Diplomatic training and Sovereign Foreign Policy: Experience from Asia

This article analyzes the relationship between diplomatic training and the international positioning of countries, using the example of the Asian macro-region. The paper is a case study focusing on the experiences of China, Vietnam, the Republic of Korea, Indonesia, and India. Through detailed country analyses, the paper aims to examine how the quality of diplomatic training correlates with states’ aspirations for autonomy and sovereignty in the emerging polycentric world order. The methodological framework of the study incorporates a multi-paradigm approach, integrating a neorealist perspective of the state as the central actor in international relations and a constructivist analysis of the impact of social practices on diplomatic strategy. An examination of the diplomatic training systems of the countries reveals a complex relationship with their foreign policy and personnel policies. The study finds a non-causal correlation between the foreign policy positioning of countries and their diplomatic training models. A state’s desire to increase its autonomy depends to a greater extent on its role and position in world politics in the space-time continuum. Thus, based on historical experience, among the cases studied, the desire for autonomy is stronger in those states where the colonial trauma is more acute. “Sovereignty” can take different forms depending on the resources available to a state. At the same time, quality diplomatic training ensures the possibility of implementing the sovereign line and provides the necessary human and ideological tools for this purpose.

1. Asmolov, Konstantin V., and Andrey V. Solovyev. “Strategic Autonomy of the Republic of Korea: Intellectual Chimera or Political Reality.” International Analytics 12, no. 2 (2021): 66–69 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-2-49-732.

2. Wang Xuejun, and Du Bingwei. “Conceptual Factors in the Evolution of Western International Relations Theory.” Journal of the Institute of International Relations 1, no. 1 (2008): 9–14 [In Russian].

3. Vershinina, Valeria V. Regional Organizations in Vietnam’s Foreign Policy: A View Through the Lens of the “Middle Power” Concept. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2023 [In Russian].

4. “Greater East Asia”: World Politics and Regional Transformations: A Scientific and Educational Complex, edited by Alexey D. Voskresensky. Moscow: MGIMO University, 2010 [In Russian].

5. Voskresensky, Alexey D. The Chinese School of Comprehensive World Political Studies and Its Development Prospects After the 18th CPC Congress. Moscow: Institute of the Far East, RAS, 2013 [In Russian].

6. Krylov, Sergey A. “The Non-Aligned Movement: History and Modernity.” Observer, no. 3 (2018): 26–43 [In Russian].

7. Kuklin, Nikita S. Conceptual Foundations of Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2023 [In Russian].

8. Kuklin, Nikita S., and Maria A. Shpakovskaya. “The Reform of Indonesia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs as a Reflection of the Evolution of the Country’s Foreign Policy Course (2001–2009).” Voprosy Istorii, no. 9 (2021): 231–234 [In Russian].

9. Kupriyanov, Alexey V., and Gleb G. Makarevich. “India in the Post-Bipolar Era: Thirty Years of Searching for a Place in the World.” International Analytics 12, no. 2 (2021): 74–92 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-2-74-92.

10. Lunev, Sergey I. “India’s Foreign Policy and the Influence of Internal Factors.” MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 1 (10) (2010): 189–201 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2010-1-10-189-201

11. Lokshin, Grigoriy M. “Ho Chi Minh’s Ideas in Vietnam’s Foreign Policy.” Problems of the Far East, no. 3 (2015): 52–57 [In Russian].

12. Starshinov, Alexandr S. “The Dichotomy of Hujinguk-Sonchjinguk and Its Influence on the Political Discourse of the Republic of Korea.” In East Asia: Past, Present, Future. Collection of Articles from the International Scientific Conference of Young Orientalists, 298–306. Moscow, 2022 [In Russian].

13. Starshinov, Alexandr S. “Segyehwa and Ideological Changes in the Republic of Korea (1993–1998).” Problems of the Far East, no. 5 (2022): 94–108 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013128120022119-1.

14. The Foreign Policy Process in the East, edited by Dmitriy V. Streltsov. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2017 [In Russian].

