Finlandization, Neutrality, or Kekkoslovakia? Paasikivi–Kekkonen’s Line in Finnish Discourses 30 Years after the End of the Cold War

Although the Cold War ended thirty years ago, the Paasikivi–Kekkonen’s line, which characterized Finland’s foreign and domestic politics in the Cold War era, remains an essential element of various competing discourses in the country. This article is based on a study of the “Paasikivi–Kekkonen’s line” concept as a fl oating signifi er frequently used in competing Finnish discourses, including those on the Finnish–Russian relations, on the Finnish foreign policy strategy, and on Finnish domestic politics. The discourse on the relations with Russia involves the proponents of continuing with the Paasikivi–Kekkonen’s line aiming at transforming Russia’s geographical proximity into an opportunity for Finland, and those who oppose this line on the grounds that in the Cold War era it resulted in a shameful “Finlandization” of the country. The Finnish discourse on the country’s foreign policy strategy involves those who argue in favor of continuing with the Paasikivi–Kekkonen’s line, of which the core was neutrality in the Cold War era and is non-alignment today, and those in favor of giving up with non-alignment to choose the NATO option. The article discovers that Sweden plays a critical role in this discourse than Russia. Finally, the Finnish discourse on the country’s domestic politics involves those in favor of continuing with the Paasikivi–Kekkonen’s line, of which the core is consensual politics, and those who support the transition to more transparent, albeit inevitably partisan politics.

1. Antjushina, Natalia M. “Stoletie Finlyandskoy Respubliki.” Sovremennaya Evropa no. 5 (2017): 35–42 [In Russian].

2. Vezhlivtseva, Natalia. “Modern Interpretation of ‘Finlandization’.” Contemporary Europe 97, no. 4 (August 1, 2020): 83–90.

3. Voronov, K. “Nordic neutralism in the XXI century: Historical Finale or a New Transformation?” Contemporary Europe 18, no. 1 (2018):80–89 [In Russian].

4. Kilin, Y. “Neutral States at the Crossroad: the Issue of Sweden and Finland’s Membership in NATO.” Contemporary Europe 74, no. 2 (2017): 65–76 [In Russian].

5. Novikova, I. N. “Russia and the Participation of the Grand Duchy of Finland in the Olympic Movement at the Beginning of the 20th Century.” Modern History of Russia 8, no. 1 (2018): 142–164 [In Russian].

6. Plevako, Natalia. “Critical Years in Soviet-Finnish Relations (About Kimmo Rentola’s Book ‘Stalin and the Fate of Finland’).” Contemporary Europe 1, no. 94 (January 1, 2020): 202–12 [In Russian].

7. Khudoley, K. K., and Lanko, D. A. “Finnish Security Dilemma, NATO and the Factor of Eastern Europe.” World Economy and International Relations 63, no. 3 (2019): 13–20 [In Russian].

8. Arter, David. “Kekkonen’s Finland: Enlightened Despotism or Consensual Democracy?” West European Politics 4, no. 3 (October 3, 1981): 219–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402388108424333.

9. Brownung, Christopher S. “Coming Home or Moving Home?” Cooperation and Confl ict 37, no. 1 (March 29, 2002): 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836702037001691.

10. Cafaro, Joseph J. Soviet-Finnish Relations, 1944–1982: A Study of Strategic Interests and Showcase Diplomacy. Tallahassee: Florida State University, 1984.

11. Gilley, Bruce. “Not So Dire Straits: How the Finlandization of Taiwan Benefi ts U.S. Security.” Foreign Aff airs 89, no. 1 (2010): 44–60.

12. Halmesvirta, Anssi. “A Foreign Benefactor and a Domestic Liberator: The Cults of Lenin and Mannerheim in Finland.” Scandinavian Journal of History 34, no. 4 (December 17, 2009): 414–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468750903151628.

13. Hatavara, Mari, and Kari Teräs. “Me, Kekkonen And Political Decline: The Historical Image And Narrative Devices Constructed By Veikko Vennamo In Memoirs.” Historiallinen aikakauskirja 114, no. 1 (2016): 74–88 [In Finnish].

