Western Diplomatic training: A Comparative Analysis of Education Models

The article examines the specific features of diplomatic training in Western countries in the context of shifting foreign policy approaches. The analysis focuses on the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Hungary, and Poland, which were selected for their distinct historical and geographical characteristics. The cases are grouped into dyads to facilitate comparisons both between pairs and within each dyad. The comparative framework is based on specific criteria, including the existence of specialized diplomatic training institutions, the range of international relations programs offered, the working language of foreign ministries, the depth and quality of foreign language education at relevant universities, the recruitment of foreign nationals into diplomatic services, the inclusion of international relations history in curricula, the availability of nationally tailored textbooks, and opportunities for professional retraining. The study draws on the conception of elitism reflecting a tetanizing discrepancy between meritocratic discourse and insidious practices devised to restrict access to the diplomatic profession, favoring candidates from elite backgrounds. This trend has reinforced the dominance of political elites in shaping foreign policy, often sidelining the broader public interest. The findings suggest that diplomatic training in these countries is primarily aimed at cultivating a skilled bureaucratic class drawn from privileged social groups to the detriment of meritocratic zeal. However, the increasing standardization of educational models and the prevalence of political appointments to senior diplomatic positions introduce a degree of flexibility into traditional training pathways. The development of diplomatic schools in Western countries highlights their growing dependence on domestic political elites. Not only do these specialized institutions provide professional education, but also act as gatekeepers, screening out candidates deemed unsuitable for diplomatic careers. This exclusivity reinforces the closed nature of diplomatic communities, diminishes incentives to pursue deeper professional expertise, and contributes to a decline in the quality of foreign policy analysis and decision-making.

1. Lebedeva, Marina M., Lobanov, Sergei I. “Podgotovka kvalifitsirovannykh diplomatov v SShA.” USA – Economics, Politics, Ideology, no. 5 (1988): 106–109 [In Russian].

2. Litvak, Nikolay V. “Modern Diplomatic Service as a Reflexive Institution.” Polis. Political Studies, no. 2 (2018): 163–172 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.02.12.

3. Matveev, Vladimir M. Britanskaya diplomaticheskaya sluzhba. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1984 [In Russian].

4. Obichkina, Evgeniia O. Vneshnyaya politika Frantsii ot de Gollya do Sarkozi (1940–2012). Moscow: Aspect Press, 2012 [In Russian].

5. Owsyannickowa, Olga A. “Foreign experience of linguistic training diplomats on the example of the USA.” Diplomatic Service, no. 4 (2018): 36–43 [In Russian].

6. Sushentsov, Andrei A., Neklyudov, Nikita Y., Pavlov Vladimir V. “National Schools of Diplomatic Training: Divergences in the Global Epistemology of International Relations.” Polis. Political Studies, no. 5 (2024): 121–135 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.05.08.

7. Tsygankov, Pavel A. “French Geopolitics.” International Trends, 10 no. 1 (2012): 81–86 [In Russian].

8. Shishelina, Lyubov N. (2022). “The Multi-Vector Nature of Hungary’s Eastern Policy.” Nauchnoanaliticheskij vestnik IE RAN, no. 1 (2022): 35–43 [In Russian]. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran120223543.

9. Al-Jararwah, Mohammad A.H. A Habermasian Analysis of Arab-West Inter-Governmental and InterAmbassadorial Relations: Implications for Western Diplomatic Training. PhD Thesis. New Castle, Australia: The University of Newcastle, 2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25351.62886.

10. Brandt, Enrico, and Christian F. Buck, eds. Auswärtiges Amt: Diplomatie als Beruf. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2005. Brandt, Enrico, and Christian F. Buck, eds. Federal Foreign Office: Diplomacy as a Profession. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2005 [In German].

