Historical Institutionalism and the European Union’s post-Cold War Foreign Policy Development
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-3-72-86
Abstract
This paper maintains that Historical Institutionalism – with its emphasis on such concepts as path dependency, time, continuity and change, critical junctures, and unintended consequences – serves as a valuable theoretical tool in explaining the why and how of the European Union developing from a strictly economic union during the first forty years of its existence towards a political union with a global foreign policy agenda in the post-Cold War period. Discussing the EU’s post-1989 foreign policy development and zooming in on the EU’s policy towards Eastern Europe to illustrate its argument, the paper argues that Brussels’ participation in global politics has for long been in the making. More specifically, four elements that have determined – and continue to do so – the EU’s foreign policy portfolio are first, the successful economic integration in the first forty years of the European Union’s existence; second, the logic of integration through institutionalization driving EU integration since 1952; third, the – at first – informal European Political Cooperation witnessing the emergence of tacit norms and rules of conducting foreign policy coordination; and fourth, the rhetoric commitment to the region of Central and Eastern Europe pre-1989.
About the Author
М. Neuman
University of Groningen
Netherlands
Competing Interests:
Netherlands
Marek Neuman, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts, Department of International Relations and International Organization
PO Box 716, 9700 AS, Groningen
Competing Interests:
No potential confl ict of interest was reported by the author
References
1. Averre, Derek. “Competing Rationalities: Russia, the EU and the ‘Shared Neighbourhood’.” Europe-Asia Studies 61, no. 10 (2009): 1689-1713.
2. Bassompierre, Guy de. Changing the Guard in Brussels. New York: Praeger, 1988.
3. Bechev, Dimitar. “Understanding the Contest between the EU and Russia in their Shared Neighborhood.” Problems of Post-Communism 62, no. 6 (2015) :340-349. https://doi.org.10.1080*10758216.2015.1067751
4. Capoccia, Giovanni, and R. Daniel Kelemen. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59, no. 3: 341-369.
5. Cadier, David. “Eastern Partnership vs Eurasian Union? The EU-Russia Competition in the Shared Neighbourhood and the Ukraine Crisis.” Global Policy 5, no. s1 (2014): 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1111.1758-5899.12152
6. Casier, Tom. “The Unintended Consequences of a European Neighbourhood Policy without Russia.” The International Spectator 54, no. 1 (2019): 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1080.03932729.2019.1555224
7. Chebankova, Elena. “Russia’s Idea of the Multipolar World Order: Origins and Main Dimensions.” Post-Soviet Affairs 33, no. 3 (2017): 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1080.1060586X.2017.1293394
8. Chin, Gregory. “The Emerging Countries and China in the G20: Reshaping Global Economic Governance.” Studia Diplomatica 63, no. 2 (2010): 105-123.
9. Christiansen, Thomas, and Amy Verdun. “Historical Institutionalism in the Study of European Integration.” In Oxford Encyclopedia of European Union Politics, edited by Finn Laurse., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
10. Comelli, Michele. “The Challenges of the European Neighbourhood Policy.” The International Spectator 39, no. 3 (2004): 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932720408457087.
11. Cooper, Andrew F. and Daniel Flemes. “Foreign Policy Strategies of Emerging Powers in a Multipolar World: An Introductory Review.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 6 (2013): 943-962. https://doi.org/10.1080.01436597.2013.802501
12. Cronberg, Tarja. “No EU, no Iran Deal: The EU’s Choice between Multilateralism and the Transatlantic Link.” The Nonproliferation Review 24, no. 3-4: 243-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2018.1432321
13. Dias, Vanda Amaro. “The EU and Russia: Competing Discourses, Practices and Interests in the Shared Neighbourhood.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14, no. 2 (2013): 256-271. https://doi.org/10.1080.15705854.2013.785261
14. Delcour, Laure. “Between the Eastern Partnership and Eurasian Integration: Explaining Post-Soviet Countries’ Engagement in (Competing) Region-Building Projects.” Problems of Post-Communism 62, no. 6 (2015): 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2015.1057075
15. Delcour, Laure. “Dealing with the Elephant in the Room: The EU, Its ‘Eastern Neighbourhood’ and Russia.” Contemporary Politics 24, no. 1 (2018): 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1408169
16. Flemes, Daniel. “India-Brazil-South Africa (IBSA) in the New Global Order: Interest, Strategies and Values of the Emerging Coalition.” International Studies 46, no. 4 (2011): 401-421. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600402
17. Gehring, Thomas, Kevin Urbanski, and Sebastian Oberthür. “The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis.” Journal of Common Market Studies 55, no. 4 (2017): 727-743.
18. Ginsberg, Roy H., and Michael E. Smith. “Understanding the European Union as a Global Political Actor: Theory, Practice, and Impact.” In Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty, edited by Sophie Meunier and Kathleen R. McNamara, 267-281. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
19. Juncos, Ana E. “Resilience as the New EU Foreign Policy Paradigm: A Pragmatist Turn?” European Security 26, no. 1 (2017): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080.09662839.2016.1247809.
