Preview

Journal of International Analytics

Advanced search

The Issue of Maritime Connectivity and Peripherality in the Adriatic

https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2025-16-1-182-197

Abstract

The Adriatic Sea, as part of the Mediterranean Sea, plays an important role in the regional and international maritime connected system. Historically, it served as an important trade route, connecting Europe to the East, thanks to the power of the Republic of Venice. Today, the Mediterranean is one of the busiest waterways in Europe, but the main traffic transits to the North Sea – to the ports of Rotterdam, Antwerp, and Hamburg. In the modern context, there is a perception of this sea as “peripheral“ due to its geographical location and limited access to the world’s shipping routes. The geographical configuration of the Adriatic Sea as a part bordering the continental landmass and partly surrounded by peninsulas or archipelagos makes this sea de facto naturally enclosed and located far away from the main global shipping routes.

The main vector of traffic in the Adriatic is from North to South, with ports orientated towards access to the greater Mediterranean Sea and the delivery of cargo from non-EU countries. The Adriatic is a strategically important region (Adriatic-Ionian macro-region) for the European Union. The EU initiates strategies and promotes projects to improve maritime connectivity and strengthen regional links. The development of pan-European TEN-T transport corridors opens new perspectives for improving maritime connectivity and competitiveness of ports in the northern Adriatic, such as Venice, Koper, Trieste, Ravenna, Rijeka. These ports are becoming an alternative to the traditional Northern European ports of Hamburg – Le Havre, aiming to occupy key positions in the European logistics chain. To a large extent, this competitiveness is ensured, on the one hand, by the development of ‘hinterland’ and, on the other hand, by intermodal transport. Significant challenges remain to modernising infrastructure, improving conditions for intermodal transport, and overcoming the historical legacy of being “peripheral.” The overarching goal of the ports of the northern Adriatic is to become a multiport hub. However, apart from the geographical factor, the competitiveness of the Adriatic ports is increasingly determined by geopolitics and instability – the Houthi attacks are provoking a reduction in shipping traffic in the Suez Canal, which will inevitably affect the demand for Northern Adriatic ports.

About the Author

E. A. Maslova
Institute of Europe (RAS); MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Elena A. Maslova, PhD (Polit. Sci.), Senior Research Fellow; Associate Professor, Department of Integrational Processes, 

2, Nikitskiy Lane, Moscow, 125009.


Competing Interests:

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.



References

1. Alekseenkova, Elena S. “Italian Maritime Economy and the EU Green Deal.” Contemporary Europe, no. 2 (2021): 63–74 [In Russian].

2. Bodrovtseva, Naina Yu. “Systematization of an Assessment Factors and Indicators of the Seaports Competitiveness.” Transportnoe delo Rossii, no. 2 (2017): 105–109 [In Russian].

3. Bonnard, André. Greek Civilisation. Vol. 1. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks, 1994 [In Russian].

4. Kolesnikova, Marina L. “Results of Maritime Spatial Planning in the EU.” Contemporary Europe, no. 2 (2024): 32–44.

5. Kotov, Aleksander V. Strategic Spatial Development in the European Union. Moscow: Institute of Europe, 2024 [In Russian].

6. Marzo Magno, Alessandro. Venice. The History of Water and Land. Moscow: “Slovo”, 2024 [In Russian].

7. Berisha, Erblin. “The Adriatic Ionian Region: Challenges and Opportunities in the Time of Geopolitical Tensions and the Role of EUSAIR.” Economia Marche Journal of Applied Economics, no. 1 (2023): 59–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.57638/1120-9593AIREGION.

8. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1997.

9. Colonna, Pasquale, and Rosanna Pascazio. “Transport between Adriatic and Mediterranean Coasts: Historical and Motivational Analysis for Future Sustainable Development.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, no. 53 (2012): 134–145.

10. Fiske, Bradley A. The Navy as a Fighting Machine. New York: Appleton and Company, 1904.

11. Friedberg, Aaron L. A Contest for Supremacy: China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2011.

12. Kaplan, Robert. Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power. New York: Random House, 2010.

13. Mahan, Alfred Th. The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1890.

14. Modelski, George, and William Thompson. Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993. Houndmills; Basingstoke; Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1988.

15. Scarascia, Luca, Adrian Stanica, Irina Dinu, and Pietro Lionello. “Common Behaviour of the Adriatic and Black Seas Level in the 20th Century as Response to a Mediterranean Forcing.” Geophysical Research Abstracts, no. 19 (2017).

16. Serry, Arnaud. “Shipping in Peripheral Seas: The Case of Baltic Sea Region and Adriatic Sea.” In 19th International Conference on Transport Science, 281–287. Portoroz: Slovene Association of Transport Sciences, University of Ljubljana, University of Split, 2020.

17. Stopford, Martin. Maritime Economics. London; New York: Routledge, 2009.

18. Till, Geoffrey. Seapower: A Guide for the Twenty-First Century. London; New York: Routledge, 2013.

19. Chen Xin, Helena Motoh, Zlatko Šabič, and Nina Pejič. The Role of North Adriatic Ports. Budapest: China-CEE Institute, 2021.


Review

For citations:


Maslova E.A. The Issue of Maritime Connectivity and Peripherality in the Adriatic. Journal of International Analytics. 2025;16(1):182-197. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2025-16-1-182-197

Views: 125


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-8476 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9633 (Online)