11. Barder, Brian. What Diplomats Do. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014.

12. Baylon, Donoxti. “The Making of a Diplomat: The Case of the French Diplomatic and Consular Institute as an Identity Workspace.” In European Diplomacy in Practice, edited by Federica Bicchi and Niklas Bremberg, 1st ed., p. 112–133. London: Routledge, 2018. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203703861-7.

13. Berridge, Geoff R. “Diplomatic Education and Training: The British Tradition.” In The CounterRevolution in Diplomacy and Other Essays, 32–49. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230309029_3.

14. Betts-Johnson, Marie. Are Diplomatic Training Programs Meeting the Needs of the Modern Diplomat? Master’s Dissertation. Msida: L-Università ta’ Malta, 2023.

15. Bjola, Corneliu, and Markus Kornprobst. Understanding International Diplomacy: Theory Practice and Ethics. London: Routledge, 2018.

16. Bovens, Mark, and Anchrit Wille. Diploma Democracy: The Rise of Political Meritocracy. Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790631.001.0001.

17. Bramböck, Veronika. Training Mid-Career Diplomats Within MFAs in the 21st Century. Master’s Dissertation. Vienna: Universität Wien, 2020. https://doi.org/10.25365/thesis.63373.

18. Carnes, Nicholas. White-Collar Government: The Hidden Role of Class in Economic Policy Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.

19. Czaputowicz, Jacek. “Multilateral Diplomats of Central European States Before and After 1989.” In Routledge Handbook of International Organization, edited by Bob Reinalda, 244–256. London: Routledge, 2013.

20. de Carvalho, Benjamin, Julia C. Lopez, and Halvard Leira, eds. Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations. New York: Routledge, 2021.

21. Derlien, Hans-Ulrich. “Historical Legacy and Recent Developments in the German Higher Civil Service.” International Review of Administrative Sciences, no. 3 (1991): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.20378/irb-56399.

22. Digol, Diana. Emerging Diplomatic Elites in PostCommunist Europe. Doctoral Thesis. Florence: European University Institute, 2007.

23. Digol, Diana. “Transformation of Diplomatic Elites in Post-Communist Societies.” Historical Social Research 37, no. 2 (2012): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.2.91-107.

24. Duke, Simon. “Diplomatic Training in the European Union.” In The European External Action Service: European Diplomacy Post-Westphalia, edited by David Spence and Jozef Bátora, 403–418. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383037_23.

25. Etchenique, Nicolás C. et al. Los procesos de selección y formación de funcionarios diplomáticos en los principales países del mundo. Madrid: Escuela Diplomática, 2005. Etchenique, Nicolás C. et al. The Selection and Training Processes of Diplomatic Officials in the Main Countries of the World. Madrid: Escuela Diplomática, 2005 [In Spanish].

26. Friedman, Benjamin H., and Justin Logan. “Why Washington Doesn’t Debate Grand Strategy.” Strategic Studies Quarterly 10, no. 4 (2016): 14–45.

27. Gilens, Martin, and Benjamin I. Page. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 3 (2014): 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714001595.

28. Guedes, Armando M. Raising Diplomats: Political, Genealogical and Administrative Constraints on Patterns of Training for Diplomacy. Wien: Diplomatic Academy of Vienna, 2008.

29. Hadfield, Amelia, and Richard G. Whitman. “The Diplomacy of ‘Global Britain’: Settling, Safeguarding and Seeking Status.” International Politics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-023-00489-x.

30. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

31. Isphording, Bernd., Gerhard Keiper, and Martin Kröger, eds. Biographisches Handbuch des deutschen Auswärtigen Dienstes 1871–1945: Band 1–5. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh, 2017. Isphording, Bernd., Gerhard Keiper, and Martin Kröger, eds. Biographical Handbook of the German Foreign Service 1871–1945: Volumes 1–5. Paderborn: Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh, 2017 [In German].

32. Kappeler, Dietrich. “Knowledge Management and Diplomatic Training – New Approaches for Training Institutions.” In Knowledge and Diplomacy, edited by Jovan Kurbalija, 67–69. Msida, Malta: Academic Training Institute, 2002.

