In the Western Orbit: Turkish Approaches to the Study of International Relations
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2024-15-2-92-105
Abstract
The article analyses the current state and development of International Relations research in Turkey, with an emphasis on the possible causes of its periphery status and the growth points for the formation of independent theoretical approaches. The author considers the features of the development of International Relations study and education and the reasons for the lack of attention given to local theories. The analysis uses official statistical data, results of surveys, biographical profiles of leading Turkish researchers in International Relations, and their reflections on the identified problem, as well as Turkish publications in the field of International Relations with theoretical novelty. The author concludes that the prospects for Russian-Turkish relations are determined, among other things, by the ability of the Turkish International Relations school to defend its independence and develop original theoretical approaches, or to begin with, adapt non-Western theories. At present, Turkey in theoretical terms still remains in the Western orbit, but demonstrates a strong political demand to overcome this dependence. The Turkish academic community has not yet overcome the phase of critical rethinking of Western-centrism; it is only preparing to show an interest in non-Western theories of International Relations, and searching for grounds for constructing theories based on their own local environment, history and culture. The underdevelopment of theoretical research in International Relations in Turkey, despite the negative influence of its pro-Western dependence, provides scope for cooperation and positive integration for the Russian and Turkish academic environment. The acquaintance of Turkish researchers with Russian traditions and approaches to International Relations is essential for the successful development of Russian-Turkish relations.
About the Author
V. V. Tsibenko
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Veronika V. Tsibenko, PhD (History), Professor, Department of Oriental Studies, Director of the Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities
140, Pushkinskaya street, Rostov-on-Don, 344006
References
1. Avatkov, Vladimir A., and Andrey S. Vidyaykin. “Think Tanks in Turkey in the Era of JDP.” MGIMO Review of International Relations 30, no. 3 (2013):100–104 [In Russian].
2. Barnashov, Oleg V., Anna G. Gevorgyan, and Funda K. Gekkaya. “Study of International Relations in Turkey”. Vlast’ (The Authority) 27, no. 2 (2019): 268–275 [In Russian].
3. Guzaerov, Razil I. “Stabilizing” Turkey in an Unstable World.” Discourse-P 20, no. 3 (2023): 168–179. [In Russian].
4. Ibragimov, A.G., S.E. Navruzov, and R.M. Tsezdoev. “The Role of Western Theories in the Study of International Relations in Turkey.” The Diplomatic Service, no. 3 (2019) [In Russian].
5. Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, eds. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Washington-London: Taylor & Francis, 2009.
6. Aydın, Mustafa. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Akademisyenlerinin Bilimsel Araştırma ve Uygulamaları ile Disipline Bakış Açıları ve Siyasi Tutumları Anketi.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 4, no. 15 (2007): 1–31.
7. Aydın, Mustafa. “A Questionnaire about Scientific Research and Teaching Practices, Views on the Discipline and Political Attitudes of International Relations’ Academicians in Turkey.” International Relations 4, no. 15 (2007): 1–31 [In Turkish].
8. Aydın, Mustafa, and Korhan Yazgan. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Akademisyenleri Araştırma, Eğitim ve Disiplin Değerlendirmeleri Anketi – 2009.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 7, no. 25 (2010): 3–42.
9. Aydın, Mustafa, and Korhan Yazgan. “Survey of International Relations Faculty in Turkey: Research, Teaching and Views on the Discipline – 2009.” International Relations 7, no. 25 (2010): 3–42 [In Turkish].
10. Aydın, Mustafa, and Korhan Yazgan. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Akademisyenleri Eğitim: Araştırma ve Uluslararası Politika Anketi – 2011.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 9, no. 36 (2013): 3–44.
11. Aydın, Mustafa, and Korhan Yazgan, “Survey International Relations Faculty in Turkey: Teaching, Research and International Politics – 2011”, International Relations 9, no. 36 (2013): 3–44 [In Turkish].
12. Aydın, Mustafa, Fulya Hisarlıoğlu, and Korhan Yazgan. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Akademisyenleri ve Alana Yönelik Yaklaşımları Üzerine Bir İnceleme: TRIP 2014 Sonuçları.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 12, no. 48 (2016): 3–35. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.463044.
13. Aydın, Mustafa, Fulya Hisarlıoğlu, and Yazgan Korhan. “An Analysis of International Relations Academics in Turkey and Their Approaches to the Field: TRIP 2014 Faculty Survey Results”, International Relations 12, no. 48 (2016): 3–35 [In Turkish].
14. Aydın, Mustafa, and Cihan Dizdaroğlu. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler: TRIP 2018 Sonuçları Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 16, no. 64 (2019): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.652877.
15. Aydın, Mustafa, and Cihan Dizdaroğlu. “International Relations in Turkey: An Evaluation on the Findings of TRIP 2018”, International Relations 16, no. 64 (2019): 3–28 [In Turkish].
16. Aydınli, Ersel, and Julie Mathews. “Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia.” Review of International Studies 34, (2008): 693–712. https://doi.org:10.1017/S0260210508008231.
17. Baskıcı, Murat. Mülkiye Tarihi. Mülkiye’den Siyasal’a 160 Yılın Öyküsü. Ankara: Anakara Üniversitesi Basımevi, 2021.
18. Baskıcı, Murat. History of Mülkiye: a 160 Year Story from Mülkiye to Political Science. Ankara: Ankara University Press, 2021 [In Turkish].
