The Project of Circassian Return to the Caucasus in the Agenda of Circassian Organisations in Russia and the Diaspora
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2024-15-3-108-121
Abstract
This study examines the evolution of the Circassian ethno-national movement, one of the most prominent in Russia, and its connection to the Adyghe diaspora communities in Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Western Europe, and the United States. In the 1990s, Circassian nationalists proposed the creation of a unified Circassia, either as part of Russia or as an independent state. However, these radical proposals were largely rejected by moderate Adyghe. In response, Circassian activists sought a unifying project for the Adyghe both within Russia and across the diaspora, leading to the promotion of repatriation to the North Caucasus. This agenda, which had long been central to the Circassian movement, gained new importance following the failure to establish a united Circassia and the onset of the Syrian crisis, which forced many Circassians to flee. The study analyzes how Circassian organizations in Russia and abroad have utilized the repatriation initiative to address their challenges, highlighting a shift in the movement. Among Russian Adyghe, radicalism is declining, with growing interest in constructive dialogue with the state in exchange for support in managed resettlement. In contrast, Turkish Circassian organizations do not advocate for repatriation, as it could undermine the Circassian movement in Turkey.
About the Author
Ye. A. Ivanov
Centre for Stability and Risks Analysis, HSE University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yevgeny A. Ivanov, Research fellow
20, Myasnitskaya street, Moscow, 101000
References
1. Borov, A.H. “Politizirovannaya etnichnost’: «Cherkesskij vopros» – eshche odin ochag napryazhennosti na Severnom Kavkaze?.” Rossiya i musul’manskij mir 10, no. 268 (2014): 41–56 [In Russian].
2. Ivanov, E.A., Issaev L.M., Korotayev A.V., Shishkina A.R. “Migracionnoe ekho sirijskogo konfl ikta v regionah yuga Rossii (Na primere KarachaevoCherkesskoj Respubliki).” Politiya. Analiz. Hronika. Prognoz, no. 1 (2019): 167–185 [In Russian].
3. Kudaeva, Svetlana G. Adygi (cherkesy) SeveroZapadnogo Kavkaza v XIX veke: processy transformacii i diff erenciacii adygskogo obshchestva. 2nd ed. Maykop: Magarin Oleg Grigor’evich, 2014 [In Russian].
4. Kushkhabiev, Anzor. Ocherki istorii zarubezhnoj cherkesskoj diaspory. Nalchik: El-Fa, 2007 [In Russian].
5. Markedonov, S.M. “Separatizm na Bol'shom Kavkaze v postsovetskij period: predposylki, itogi, perspektivy.” Aktual’nye problemy Evropy, no. 3 (2009): 39–64 [In Russian].
6. Markedonov, S.M. “S istoriej napereves. Cherkesskij vopros mezhdu Rossiej i Gruziej.” Russia in Global Politics 9, no. 4 (2011): 171–182 [In Russian].
7. Matishov, G.G., Klychnikov, Yu.Yu., Hlynina T.P. “Cherkesskij vopros: istoriya, politika i sovremennoe mifotvorchestvo.” Vestnik Yuzhnogo nauchnogo centra RAN 8, no. 1 (2012): 80–89 [In Russian].
8. Nefl yasheva, N.A. “Cherkesskoe nacional’noe dvizhenie v sovremennoj Rossii: vizual’no-simvolicheskij aspekt.” Metamorfoz vs Transformaciya. Mul'tidisciplinarnyj podhod k izucheniyu istorii adygov v XIX–XXI vv.: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii, 116–132. Rostov-na-Donu: Yuzhnyj federal’nyj universitet, 2013 [In Russian].
9. Sokolova, A.N. “Obshcheadygskoe i lokal’noe v tradicionnoj instrumental’noj kul’ture adygov.” Vestnik Adygejskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, no. 1 (2011): 174–180 [In Russian].
10. Tsibenko, V.V., Tlostnakov, A.A. “Repatriaciya cherkesov kak resurs politicheskoj mobilizacii: transnacional'nyj podhod.” Vlast, no. 1 (2021): 261–270 [In Russian].
11. Tsibenko, S.N. “Mediĭnye tekhnologii nacional’noĭ mobilizacii cherkesov.” Vestnik Instituta sociologii 9, no. 3 (2018): 42–62 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2018.26.3.523.
12. Besleney, Zeynel. The Circassian diaspora in Turkey: A political history. Routledge, 2014.
13. Bram, Ch., Gammer, M. “Radical Islamism, Traditional Islam and Ethno-Nationalism in the Northern Caucasus.” Middle Eastern Studies 49, no. 2 (2013): 296–337.
14. Grebennikov, M. “Is Levithian Back? Circassian Ethnic Mobilization after the 2012 Presidential Elections in Russia.” CEU Political Science Journal, no. 2 (2013): 234–256. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2335026.
15. Korotayev, A., Issaev, L., Ivanov, Ye., and Shishkina, A. “A Troubled Return to the Homeland: Syrian Circassians in Southern Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 76, no. 4 (2022): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2022.2153803.
16. Özgen, N. “Demographic Development and Some Cultural Characteristics of Anatolian Circassians.” In Turkey at the Beginning of 21st Century: Past and Present, edited by Recep Efe, 394–442. St. Kliment Ohridski University Press: Sofi a, 2015.
17. Schneider, M. “‘Dancing’ Ethnicity in the Caucasus and in the Balkans: Kosovo Circassians in the Russian Federation.” In Ethno-Cultural Diversity in the Balkans and the Caucasus, edited by I.A. Jazi, and T. Kahl, 293–320. Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.3508401.13.
18. Tsibenko, V.V., Tsibenko S.N. “Circassian Question: Transformation of Content and Perception.” Bylye Gody 36, no. 2 (2015): 450–460.
19. Zhemukhov, S. “The Birth of Modern Circassian Nationalism.” Nationalities Papers 40, no. 4 (2012): 503–524. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2012.674019.
Review
For citations:
Ivanov Ye.A. The Project of Circassian Return to the Caucasus in the Agenda of Circassian Organisations in Russia and the Diaspora. Journal of International Analytics. 2024;15(3):108-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2024-15-3-108-121
Views:
678
Email this article 