Striving for National Identity: Syrian and Iraqi Turkomans in Search of a Homeland

The Turkomans are considered to be the integral part of a political space often reflexively labeled as “Turkic World.” Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the Turkoman communities in Syria and Iraq have undergone a complex evolution leading to their current status as politically organized distinct ethnic groups. This transformation has been predetermined by the policies of the colonial powers and the rise of Arab nationalism that was aimed to establish the united “Arab Homeland.” It was only with the decline of Baathist regimes that Turkomans started to gain political recognition. How have the Turkomans in Syria and Iraq evolved culturally and politically over time? Do they perceive their future as being closely linked to their Arab “host” countries, or do they harbor aspirations of coming back to their historical Turkic legacy? What support do they receive from Turkey, and what is offered by Syrian and Iraqi authorities? We have analyzed the Turkoman issue through a structural and identity-based lens, examining how these communities have navigated their relationships with the Arab states they reside in and their historical ties to Turkey. The framework proposed by R. Brubaker, which examines the interactions between marginalized ethnic minorities, nationalizing states, and external homelands, provides a valuable tool for understanding the complex dynamics involving Turkoman communities in Syria and Iraq. The research findings indicate that Turkoman identity remains robust, albeit with a notable shift towards a more inclusive national-state dimension. Despite constituting a minority group, Turkomans in both countries are actively advocating for recognition within society and asserting their cultural rights. The primary Turkoman political factions in both countries have garnered backing from Turkey, although the nature of this support is complex. In Iraq, Turkomans are inclined towards seeking Turkish patronage while also demonstrating a willingness to engage with the Iraqi government. Conversely, in Syria, Turkomans residing along the border have successfully established a self-governing region with the Turkey’s assistance. Furthermore, a segment of Turkomans place emphasis on their religious affiliations, such as identifying as Shiite or Alawite.

1. Avatkov, Vladimir A., and Alina I. Sbitneva. “New Nationalism of Turkish Republic.” RUDN Journal of Political Science 24, no. 2 (2022): 291–302 [In Russian].

2. Boldyrev, Andrey V. “The Turkish Factor in the Politics of the Great Britain and France in the Interwar period.” Modern and Contemporary History 64, no. 2 (2020): 175–181 [In Russian].

3. Zvyagelskaya, Irina D. “Introduction.” In The Middle East: Politics and Identity, edited by I.D. Zvyagelskaya, 10–18. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2020 [In Russian].

4. Vostok v noveishii period (1945–2000 gg.). T 6. In Istoriya Vostoka. V 6 tomah, edited by V.Ya. Belokrenitskii, V.V. Naumkin. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2008 [In Russian].

5. Kaspe Svyatoslav I. Tsentry i ierarkhii: Prostranstvennye metafory vlasti i zapadnaya politicheskaya forma. Moscow: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanii, 2007 [In Russian].

6. Kireev Nikolai G. Istoriya Turtsii. XX vek. Moscow: IV RAN: Kraft+, 2007 [In Russian].

7. Kozintsev, Alexander S. “A Fight for the State: Syrian Crisis through the Lens of Center-periphery Relations.” Political science (RU), no. 4 (2018): 223–240 [In Russian].

8. Kosach, Grigory G. “Arabskii natsionalizm ili arabskie natsionalizmy: doktrina, ehtnonim, variant diskursa.” In Nationalism in World History, edited by Valery Tishkov, Viktor Shnirelman, 259–331. Moscow: Nauka, 2007 [In Russian].

9. Kudryashova, Irina V. “How to Accomplish Stability in Divided Societies.” Political Science (RU), no. 1 (2016): 15–33 [In Russian].

10. Kudryashova, Irina V., and Alexander S. Kozintsev. “Institutional Solutions for Sectarian Conflicts in the Middle East in the Context of Imperial Legacy.” Political Science (RU), no. 2 (2021): 140–164 [In Russian].

11. Kudryashova, Irina V., and Alexander S. Kozintsev. “Revisiting Cleavage Structures: Islamic Parties and Nation-state Formation in the Arab World.” Polis. Political Studies, no. 3 (2023): 50–69 [In Russian].

12. Meleshkina, Elena S., and Irina V. Kudryashova. “After Empires: Beating Swords into Ploughshares.” Political science (RU), no 1 (2022): 14–51 [In Russian].

13. Naumkin, Vitaliy V. Deeply Divided Societies in the Middle East: Conflict, Violence, and Foreign Intervention. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25: International Relations and World Politics, no. 1 (2015): 66–96 [In Russian].

14. Pir-Budagova, El'za P. Istoriya Sirii. ХХ vek. Moscow: IV RAN, 2015 [In Russian].

15. Podvintsev, Oleg B. “Imperial, Post-Imperial, and Neoimperial Identity.” In Identity: The Individual, Society, and Politics. An Encyclopedia, edited by I.S. Semenenko, 358–362. Moscow: Izdatelstvo VES MIR, 2017 [In Russian].

16. Seyidli, Saleh A. “The Syrian Turkmen Actorness in the Framework of a Post-imperial Nation-state.” Political science (RU), no. 1 (2022): 258–276 [In Russian].

17. Surkov, Nicolay Yu. “Syria: Patriotism as a Remedy for Sectarianism.” In The Middle East: Politics and Identity, edited by I.D. Zvyagelskaya, 171–176. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2020 [In Russian].

18. Kharitonova, Oxana G. “The Theory and Practice of Consociationalism in the Middle-Eastern Context: New Dimensions of an Old Problem.” South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences 22, no. 4 (2021): 61–80 [In Russian].

19. Shlykov, Pavel V. “Eurasianism and Eurasian Integration in the Political Ideologies and Practice of Turkey.” Comparative Politics Russia 8, no. 1 (2017): 58–76 [In Russian].