19. Bilgin, Pınar. “Uluslararası İlişkiler Çalışmalarında “Merkez-Çevre”: Türkiye Nerede? Uluslararası İlişkiler.” International Relations 2, no. 6 (2005): 3–14.
20. Bilgin, Pınar. “‘Center-periphery’ Relations in the Study of International Relations: Where is Turkey?.” International Relations 2, no. 6 (2005): 3–14 [In Turkish].
21. Bilgin, Pınar, and Oktay F. Tanrısever. “A Telling Story of IR in the Periphery: Telling Turkey About the World, Telling the World About Turkey.” Journal of International Relations and Development 12 (2009): 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2009.5.
22. Crawford, R.M.A., and D.S.L. Jarvis, eds. International Relations – Still an American Social Science: Towards Diversity in International Thought. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 2001.
23. Erhan, Çağri, and Mustafa Aydın. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Eğitiminin Dünü, Bugünü.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 2, no. 6 (2005): 25–29.
24. Erhan, Çağri, and Mustafa Aydın. “The Past and Present of International Relations Education in Turkey.” International Relations 2, no. 6 (2005): 25–29 [In Turkish].
25. Gönlübol, Mehmet et al. Olaylarla Türk Diş Politikasi (1919–1995). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi yayınları, 1969.
26. Gönlübol, Mehmet et al. Turkish Foreign Policy with Events (1919–1995). Ankara: Ankara University Faculty of Political Sciences Publications, 1969 [In Turkish].
27. Holsti, Kalevi Jaakko. The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1985.
28. İşeri, Emre, and Nevra Esentürk. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Çalışmaları: Merkez-Çevre Yaklaşımı.” Elektronik Mesleki Gelişim ve Araştırma Dergisi 4, no. 2 (2016): 17–33.
29. İşeri, Emre, and Nevra Esentürk. “International Relations Studies in Turkey: Center-Periphery Approach.” Electronic Journal of Occupational Improvement and Research 4, no. 2 (2016): 17–33 [In Turkish].
30. Karamık, İrem and Erman Ermihan. “Quo Vadis, Turkish IR? Mapping Turkish IR’s Footsteps within the Global.” All Azimuth 12, no. 2 (2023): 241–260. doi: 10.20991/allazimuth.1310640.
31. Kut, Şule et al. “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Eğitiminin Geleceği.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 2, no. 6 (2005): 87–105.
32. Kut, Şule et al. “The Future of International Relations Education in Turkey.” International Relations 2, no. 6 (2005): 87–105 [In Turkish].
33. Mehmetçik, Hakan. “Türkiye’de Uluslararasi İlişkiler Çalişmalari Ve “Neden Batili Olmayan Bir Uluslararasi İlişkiler Teorisi Yok?.” Sorusuna Cevap Aramak.” İ.Ü. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 50 (2014): 243–258.
34. Mehmetçik, Hakan. “IR Studies in Turkey and Looking for an Answer for the Question of Why There is No Turkish IR Theories.” Istanbul University Faculty of Political Sciences Journal, no. 50 (2014): 243–258 [In Turkish].
35. Lebedeva, M. “International Relations Studies in the USSR / Russia: Is there a Russian National School of IR Studies?.” Global Society 18, no. 3 (2004): 263–278.
36. Makarychev, Andrey, and Viatcheslav Morozov. “Is “non-Western Theory” Possible? The Idea of Multipolarity and the Trap of Epistemological Relativism in Russian IR.” International Studies Review 15, no. 3 (2013): 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12067.
37. Okur, Mehmet Akif, and Cavit Emre Aytekin. “NonWestern Theories in International Relations Education and Research: The Case of Turkey / Turkish Academia.” All Azimuth 12, no. 1 (2023): 19–44.
38. Oran, Baskin. Türk Dış Politikası Kurtuluş Savaşindan Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar. C. 1. 1919–1980. İstanbul: Iletişim Yayınları, 2001.
39. Oran, Baskin. Turkish Foreign Policy: Facts, Documents, Comments from the War of Independence to Today. V. 1. 1919–1980. Istanbul: Communication Publications, 2001 [In Turkish].
40. Özkoç, Özge, and Pınar Çağlayan. “The Trajectory of International Relations Dissertations in Turkish Academia Between 2000 and 2020.” All Azimuth 12, no. 1 (2023): 107–128. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1218033.
41. Turan, İlter. “Progress in Turkish International Relations.” All Azimuth 7, no. 1 (2018): 137–142.http://dx.doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.328455. Р. 139–140.
42. Voskressenski, Alexei D. Non-Western Theories of International Relations: Conceptualizing World Regional Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
43. Kutlay, Mustafa and Ziya Öniş. “Turkish Foreign Policy in a Post-Western Order: Strategic Autonomy or New Forms of Dependence?” International Afairs 97, no. 4 (2021):1085–1104.
44. Bilgin, Pınar. “Security Dimension: A Clash of Security Cultures? Differences Between Turkey and the European Union Revisited.” In Fifty Years of EUTurkey Relations, edited by Armağan Emre Çakır, 67–83. London: Routledge, 2010.
Review
For citations:
Tsibenko V.V. In the Western Orbit: Turkish Approaches to the Study of International Relations. Journal of International Analytics. 2024;15(2):92-105. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2024-15-2-92-105
Views:
541
Email this article 