Multifaceted Islam: Malaysia
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-4-68-87
Abstract
This paper analyzes the Islam’s impact on the Malaysian politics. Islam as an instrument of Malaysia’s foreign policy has been used by the political elite of the state for decades. Observers note the Islamization of the country’s foreign policy, especially during the premiership of Najib Razak (2008– 2018). However, the trend towards Islamization can be traced back to the moment Malaysia gained independence from Great Britain in 1957 and especially during the premiership of Mahathir Mohamad (1981–2003). The formation of such a foreign policy of Malaysia took place against the background of the Islamization of the political and social environment within the country, which, in turn, was the result of an internal political struggle. Thus, the projection of Malaysia’s identity into the outside world and the foreign policy corresponding to this identity was often motivated by the need to retain or attract the support of the malay-muslim majority in the domestic political arena. Since many of the issues raised in the article relate to identity both at the national and global level, a constructivist paradigm is used to conceptualize Malaysia’s foreign policy with a special emphasis on the identity of states. Particularly important in this process is the formation of domestic and foreign policy discourse. Malaysia’s Islamic identity is viewed externally in three dimensions: the Sunni state, the activist state in the Islamic world and the standard of moderate Islam. Consideration of these dimensions reveals quite obvious contradictions between them, as well as between rhetoric and real politics.
About the Author
Ju. V. RoknifardMalaysia
Julia V. Roknifard, PhD, Assistant Professor at the School of Politics, History and International Relations (PHIR)
Malaysia, 43500, Semenyih Selangor Darul Ehsan, Jalan Broga
References
1. Asmolov, Konstantin V., and Alexander V. Soloviev. “Strategic Autonomy for ROK: Intellectual Pipe Dream or Political Reality?” Journal of International Analytics 12, no. 2 (2021): 49–73. [In Russian].
2. Ashizawa, Kuniko. “When Identity Matters: State Identity, Regional Institution-Building, and Japanese Foreign Policy.” International Studies Review 10, no. 3 (September 2008): 571–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-2486.2008.00805.x.
3. Botero, Giovanni. The Reason of State. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.
4. Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller. The Foucault Eff ect. Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1991.
5. Burton, Guy. “Middle Power Behavior Under Multipolarity: Indonesia and Malaysia in the Middle East since the Arab Uprisings.” Asian Politics and Policy, no. 13 (2021): 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12577.
6. Chin, James. “From Ketuanan Melayu to Ketuanan Islam: UMNO and the Malaysian Chinese.” In The End of UMNO? Essays on Malaysia’s Dominant Party, edited by Bridget Welsh, 255–304. Petailing Jaya: SIRD, 2018.
7. Chin, James. “Malaysia: Identity Politics, the Rise of Political Islam and Ketuanan Melayu Islam.” In Religion & Identity Politics: Global Trends and Local Realities, edited by M. Mathews, and M. Tay, 75–95. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies, 2021.
8. Hirschman, Charles. “Demographic Trends in Peninsular Malaysia, 1947-75.” Population and Development Review 6, no. 1 (March 1980): 103–125. https://faculty. washington.edu/charles/new%20PUBS/A26.pdf.
9. Jordaan, Eduard. “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers.” Politikon 30, no. 1 (May 30, 2003): 165–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02 58934032000147282.
10. Kushimoto, Hiroko. “‘Azharisation’ of ‘Ulama Training in Malaysia.” In Shaping Global Islamic Discourses, edited by Masooda Bano, and Keiko Sakurai. Edinburgh University Press, 2015. https://doi. org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748696857.003.0009.
11. Malik, Maszlee. “Salafi sm in Malaysia: Historical Account on Its Emergence and Motivations.” Sociology of Islam 5, no. 4 (December 5, 2017): 303–33. https://doi. org/10.1163/22131418-00504003.
12. Norshahril Saat, Nur Syafi qah Mohd Taufek, and Afra Alatas. Rethinking Extremism Beyond Physical Violence: Anti-Shia Hostility in Malaysia. Perspective by ISEAS, no. 81 (16 June 2021): 1–10, https://www. iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ISEAS_ Perspective_2021_81.pdf.
13. Waikar, Prashant, Mohamed Nawab Mohamed Osman, and Rashaad Ali. “Dancing with the Ummah: Islam in Malaysia’s Foreign Policy under Najib Razak.” The Pacifi c Review, no. 2 (2019): 230–58. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09512748.2019.1656666.
Review
For citations:
Roknifard J.V. Multifaceted Islam: Malaysia. Journal of International Analytics. 2021;12(4):68-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-4-68-87