Preview

Journal of International Analytics

Advanced search

“Poscolonial Moment” in Foreign Policy Discourse: the Casus of “Global Britain”

https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-2-116-132

Abstract

The article explores interrelation between the postcolonial discourse and modern British foreign policy, designated as a “postcolonial moment” in the strategic thinking of the political establishment. It is noted that the withdrawal from the EU has again attracted public and academic attention to the imperial past, which is sometimes regarded not only as a possible reason for Brexit, but also as a starting point for design of the country’s foreign policy under the new conditions (the idea of “Global Britain”). The post-imperial discourse in the modern British political environment is analyzed within several aspects: how it affects the strategic reasoning of the elite circles, specific trends in dealing with the former colonies, and postcolonialism components in the new foreign strategy (case of “Indo-Pacific tilt”). Proceeding from the paradigm of postcolonial constructivism, the article shows that the issues of imperial heritage still remain an important aspect in British foreign policy identity, but in the context of strategic planning it takes on new meanings. Firstly, the political establishment continues to search for a new international role and appeals to the former colonies as a resource of their foreign policy (whether it is economy, strategy, or image). Secondly, distancing themselves from the rhetoric of the colonial past, they refer to “common history” and identity as the world politics see the formation of a polycentric system. This trend is reflected in the challenge of building new long-term alliances through “patient diplomacy.” The “Global Britain” discourse, due to its direct connotation with the postcolonial past, becomes undesirable for both the ruling political elite and the opposition.

About the Author

K. A. Godovanyuk
Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Kira A. Godovanyuk, PhD (Polit. Sci.), Leading Research Fellow Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences; Senior Research Fellow, Institute MGIMO University

11-3, Mokhovaya street, Moscow, 125009

76, Vernadsky avenue, Moscow, Russia, 119454


Competing Interests:

No potential confl ict of interest was reported by the author.



References

1. Godovanyuk, Kira “‘Global Britain’ as an Outcome of Historical Disputes over UK Identity.” Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 6 (2020):181–190 [In Russian]. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope62020181190.

2. Kapitonova, Natalia. “In Search of a New Role: Neo-Imperial and Global Britain Tory Projects in the Light of Brexit.” Vestnik RFFI, no. 105 (2020): 24–27 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.22204/2410-4639-2020-105-01-24-27

3. Adem, Seifudein. Postcolonial Constructivism. Mazrui’s Theory of Intercultural Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60581-0.

4. Adi, Hakim. “To What Extent is Britain Post-Colonial?” E-International Relations, (October 3, 2012). https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/27844.

5. Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. “The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies.” Review of International Studies 32, no. 2 (2006): 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506007054.

6. Beaumont, Paul. “Brexit, Retrotopia and the Perils of Post-Colonial Delusions.” Global Affairs 3, no. 4–5 (2017): 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2018.1478674.

7. Davies, Jude. “Black Lives Matter in London, June 2020: Patrick Hutchinson, Instant Celebrity, and Changing Discourses of Race and Class in British Media.” Celebrity Studies 13, 2 (2022): 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392397.2022.2063973.

8. Dorling, Danny, and Sally Tomlinson. Rule Britannia: Brexit and the End of Empire. London: Biteback Publishing, 2019.

9. Ferguson, Niall. Empire: the Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power. London: Basic Books, 2002.

10. Fitzgerald, Susannah. “Do Postcolonial Approaches Explain World Politics Better than Other IR Theories?” E-International Relations, (June 26, 2019). https://www.eir.info/2019/06/26/do-postcolonial-approaches-explainworld-politics-better-than-other-ir-theories/.

11. Frost, Alec Llywelyn. “Examining the Validity of a ‘Global Britain’ and Its Ties with the Commonwealth.” E-International Relations, (July 29, 2019). https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/79547.

12. Gandhi, Leela. Postcolonial Theory: a Critical Introduction: Second Edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2019.

13. Gilroy, Paul. After Empire: Melancholia or Convivial Culture. London: Routledge, 2004.

14. Go, Julian. Postcolonial Thought and Social Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190625139.001.0001.

15. Kenny, Michael, and Nick Pearce. Shadows of Empire. The Anglosphere in British Politics. Cambridge: Polity, 2018.

16. Kwarteng, Kwasi. Ghosts of Empire: Britain’s Legacies in the Modern World. London: Bloomsbury, 2012.

17. Patalano, Alessio. Days of Future Past? British Strategy and the Shaping of Indo-Pacific Security. London: Policy Exchange, 2019. https://policyexchange.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/Days-of-Future-Past.pdf.

18. Saunders, Robert. “Brexit and Empire: ‘Global Britain’ and the Myth of Imperial Nostalgia.” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 48, no. 6 (2020):1140–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086534.2020.1848403.

19. Turner, Oliver. “Global Britain and the Narrative of Empire.” The Political Quarterly 90, no. 4 (2019): 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12739.

20. Vucetic, Srdjan. “Elite – Mass Agreement in British Foreign Policy.” International Affairs 98, no. 1 (2022): 245– 262. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab203.

21. Wallace, William. “Foreign Policy and National Identity in the United Kingdom.” International Affairs 67, no. 1 (1991): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2621219.

22. Loshkariov, Ivan D. “Postcolonialism in International Studies: Two Faces of Theory.” Vestnik RUDN. International Relations 22, no 4 (2022): 659–670 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-4-659-670.

23. Kharitonova, Elena. “Reconsidering the Theme of Empire in the United Kingdom’s Current Political Rhetoric.” Political science, no. 1 (2022): 157– 176 [In Russian]. http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.01.06.


Review

For citations:


Godovanyuk K.A. “Poscolonial Moment” in Foreign Policy Discourse: the Casus of “Global Britain”. Journal of International Analytics. 2023;14(2):116-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-2-116-132

Views: 771


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-8476 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9633 (Online)