"Soft power" as a Concept: a Critical Analysis
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2018-0-3-7-24
Abstract
The focus of the article is on current discussions on the heuristic significance of the "soft power" concept, examines the socio-political and philosophical foundations of the phenomenon, and states the de-Americanization of the soft power discourse and the related changes in the behavior of the new "soft power" actors.
The theoretical basis of the article is the conceptual interpretation of the concept of "power" proposed by Joseph Nye as an alternative to Realistic and Neo-Realistic models of power relations in modern world politics. Nye singled out coercion, influence and attractiveness as equivalent dimensions of force.
The research methodology is based on formal-logical and content-logical methods.
The research procedure first of all is built around the typology of criticism of "soft power" as a concept and the prospects for its overcoming.
In the analysis of the results, it is noted that Nye in the concept of "soft power" had verified the accents of modern socio-philosophical and political-philosophical approaches in relation to the power-discourse of international relations. It is predicted that the theoretical comprehension of the "soft power" will develop, as its use by states will continue. First, it concerns "rising forces" (such as China and India).
In conclusion, it is emphasized that the ability of the state to compete globally in three areas (economic growth, military technological development and value-cultural impact) allows us to talk about it in terms of full power, which is impossible without resorting to the complex phenomenon of "soft power", questions of national identity in a new way and to the non-material grounds of the state.
About the Author
N. Emel’yanova
Lomonosov Moscow State University; State Academic University for the Humanities
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natal'ya Emel'yanova - PhD in Political Sciece, Senior Lecturer, Lomonosov MSU,Political Science Department; Senior Lecturer, SAUH Department of Philosophy
References
1. Anholt S. Brending: doroga кmirovomu rynku [Branding: the Road to the Global Market]. Moscow: Kudits-Obraz, 2004. Anholt S. Competitive Identity. The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2007. 147 p.
2. Bilgin P., Eli§ B. Hard Power, Soft Power: Towards a More Realistic Power Analysis. Insight Turkey. 2008. Vol. 20 (2). P. 5-20.
3. Galkin A. A. Rossiya: dinamika obshchestvennogo soznaniya kak faktor kachestvennykh peremen [Russia: Dynamics of Public Consciousness as a Factor of Qualitative Changes]. Vlast’. 2012. No. 4. P. 4-9.
4. Hall T. An Unclear Attraction: A Critical Examination of Soft Power as an Analytical Category. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2010. No. 3. P. 189-211.
5. Li M. Soft Power. China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics. New York: Lexington Books, 2009.
6. Lukes S. Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds. Millenium — Journal of International Studies. 2005. Vol. 33 (3). P. 477-493.
7. Mattern J. B. Why Soft Power Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics. Millennium — Journal of International Studies. 2005. Vol. 33 (1). P. 583-612.
8. Medcalf R. Townshend A. India and China: Competitive Coexistence in the Asian Century. South Asia in the New Decade / Ed. by A. Palit, G. Spittel. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2013. - URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/suppl/10.1142/8436/suppl_file/8436_chap01.pdf
9. Nye J. Get Smart: Combining Hard and Soft Power. Foreign Affairs. July/August, 2009. - URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2009-07-01/get-smart?page=1
10. Nye J. S. Think Again: Soft Power. Foreign Policy. February 23, 2006. — URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2006/02/23/think-again-soft-power/.
11. Parshin P. B. Dva ponimaniya «myagkoy sily»: predposylki, korrelyaty i sledstviya [Two Understandings of Soft Power: Preconditions, Correlates and Consequences]. VestnikMGIMO-Universiteta. 2014. No. 2. P. 14—21.
12. Parshin P. B. Problematika "myagkoysily”vo vneshneypolitikeRossii [The Issue of Soft Power in Russia’s Foreign Policy].
13. Analiticheskiye doklady. No. 1 (36). March 2013. Moscow: MGIMO-University, 2013.
14. Ramesh J. Making Sense of Chindia: Reflections on China and India. New Delhi: India Research Press, 2005.
15. Ronfeldt D., Arquilla J. Noopolitik: A New Paradigm for Public Diplomacy. Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. Ed. by N. Snow and Ph. M. Taylor. London: Routledge, 2009. P. 352—366.
16. Shambaugh D. China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaption. Berkley; Washington: UC Press; Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2008.
17. Thussu D. De-Americanizing Soft Power Discourse? Los Angeles: USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School University of Southern California, 2014.
18. Ying F. Soft Power: Power of Attraction or Confusion? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. Vol. 4 (2). P. 147—158.
Review
For citations:
Emel’yanova N. "Soft power" as a Concept: a Critical Analysis. Journal of International Analytics. 2018;(3):7-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2018-0-3-7-24
Views:
3130
Email this article 