugoslavia and Its Destroyers. America’s Last Ambassador Tells What Happened and Why. New York: Times Books, 1999.
Review
For citations:
Yefremenko D.V. The Open End of the War of Yugoslav Legacy: the Consequences of the Dissolution of the SFRY Three Decades Later. Journal of International Analytics. 2021;12(1):74-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-1-74-95