20. Shchevelev, Sergey S. “The British Mandate and the Uprising of 1920 in Iraq.” Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Historical science 7(73), no. 1 (2021): 140–153 [In Russian].

21. Anderson, Liam D., and Gareth Stansfield. Crisis in Kirkuk: The Ethnopolitics of Conflict and Compromise. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.

22. Barkey, Karen, and George Gavrilis. “The Ottoman Millet System: Non-territorial Autonomy and its Contemporary Legacy.” Ethnopolitics 15, no. 1 (2016): 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1101845.

23. Balanche, Fabrice. Atlas of the Near East, State Formation and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1918–2010. Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2017.

24. Brubaker, Rogers. “National Minorities, Nationalizing States, and External National Homelands in the New Europe.” Daedalus 124, no. 2 (1995): 107–132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027299.

25. Büyüksaraҫ, Güldem B. “Trans-border Minority Activism and Kin-state Politics: The Case of Iraqi Turkmen and Turkish Interventionism.” Anthropological Quarterly 90, no. 1 (2017): 17–53. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2017.

26. Dawisha, Adeed. Arab Nationalism in the Twentieth Century: From Triumph to Despair. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.

27. Dukhan, Haian. “Tribes and Tribalism in the Syrian Uprising.” Tribes & Neighborhoods: The Dynamics of Subtlety 6, no. 2 (2014): 1–27.

28. Fontana, Guiditta. “Creating Nations, Establishing States: Ethno-religious Heterogeneity and the British Creation of Iraq in 1919–1923.” Middle Eastern Studies 46, no. 1 (2010): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200902760535.

29. Hinnebusch, Raymond A. “Syria Under the Ba’th: State Formation in a Fragmented Society.” Arab Studies Quarterly 4, no. 3 (Summer 1982): 177–199.

30. Hinnebusch, Raymond A. “Identity and State Formation in Multi-sectarian Societies: Between Nationalism and Sectarianism in Syria.” Nations and nationalism 26, no. 1 (2020): 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12582

31. Hürmüzlü, Erşat. “The Turkmens of the Middle East.” Turkish Policy Quarterly 14, no. 1 (Spring 2015): 85–93.

32. Jawhar, Raber T. “The Iraqi Turkmen Front.” In Returning to Political Parties? Partisan Logic and Political Transformations in the Arab World, edited by Myriam Catusse, Karam Karam, 313–328. Beyrouth: Presses de l’Ifpo, The Lebanese Center for Policy Studies, 2010.

33. Jӧrum, Emma L. Beyond Syria’s Borders: A History of Territorial Disputes in the Middle East, London, New York: I.B. Tauris, 2014.

34. Karpat, Kemal H. “The Ottoman Ethnic and Confessional Legacy in the Middle East.” In Ethnicity, Pluralism, and the State in the Middle East, edited by Milton J. Esman, Itamar M. Rabinovich, 35–53. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press, 1988.

35. Khadduri, Majid. “The Alexandretta Dispute.” The American Journal of International Law 39, no. 3 (1945): 406–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/2193522.

36. Marcinkowski, Christoph. Shi’ite Identities: Community and Culture in Changing Social Contexts. Münster: LIT Verlag Münster, 2010.

37. Mullen, Christopher A., and J. Atticus Ryan, eds. Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization: Yearbook 1996. Stockholm: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997.

38. Oğuzlu, Tarik H. “Endangered Community: The Turkoman Identity in Iraq.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 24, no. 2 (2004): 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360200042000296681.

39. Osterhammel, Jürgen. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2015.

40. Rath, Saroj K. “Searching a Political Solution for Syria.” India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs 73, no. 2 (2017): 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928416683058.

41. Rubin, Avshalom H. “Abd al-Karim Qasim and the Kurds of Iraq: Centralization, Resistance and Revolt, 1958– 1963.” Middle Eastern Studies 43, no. 3 (2007): 353–382.

42. Saatçi, Suphi. “The Turkman of Iraq.” In Linguistic Minorities in Turkey and Turkic-Speaking Minorities of the Periphery, edited by Christiane Bulut, 329–342. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2018.

43. Sanjian, Avedis K. “The Sanjak of Alexandretta (Hatay): Its Impact on Turkish-Syrian Relations (1939– 1956).” Middle East Journal 10, no. 4 (1956): 379–394.

44. Simons, Geoff L. Iraq: From Sumer to Saddam, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London: Macmillan Publishers, 1996. 2nd edition.

45. Spruyt, Hendrik. The Sovereign State and its Competitors. An Analysis of System Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.

46. Stolleis, Friederike. “Discourses on Minorities and Sectarianism in Syria.” In Playing the Sectarian Card: Identities and Affiliations of Local Communities in Syria, 7–10. Beirut: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2015.

47. Tilly, Charles. “How Empires End.” In After Empire: Multiethnic Societies and Nation-building. The Soviet Union, and the Russian, Ottoman and Habsburg Empires, edited by Karen Barkey, Mark von Hagen, 1–11. Oxford: Westview press, 1997.

48. Tugdar, Emel Elif. “Iraqi Kurdistan’s Statehood Aspirations and Non-Kurdish Actors: The Case of the Turkomans.” In Comparative Kurdish Politics in the Middle East: Actors, Ideas, and Interests, edited by Emel Elif Tugdar, Serhun Al, 3–26. Cham: Springer, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53715-3_1.

49. Yildiz, Tunahan, and Zana Ҫitak. “The Multiple Identities of the Middle East: A Case of Iraqi Turkmen Refugees in Turkey.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 23, no. 2 (2021): 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2020.1867805.