The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-4-72-90
Abstract
Although information is nothing new to war or conflict, the speed at which it reaches a much wider target audience, and thus its potential impact and consequences, is changing due to the rapid development of information and communications technology. Regime change and information warfare have been around for a very long time in the history of organised human societies. An undertaken review of academic literature demonstrates a great interest today to these concepts in academic, policymaking and practical terms. The present article attempts to track the evolution of the Western conceptual and theoretical thinking on the use of regime change and information warfare, seeking to understand the factors that precipitate it. In the paper I address the following, what is the relationship between information warfare and regime change? The high level of information and communications technology development and persisting leadership globally have allowed the United States to engage in regime change and information warfare more effective, although not without risks. The author considers the most illustrative examples of such engagement and, based on them, concludes that we have seen a shift in motivation from an offensive stance (the desire to spread influence) to a defensive one (the desire to prevent other international actors from gaining influence and power) on the global level. The theoretical method chosen for the analysis is phenomenology, as a means of the reading and analysis of a lived experience as well as a qualitative method will be used to analyse the data, where the goal is to capture the complexity of the object of study.
About the Author
G. Simons
Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies (IRES), Uppsala University;
Humanitarian Institute at Ural Federal University in Yekaterinburg
Sweden
Sweden
Greg Simons, Associate Professor and Researcher Institute for Russian and Eurasian Studies (IRES), Uppsala University; Leading researcher at the Humanitarian Institute at Ural Federal University in Yekaterinburg
P.O. Box 256, SE-751 05 Uppsala,
620002, Ural Federal District, Sverdlovsk region, Yekaterinburg, Mira str., 19
References
1. Abrams, Benjamin. “A Fifth Generation of Revolutionary Theory Is Yet to Come.” Journal of Historical Sociology 32, no. 3 (September 11, 2019): 378–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12248.
2. Armitage, Andrew, and Diane Keeble-Ramsay. “The Rapid Structured Literature Review as a Research Strategy.” US–China Education Review 6, no. 4 (2009): 27–38.
3. Arquilla, John, and Douglas A. Borer, eds. Information Strategy and Warfare: a Guide to Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, 2007.
4. Beacháin, Donnacha Ó., and Abel Polese. “What Happened to the Colour Revolutions? Authoritarian Responses From Former Soviet Spaces.” Journal of International and Area Studies 17, no. 2 (December 2010): 31–51.
5. Bearman, Margaret, Calvin D. Smith, Angela Carbone, Susan Slade, Chi Baik, Marnie HughesWarrington, and David L. Neumann. “Systematic Review Methodology in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 31, no. 5 (October 2012): 625– 640. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.702735.
6. Beck, Colin J. “The Structure of Comparison in the Study of Revolution.” Sociological Theory 36, no. 2 (June 21, 2018): 134–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275118777004.
7. Beilenson, Lawrence. W. Power Through Subversion. Washington DC: Public Aff airs Press, 1972.
8. Bermeo, Nancy. “Rethinking Regime Change.” Comparative Politics 22, no. 3 (1990): 359-77. doi:10.2307/421966.
9. Bjørnskov, Christian, and Martin Rode. “Regime Types and Regime Change: A New Dataset on Democracy, Coups, and Political Institutions.” The Review of International Organizations 15, no. 2 (April 4, 2020): 531–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09345-1.
10. Bob, Cliff ord. The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
11. Bohdanova, Tetyana. “Unexpected Revolution: The Role of Social Media in Ukraine’s Euromaidan Uprising.” European View 13, no. 1 (June 16, 2014): 133–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-014-0296-4.
12. Boréus, Kristina, and Göran Bergström. Analysing Text and Discourse: Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publishing, 2017.
13. Bunce, Valerie, and Sharon Wolchik. “Debating Colour Revolutions: Getting Real About ‘Real Causes.’” Journal of Democracy 20, no. 1 (January 2009): 69–73.
14. Burgos, Russell A. “Origins of Regime Change: ‘Ideapolitik’ on the Long Road to Baghdad, 1993–2000.” Security Studies 17, no. 2 (May 22, 2008): 221–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410802098693.
15. Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. “Conquest and Regime Change: An Evolutionary Model of the Spread of Democracy and Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 48, no. 3 (September 1, 2004): 603–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00317.x.