15. Transformation of International Relations in Northeast Asia and Russia’s National Interests, edited by Anatoliy V. Torkunov, and Dmitriy V. Streltsov. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2019 [In Russian].

16. Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. London: Routledge, 2010.

17. Almuttaqi, A Ibrahim. Jokowi’s Indonesia and the World. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2020.

18. Anak Agung, Banya-Perwita, and Ridho Wattimena. Memahami Hubungan Internasional Kontemporer. Salemba, 2019. Anak Agung, Banya-Perwita, and Ridho Wattimena. Understanding Contemporary International Relations. Salemba, 2019 [In Indonesian].

19. Azyumardi, Azra. Indonesia, Islam, and Democracy: Dynamics in a Global Context. Omaha, Solstice, 2006.

20. Benner, Jeffrey. The Indian Foreign Policy Bureaucracy. Routledge, 1985. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429311789.

21. Cooper, Andrew F. Niche Diplomacy. Middle Powers after the Cold War. London: Macmillan Press, 1997.

22. Cooper, Andrew F., Higgott, Richard A., and Kim R. Nossal. Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004.

23. Denisov, Igor E. “Chinese and Western Values in Modern Political Discourse in China.” Social Sciences 47, no. 2 (2016).

24. Fortuna, Anwar Dewi. Indonesia’s Strategic Culture: Ketahanan Nasional, Wawasan Nusantara, and Hankamrata. Griffith University: Centre for the Study of Australia-Asia Relations, Australia-Asia Papers No. 75, 1996.

25. Hadiwinata, Bob S. International Relations in Indonesia: Historical Legacy, Political Intrusion, and Commercialization. International Relations of the AsiaPacific 9, no. 1 (2008): 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcn026.

26. Hakim, Luqman N. Islamism and the Quest for Hegemony in Indonesia. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd, 2023.

27. Harvey, Robert. Global Disorder: How to Avoid a Fourth World War. NY: Carroll & Graf, 2003.

28. Huju, Kira. “Saffronizing Diplomacy: The Indian Foreign Service under Hindu Nationalist Rule.” International Affairs 98, no. 2 (2022): 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab220.

29. Jackson, Karl D., and Lucian W. Pye. Political Power and Communications in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2023.

30. Jaffrelot, Christophe. “India’s Look East Policy: An Asianist Strategy in Perspective.” India Review 2, no. 2 (2003): 35–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736480412331307022.

31. Kubálková, Vendulka, Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert, eds. International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1998.

32. Le, Hong Hiep. “Introduction. The Making of Vietnam’s Foreign Policy under D oi Moi.” In Vietnam’s Foreign Policy under D oi Moi, edited by Le, Hong Hiep, and Anton Tsvetov. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, 2018.

33. Markey, Daniel S. “Developing India’s Foreign Policy ‘Software’.” Asia Policy, no. 8 (2009): 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2009.0025.

34. Masʼoed, Mohtar. Isu Dan Aktor Politik Luar Negeri. Gadjah Mada University Press, 2020. Masʼoed, Mohtar. Issues and Actors of Foreign Policy. Gadjah Mada University Press, 2020 [In Indonesian].

35. Mearsheimer, John J. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19, no. 3 (1994–1995): 5–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078.

36. Miller, Manjari C. “The Un-Argumentative Indian?: Ideas About the Rise of India and Their Interaction With Domestic Structures.” India Review 13, no. 1 (2014): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2014.873670.

37. Neher, Clark D. Southeast Asia in the New International Era. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2013.

38. Snyder, Scott A. South Korea at the Crossroads: Autonomy and Alliance in an Era of Rival Powers. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.

39. Sukma, Rizal. Islam in Indonesian Foreign Policy: Domestic Weakness and the Dilemma of Dual Identity. London: Routledge, 2003.

40. Walt, Stephen M. “Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power.” International Security 9, no. 4 (1985): 3–43.

41. Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979. Yates, Robert. Understanding ASEAN’s role in AsiaPacific Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.