Preview

Journal of International Analytics

Advanced search

Cases of Hashtagging as a Facilitator of the Protest Movements

https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-4-91-103

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the protest movement on social networks. The novelty of the study is in its comparative analysis of protests in different regions of the world. Its relevance is determined by the need to identify the main trends of the protest movement that began a few years ago and continues to play a huge role in the life of society today – particularly during this period of integration and digitalization – which is confirmed by the statistics given in this article. Special attention is paid to autopoietic organizations: loyal to the regime, limitrophe and radical communities. We emphasize that activism in social networks is characterized by cyclicality and orientation towards international recognition. The work presents universal patterns of the formation of lexical units, expressed in the form of hashtags. It provides information on specific political techniques for using social media platforms in the United States, highlighting the most effective ways of constructing social media posts and using slogans and text that attract the attention of the audience. The paper also reveals the vital role of social networks in the political agenda of African countries such as Uganda, Kenya, etc. The paper highlights the protest movements that took place in Muslim countries during the Arab Spring and provides a brief description of the Hong Kong Umbrella Revolution. And it is the totality of lexical units, expressed in the form of hashtags, that fully reveal the nature of protest movements, providing an opportunity to analyse a specific protest not by one word, but by a set of lexemes to view a subject in various ways.

About the Author

A. V. Alekseev
https://mgimo.ru/people/alekseev-a-v/
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Alekseev, PhD (Linguistics), Associate Professor at English Language Department No. 6

76 Vernadsky Ave., Moscow, 119454



References

1. Grachev, M.N. “On a new interpretation of the relationship between the concepts of ‘agenda setting’ and framing.” [O novoj interpretacii sootnoshenija koncepcij “ustanovlenija povestki dnja”i frejminga] In Development policy, state and world order. Materials of the VIII All-Russian Congress of Political Scientists, Moscow, December 6-8, 2018. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2018 [In Russian].

2. Dyachenko, O.V. “Russian media in social networks Facebook and VKontakte: analysis of audience activity and informational preferences.” [Rossijskie SMI v social'nyh setjah Facebook i v «VKontakte»: praktiki vzaimodejstvija] Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 10. Journalism, no. 1 (2016): 28–45 [In Russian].

3. Kolshansky, G.V. Communicative function and structure of language [Kommunikativnaja funkcija i struktura jazyka]. Moscow: Nauka, 1984 [In Russian].

4. Luhmann, N. Power [Vlast’]. Moscow: Praxis, 2001 [In Russian].

5. Luhmann, N. Social systems. Essay on the General Theory [Social’nye sistemy. Ocherk obshhej teorii]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2007 [In Russian].

6. Patrusheva, Lidia V. “Hashtagging as a new process of communication.” [Heshtegirovanie kak novyj kommunikativnyj process] Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series History and Philology 28, no. 3 (2018): 471–475 [In Russian].

7. Russkij jazyk: jenciklopedija], edited by F.P. Filin. Moscow: Sov. encyсl., 1979 [In Russian].

8. Fedorchenko, S. “Hashtags: mechanism of legitimization of the political regime or a manipulative trap?” [Heshtegi: mehanizm legitimacii politicheskogo rezhima ili manipuljativnaja lovushka?] Obozrevatel–Observer, no. 7 (2019): 28–45 [In Russian].

9. Khetselius, V.E. “Social networks as a tool of political communication.” [Social''nye seti kak instrument politicheskoj kom muni kacii] Nauka bez granic 33, no. 5 (2019): 93–103 [In Russian].

10. Tsymbursky, V.L. Conjuncture of the Earth and Time. Geopolitical and Chronopolitical Intelligence Investigations [Konjunktury zemli i vremeni: geopoliticheskie i hronopoliticheskie intellektual’nye rassledovanija]. Moscow: Evropa, 2011 [In Russian].

11. Ndavula, John, Anne Manuku, and Hellen Mberia “Infl uence of the hashtag context on public opinion formation on sociopolitical issues in Kenya.” Journal of Public Policy and Administration 2, no. 3. (2017): 27–51.

12. Small, Tamara A. “What the Hashtag?” Information, Communication & Society 14, no. 6 (September 2011): 872–95. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572.

13. Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C., Delia Mocanu, Alessandro Vespignani, and James Fowler. “Online Social Networks and Offl ine Protest.” EPJ Data Science 4, no. 1 (2015). doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-015-0056-y.

14. Bastos, Marco Toledo, Cornelius Puschmann, and Rodrigo Travitzki. “Tweeting across Hashtags.” In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media – HT ’13. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2013. doi:10.1145/2481492.2481510.

15. Osgood, Charles E., George S. Suci, and Percy Tannenbaum. The Measurement of Meaning. Illinois: UIP, 1957.

16. McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. “The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36, no. 2 (1972): 176. doi:10.1086/267990.

17. McCombs, Maxwell E., and Donald L. Shaw. “Structuring the ‘Unseen Environment.’ ” Journal of Communication 26, no. 2 (June 1, 1976): 18–22. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01374.x.


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Alekseev A.V. Cases of Hashtagging as a Facilitator of the Protest Movements. Journal of International Analytics. 2020;11(4):91-103. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-4-91-103

Views: 700


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-8476 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9633 (Online)