Images of the Northen Sea Route in the Russian Official Discourse (2008–2024)
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2025-16-1-78-98
Abstract
This article uses a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of key strategic planning documents and speeches by top government officials from 2008 to 2024 to explore how the image of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) has evolved in contemporary Russian official discourse. Throughout this period, and particularly since 2012, the Russian leadership has steadily increased its attention to the Northern Sea Route, a trend that has become particularly pronounced in the 2020s. Despite the Northern Sea Route being legally defined, official discourse uses various formulations when referring to it, shaping perceptions of the route within strategic documents and speeches by top officials. The main dilemma of Russia’s NSR policy, “internationalisation versus nationalization,” manifested itself in official discourse in the 2010s, with two competing images of the Northern Sea Route emerging. The first, as “Russia’s national transport communication in the Arctic,” is virtually identical to the legislative definition, although it originated earlier. This image usually appears in strategic planning and national security documents that are fundamental to the Russian Arctic.
The second, as the “(International) transport (transit) corridor,” emerged in 2018–2019, coinciding with a sharp increase in cargo turnover along the NSR after the commissioning of Yamal LNG in late 2017. With the exception of one international declaration, this image appears in strategic documents with a socio-economic profile targeted at the domestic audience, i.e. the state authorities. Despite the competing images in the Russian official discourse, there is general continuity in official perceptions of the NSR, particularly in foundational Russian Arctic documents. At the same time, as infrastructure development has progressed, perceptions of the Northern Sea Route have evolved from that of a domestic Russian transport route to that of a competitive global one.
About the Author
N. S. LipunovRussian Federation
Nikita S. Lipunov, Junior Research Fellow, Institute for International Studies,
76, Vernadsky avenue, Moscow, 119454.
Competing Interests:
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
References
1. Bhagwat, Jawahar V. “State Policy for the Development of the Maritime Silk Road. Opportunities for Russia (Example of the Northern Sea Route).” RSUH/RGGU Bulletin Series “Political Science. History. International Relations”, no. 2 (2022): 75–89 [In Russian].
2. Vereina, Larisa V., and Anna V. Kotlova. “The Legal Status of the Northern Sea Route: French Doctrine.” Pacific Rim: Economics, Politics, Law, no. 3 (2019): 70–76 [In Russian].
3. Gavrilova, Kseniya A. “The Northern Sea Route in Russian Official Discourse: Strategies for Determining Functions and Geographical Boundaries.” The Journal of Siberian Historical Studies, no. 3 (2020): 62–75 [In Russian].
4. Galimullin, Eduard Z., and Irina V. Benedyk. “Northern Sea Route in the Context of Russian-American Relations.” International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy 17, no. 4 (59) (2019): 115–134 [In Russian].
5. Grigorishchin, Alexey V.,Tatyana Yu. Sorokina, Maxim Yu. Zadorin et al. “Economical and Legal Barriers and Its Potential Overcoming During the Northern Sea Route Exploitation in the Context of Pan-Asian Trade.” The Arctic and North Journal, no. 46 (2022): 79–106 [In Russian].
6. Gudev, Pavel A. “The Northern Sea Route: Problems of National Status Legitimization under International Law. Part I.” The Arctic and North Journal, no. 40 (2020a): 142–164 [In Russian].
7. Gudev, Pavel A. “The Northern Sea Route: Problems of National Status Legitimization under International Law. Part II.” The Arctic and North Journal, no. 41 (2020b): 130–147 [In Russian].
8. Zhuravel, Valeriy P., and Vladimir P. Nazarov. “The Northern Sea Route: Present and Future.” Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University, no. 2 (2020): 140–158 [In Russian].
9. Zvorykina, Ju.V., Teteryatnikov, K.S. “The Northern Sea Route as a Tool of Arctic Development.” The Russian Economic Journal, no. 4 (2019): 21–44 [In Russian].
10. Kirgizov-Barskii, Arsenii V. “Development of Northern Sea Route: Prospects for International Cooperation.” Russia & World: Scientific, Dialogue 1, no. 1 (2021): 67–77 [In Russian].
11. Lipunov, Nikita S. “The International Dimension of the Northern Sea Route.” The Russian Arctic Journal, no. 1(12) (2021): 78–84 [In Russian].
12. Vasilieva, Valeriya V., and Ksenia A. Gavrilova, eds. Northern Sea Routes of Russia. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2023.
13. Todorov, A. “Russia on the Northern Sea Route: Having the Cake and Eating It Too?” The World Economy and International Relations 65, no. 11 (2021): 123–130 [In Russian].
14. Gavrilov, Viatcheslav. “Russian Legislation on the Northern Sea Route Navigation: Scope and Trends.” The Polar Journal 10, no. 2 (2020): 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1801032.
15. Vylegzhanin, Alexander, Ivan Bunik, Ekaterina Torkunova, and Elena Kienko. “Navigation in the Northern Sea Route: Interaction of Russian and International Applicable Law.” The Polar Journal 10, no. 2 (2020): 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2020.1844404.
Review
For citations:
Lipunov N.S. Images of the Northen Sea Route in the Russian Official Discourse (2008–2024). Journal of International Analytics. 2025;16(1):78-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2025-16-1-78-98