33. Korshuk, Alena. “On Intercultural Training of Diplomats.” In Intercultural Communication and Diplomacy, edited by Hannah Slavik, 405–415. Malta; Geneva: DiploFoundation, 2004.

34. Lequesne, Christian. Ethnographie du Quai d’Orsay: les pratiques des diplomates français. Paris: CNRS éditions, 2017. Lequesne, Christian. Ethnography of the Quai d’Orsay: the Practices of French Diplomats. Paris: CNRS éditions, 2017 [In French].

35. Lequesne, Christian, and Jean Heilbronn. “Senior Diplomats in the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs: When an Entrance Exam Still Determines the Career.” Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7, no. 3 (2012): 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119112X635159.

36. Goodwin, Matthew. Values, Voice and Virtue: The New British Politics. London: Penguin UK, 2023.

37. Markovits, Daniel. The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite. New York: Penguin Press, 2019.

38. Murphy, Mary. The Impact of the Internet on Diplomatic Reporting: How Diplomacy Training Needs to Be Adjusted to Keep Pace. Master’s Dissertation. Msida: L-Università ta’ Malta, 2013.

39. Mustafayeva, Shamsiyya, and Astrid SchnitzerSkjønsberg. “Ambivalence in International Dialogue: Implications for Diplomatic Training.” Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice 3, no. 1 (2016): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.7577/fleks.1686.

40. Neumann, Iver V. “To Be a Diplomat.” International Studies Perspectives 6, no 1 (2005): 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2005.00194.x.

41. Porter, Patrick. “Why America’s Grand Strategy Has Not Changed: Power, Habit, and the U.S. Foreign Policy Establishment.” International Security 42, no. 4 (2018): 9–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00311.

42. Piotet, Françoise, Marc Loriol, and David Delfolie. Splendeurs et misères du travail des diplomates. Paris: Hermann, 2013. Piotet, Françoise, Marc Loriol, and David Delfolie. The Splendors and Miseries of the Work of Diplomats. Paris: Hermann, 2013 [In French].

43. Reus-Smit, Christian, and Duncan Snidal, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

44. Rzegocki, Arkady. “Poland’s Foreign Service Faces the Challenges of the Modern World.” Revista Mexicana De Política Exterior, no. 121 (2021): 61–72.

45. Sahlgren, Klaus A. “Patterns of Diplomatic Academies.” Perspectives, no. 11 (1998): 95–97.

46. Sakwa, Richard. The Lost Peace: How the West Failed to Prevent a Second Cold War. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2023.

47. Shale, Viktor. “Post Cold War Diplomatic Training: The Importance of the Multistakeholder Approach to Inter- and Intra-State Conflicts.” In Multistakeholder Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunity, edited by Jovan Kurbalija, Valentin Katrandjiev, 189–200. Malta; Geneva: DiploFoundation, 2006.

48. Stein, Rolando. “Diplomatic Training Around the World.” In Foreign Ministries: Managing Diplomatic Networks and Optimizing Value, edited by Kishan S. Rana, Jovan Kurbalija, 235–265. Malta; Geneva: DiploFoundation, 2007.

49. Szpak, Konrad. “Polska infrastruktura dyplomatyczna.” In Podmiotowosc geopolityczna. Studia nad polską polityka zagraniczna, edited by Krzysztof Szczerski, 131–142. Warszawa: Kontrast, 2009. Szpak, Konrad. “Polish diplomatic infrastructure.” In Geopolitical Subjectivity. Studies on Polish Foreign Policy, edited by Krzysztof Szczerski, 131–142. Warszawa: Kontrast, 2009 [In Polish].

50. Ullman, Richard H. “Education and Training for Our New Diplomacy.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 380, no. 1 (1968): 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271626838000110.

51. Walt, Stephen M. The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of U.S. Primacy. New York: Macmillan, 2018.