20. Kazharski, Aliaksei and Andrey Makarychev. “Suturing the Neighborhood? Russia and the EU in Conflictual Intersubjectivity.” Problems of Post-Communism 62, no. 6 (2015): 328-339. https://doi.org/10.1080.10758216.2015.1057077
21. Keukeleire, Stephan, and Tom Delreux. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
22. Laatikainen, Katie Verlin, and Karen E. Smith (eds). The European Union at the United Nations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006
23. Lukyanov, Fyodor. “Russian Dilemmas in a Multipolar World.” Journal of International Affairs 63, no. 2 (2010): 19-32.
24. Pänke, Julian. “Liberal Empire, Geopolitics and EU Strategy: Norms and Interests in European Foreign Policy Making.” Geopolitics 24, no. 1: 100-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1528545
25. Pollack, Mark A. “Rational Choice and Historical Institutionalism.” In European Integration Theory, edited by Antje Wiener, Tanja A. Börzel, and Thomas Risse, 108-127. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
26. Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, 1-37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
27. Makarychev, Andrey. Russia and the EU in a Multipolar World: Discourses, Identities, Norms. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag, 2014
28. Meunier, Sophie and Kathleen R. McNamara (eds). Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
29. Missiroli, Antonio. “The ENP in Future Perspective.” In The European Neighbourhood Policy in Perspective: Context, Implementation and Impact, edited by Richard G. Whitman and Stefan Wolff, 259-270. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
30. Neuman, Marek. Too Small to Make an Impact? The Czech Republic’s Influence on the European Union’s Foreign Policy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2015.
31. Noutcheva, Gergana. “Whose Legitimacy? The EU and Russia in Contest for the Eastern Neighbourhood.” Democratization 25, no. 2 (2018): 312-330. https://doi.org/10.1080.13510347.2017.1363186
32. Pierson, Paul. “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutional Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 29, no. 2 (1996): 123-163.
33. Rittberger, Berthold. “Which Institutions for Post-War Europe? Explaining the Institutional Design of Europe’s First Community.” Journal of European Public Policy 8, no. 5: 673-708. https://doi.org/10.1080.13501760110083464.
34. Rosamond, Ben. “The Uniting of Europe and the Foundation of EU Studies: Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas.” Journal of European Pubic Policy 12, no. 2: 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1080.13501760500043928.
35. Sasse, Gwendolyn. “The European Neighbourhood Policy: Conditionality Revisited for the EU’s Eastern Neighbours.” Europe-Asia Studies 60, no. 2 (2008): 295-316. https://doi.org//10.1080.09668130701820150.
36. Sasse, Gwendolyn. “The European Neighbourhood Policy and Conflict Management: A Comparison of Moldova and the Caucasus.” Ethnopolitics 8, no. 3-4 (2009): 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080.17449050903086971.
37. Saurugger, Sabine. “Sociological Institutionalism and European Integration.” In Oxford Encyclopedia of European Union Politics, edited by Finn Laursen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
38. Schmidt, Vivien A. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11, no. 11 (2008): 303-326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
39. Schneider, Gerald, and Anastasia Ershova. „Rational Choice Institutionalism and European Integration.“ In Oxford Encyclopedia of European Union Politics, edited by Finn Laursen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
40. Smith, Martin A. “Russia and Multipolarity since the End of the Cold War.” East European Politics 29, no. 1 (2013): 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.764481
41. Smith, Karen E. “The Outsiders: The European Neighbourhood Policy.” International Affairs 81, no. 4 (2005): 757-773.
42. Smith, Michael E. “Diplomacy by Decree: The Legalization of EU Foreign Policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 39, no. 1 (2001): 79-104.
43. Tocci, Nathalie. “Firm in Rhetoric, Compromising in Reality: The EU in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.” Ethnopolitics 8, no. 3-4 (2009): 387-401. https://doi.org/10.1080.17449050903086989.
44. Tocci, Nathalie. “Resilience and the role of the European Union in the World.” Contemporary Security Studies 41, no. 2 (2020): 176-794. https://doi.org.10.1080.13523560.2019.1640342.
45. Tonra, Ben, and Thomas Christiansen (eds). Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004.
46. Trenin, Dmitri. “Russia’s Spheres of Interest, not Influence.” The Washington Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2009): 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1080.01636600903231089
47. Vachudova, Milada Anna. “Historical Institutionalism and the EU’s Eastward Enlargement.” In Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty, edited by Sophie Meunier and Kathleen R. McNamara, 105-120. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
48. Verdun, Amy. “A Historical Institutionalist Explanation of the EU’s Response to the Euro Area Financial Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 22, no. 2 (2015): 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1080.13501763.2014.994023.
49. Wallace, William. “European Foreign Policy since the Cold War: How Ambitious, How Inhibited?” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19, no. 1 (2017): 77-90.
Review
For citations:
Neuman М. Historical Institutionalism and the European Union’s post-Cold War Foreign Policy Development. Journal of International Analytics. 2021;12(3):72-86. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-3-72-86
Views:
1068
Email this article 