Preview

Journal of International Analytics

Advanced search

The Challenge of Taliban Ideology for International Politics: Religious Competition, Counterterrorism, and the Search for Legitimacy

https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-4-50-67

Abstract

This paper examines the Taliban vision of an Islamic polity posing a challenge to neighboring Central and South Asian states as well as more distant ones in Eurasia and the Middle East. As a potential magnet for militants across these regions, Taliban Islam represents an alternative to forms of piety and legal practice in states that have signifi cant Muslim populations and where each government claims some degree of religious legitimation and control over Islamic authority and interpretation. Author claims the Taliban ideology poses a dilemma to regional actors, too, in that it makes all parties who might cooperate with the movement vulnerable to criticism based on human rights discourse. At the same time, the presence of the Islamic State – Khorasan Province (ISKP) has permitted the movement the opportunity to seek to reframe its international standing and its relationship to violence. The Taliban have adapted their critique of ISKP to the claim that they share a counterterrorism mission with other governments, an assertion that allows the movement and its partners to defl ect criticism from various quarters and normalize relations with other states. Author concludes that, seeking international support, the Taliban have adapted their ideological claims to position the movement simultaneously as a competitor to other visions of militant jihadist politics and as a counterterrorist force laying the groundwork for the legitimation of their place in a rapidly evolving global order.

About the Author

R. D. Crews
Stanford University
United States

Robert D. Crews, Professor at Stanford University, Department of History

CA 94305-2024, Stanford, California



References

1. Yarlykapov, A. “'Islamic State' and the North Caucasus in the Middle East Perspective: Challenges to and Lessons for Russia.” Journal of International Analytics 3 (2016):112–121 [In Russian].

2. Caron, James. “Taliban, Real and Imagined.” In Under the Drones: Modern Lives in the Afghanistan-Pakistan Borderlands, edited by Shahzad Bashir and Robert D. Crews, 58–82. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.

3. Crews, Robert D., “The Taliban and Nationalist Militancy in Afghanistan.” In Contextualizing Jihadi Thought, edited by Jeevan Deol and Zaheer Kazmi, 343–368. London and NY: Hurst and Company, 2012.

4. Crews, Robert D. and Amin Tarzi, eds. The Taliban and the Crisis of Afghanistan. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2008.

5. Giustozzi, Antonio. The Islamic State in Khorasan: Afghanistan, Pakistan and the New Central Asian Jihad. London: Hurst and Company, 2018.

6. Giustozzi, Antonio. The Taliban at War 2001-2018. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

7. Green, Nile. Terrains of Exchange: Religious Economies of Global Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

8. Harpviken, Kristian Berg, and Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh. A Rock Between Hard Places: Afghanistan as an Arena of Regional Insecurity. London: Hurst and Company, 2016.

9. Hartung, Jan-Peter. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Ṭālibān, Afghan Self-Determination, and the Challenges of Transnational Jihadism.” Die Welt des Islams 56, no. 2 (August 18, 2016): 125–152. https://doi. org/10.1163/15700607-00562p01.

10. Hoffman, Jonathan. “Moscow, Beijing, and the Crescent: Russian and Chinese Religious Soft Power in the Middle East.” Digest of Middle East Studies 30 (2021): 76–86. https://doi. org/10.1111/dome.12232.

11. Ibrahimi, Niamatullah. The Hazaras and the Afghan State: Rebellion, Exclusion and the Struggle for Recognition. London: Hurst and Company, 2017.

12. Kazmi, Zaheer. “Radical Islam in the Western Academy.” Review of International Studies (2021): 1–23. https://doi:10.1017/S0260210521000553.

13. Laruelle, Marlene, ed. “Russia’s Islamic Diplomacy,” Central Asia Program Paper. no. 220, June 2019.

14. Mitchell, Timothy. “McJihad: Islam in the U.S. Global Order.” Social Text 20, no.4 (2002): 1–18.

15. Nader, Alireza, Ali G. Scotten, Ahmad Idrees Rahmani, Robert Stewart, and Leila Mahnad. “Iran and Afghanistan: A Complicated Relationship.” In Iran’s Infl uence in Afghanistan: Implications for the U.S. Drawdown, 5–22. RAND Corporation, 2014.

16. Nasr, Vali. The Shia Revival: How Confl icts within Islam Will Shape the Future. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006.

17. Rashid, Ahmed. Taliban. Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2000.

18. Roberts, Sean R. The War on the Uyghurs: China’s Campaign against Xinjiang’s Muslims. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.

19. Ruttig, Thomas. “How Tribal Are the Taliban?” In Under the Drones: Modern Lives in the Afghanistan Pakistan Borderlands, edited by Shahzad Bashir and Robert D. Crews, 102–135. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.

20. Schetter, Conrad, and Jörgen Klussmann, eds. Der Taliban-Komplex: Zwischen Aufstands bewe gung und Militärreinsatz. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2011.

21. Schetter, Conrad and Jörgen Klussmann, eds. The Taliban Complex: Between Insurgency and Military Purpose. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag, 2011 [In German].

22. Snyder, Jack, ed. Religion and International Relations Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.

23. Stepanova, Ekaterina. “Russia and the Search for a Negotiated Solution in Afghanistan.” Europe-Asia Studies 73, no.5 (October 26, 2021): 928–952. https://doi: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1826908.

24. Strick Van-Linschoten, Alex and Felix Kuehn, eds. The Taliban Reader: War, Islam and Politics. Oxford and NY: Oxford University Press, 2018.

25. Tarzi, Amin. “Islamic State–Khurasan Province.” In The Future of ISIS: Regional and International Implications, edited by Feisal al-Istrabadi, and Sumit Ganguly, 119–148. Brookings Institution Press, 2018.


Review

For citations:


Crews R.D. The Challenge of Taliban Ideology for International Politics: Religious Competition, Counterterrorism, and the Search for Legitimacy. Journal of International Analytics. 2021;12(4):50-67. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-4-50-67

Views: 1312


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-8476 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9633 (Online)