14. Hoff erberth, Matthias. “Mapping the Meanings of Global Governance: A Conceptual Reconstruction of a Floating Signifi er.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43, no. 2 (January 16, 2015): 598–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814561539.

15. Iskanius, Kalevi. “The Nordic Countries in the postWorld War II Cold War Sphere of Infl uence.” Tiede Ja Ase 32 (1974): 33–76 [In Finnish].

16. Jussila, Osmo, Seppo Hentilä, and Jukka Nevakivi. 1995. Political History of Finland, 1809–1995. Helsinki, Juva: WSOY [In Finnish].

17. Juntunen, Tapio. “Helsinki Syndrome: The Parachronistic Renaissance of Finlandization in International Politics.” New Perspectives 25, no. 1 (February 27, 2017): 55–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X1702500103.

18. Kivimaki, T. “Finlandization and the Peaceful Development of China.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 8, no. 2 (June 1, 2015): 139–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pov003.

19. Kivimäki, Ville. “Between Defeat and Victory: Finnish Memory Culture of the Second World War.” Scandinavian Journal of History 37, no. 4 (September 2012): 482–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2012.680178.

20. Laclau, Ernesto. New Refl ections on the Revolution of Our Times, translated by Jon Barnes. London: Verso, 1990.

21. Laqueur, Walter. The Political Psychology of Appeasement: Finlandization and Other Unpopular Essays. New York: Routledge, 1980.

22. Lavery, Jason. “All of the President’s Historians: The Debate over Urho Kekkonen.” Scandinavian Studies 75, no. 3 (2003): 375–98.

23. Linna, Lauri. Vennamo’s Hostages. Ylivieska: KL-paino, 1998 [In Finnish].

24. Lounasmeri, Lotta, and Jukka Kortti. “Campaigning between East and West: Finland and the Cold War in the Presidential Campaign Films of Urho Kekkonen.” Cold War History 20, no. 3 (July 2, 2020): 329–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2018.1532996.

25. Maude, George. “The Further Shores of Finlandization.” Cooperation and Confl ict 17, no. 1 (March 29, 1982): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/001083678201700102.

26. McDonald, Scott B. “The Future of (US) Foreign Aid in the Caribbean after Grenada: Finlandization and Confrontation in the Eastern Tier.” Inter-American Economic Aff airs 38, no. 4 (1985): 59–74.

27. Paasi, Anssi. “The Rise and Fall of Finnish Geopolitics.” Political Geography Quarterly 9, no. 1 (January 1990): 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-9827(90)90006-V.

28. Pi Ferrer, Laia, and Pertti Alasuutari. “The Spread and Domestication of the Term ‘Austerity:’ Evidence from the Portuguese and Spanish Parliaments.” Politics & Policy 47, no. 6 (December 18, 2019): 1039–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12331.

29. Quester, George H. “Finlandization as a Problem or an Opportunity?” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 512 (1990): 33–45.

30. Rainio-Niemi, Johanna. The Ideological Cold War: The Politics of Neutrality in Austria and Finland. London: Routledge, 2014.

31. Ridanpää, Juha. “Culturological Analysis of Filmic Border Crossings: Popular Geopolitics of Accessing the Soviet Union from Finland.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 32, no. 2 (April 3, 2017): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1195699.

32. Tarkka, Jukka, and Allan Tiitta. Itsenäinen Suomi: seitsemän vuosikymmentä kansakunnan elämästä. Helsinki: Otava, 1987. Tarkka, Jukka, and Allan Tiitta. Independent Finland: Seven Decades in the Life of the Nation. Helsinki: Otava, 1987 [In Finnish].

33. Uutela, Marjo. “‘The End of Finlandization’. Finland’s Foreign Policy in the Eyes of the Two German States 1985–1990.” The International History Review 42, no. 2 (March 3, 2020): 410–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2019.1577286.

34. Vennamo, Veikko. Behind the Scenes. The Time of Mannerheim, Paasikivi, Kekkonen and Koivisto. Helsinki: Gummerus, 1987 [In Finnish].

35. Warszawski, Michał. “Pulp Friction: Cellulose War or Finlandization.” Przeglad Papierniczy 63, no. 9 (2007): 562–564 [In Polish]