16. Codevilla, Anthony M. “Political Warfare.” In Political Warfare and Psychological Operations: Rethinking the US Approach, edited by Carne Lord, and Frank R. Barnett, 77–100. Washington DC: National Defence University Press, 1989.
17. Edmond, Chris. “Information Manipulation, Coordination, and Regime Change.” The Review of Economic Studies 80, no. 4 (October 2013): 1422–1458. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt020.
18. Gelman, Susan A. “Concepts and Theories.” In Perceptual and Cognitive Development (Handbook of Perception And Cognition), 2nd Edition, edited by Rochel Gelman and Terry Kit-Fong Au, 117–150. San Diego: Academic Press Inc, 1996.
19. Gough, David. “Weight of Evidence: A Framework for the Appraisal of the Quality and Relevance of Evidence.” Research Papers in Education 22, no. 2 (June 2007): 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189.
20. Haas, Richard N. “Regime Change and its Limits.” Foreign Aff airs 84, no. 4 (July/August 2005): 66–78. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/northkorea/2005-07-01/regime-change-and-its-limits.
21. Hale, Henry E. “Regime Change Cascades: What We Have Learned from the 1848 Revolutions to the 2011 Arab Uprisings.” Annual Review of Political Science 16, no. 1 (May 11, 2013): 331–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212204.
22. Hyett, Nerida, Amanda Kenny, and Virginia DicksonSwift. “Methodology or Method? A Critical Review of Qualitative Case Study Reports.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 9, no. 1 (January 7, 2014). https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.23606.
23. Karpovich, Oleg, and Andrey Manoylo. Colour Revolutions: Techniques in Breaking Down Modern Political Regimes. Bloomington (IN): Author House, 2015.
24. Karpovich, Oleg, and Andrey Manoylo. Politics of Multipolarity: New Challenges and Threats. Moscow: Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Aff airs of the Russian Federation, 2020.
25. Katz, Mark N., ed. Revolution: International Dimensions. Washington DC: CQ Press, 2001.
26. Korotaev, Andrey V., Yulia V. Zinkina, and Aleksandr S. Khodunov, eds. System Monitoring of Global and Regional Risks: Arab Spring 2011. Moscow: URSS, 2012.
27. Kudlenko, Anastasiia. “From Colour Revolutions to the Arab Spring: The Role of Civil Society in Democracy Building and Transition Processes.” Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 23, no. 2–3 (September 2, 2015): 167–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965156X.2015.1116790.
28. Lane, David. “‘Coloured Revolution’ as a Political Phenomenon.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 25, no. 2–3 (September 2009): 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270902860295.
29. Lawson, George. “Within and Beyond the ‘Fourth Generation’ of Revolutionary Theory.” Sociological Theory 34, no. 2 (June 16, 2016): 106–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275116649221.
30. Lawson, Stephanie. “Conceptual Issues in the Comparative Study of Regime Change and Democratization.” Comparative Politics 25, no. 2 (1993): 183-205. doi:10.2307/422351.
31. Lord, Carne, and Frank R. Barnett. Political Warfare and Psychological Operations: Rethinking the US Approach. Washington DC: National Defence University Press, 1989.
32. Mahoney, James, and Richard Snyder. “Rethinking Agency and Structure in the Study of Regime Change.” Studies in Comparative International Development 34, no. 2 (June 1999): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02687620.
33. Manoylo, Andrey V. “Models of ‘Soft Power’ of the Network Terrorist Organisations (On Examples of the ‘Islamic State’, Al-Qaida, the Taliban and ‘Muslim Brotherhood’).” Geopolitical Journal, no. 2 (2016): 37–46.
34. Manoylo, Andrey V., and Konstantin S. Strigunov. Technologies Non-Classical Wars: Genesis, Evolution, Practice. Moscow: Goryachaya Liniya – Telekom, 2020.
35. Massoumi, Narzanin, Tom Mills, and David Miller. “Secrecy, Coercion and Deception in Research on ‘Terrorism’ and ‘Extremism.’” Contemporary Social Science 15, no. 2 (April 2, 2020): 134–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2019.1616107.
36. Muftau, Rufai. “Regime Changes and Uprisings in the Middle East and Parts of North Africa: Some Lessons to be Learnt.” Journal of Education and Practice 7, no. 2 (2016): 107–117.
37. Mullins, Simon, and Sean A. Spence. “Re-Examining Thought Insertion.” British Journal of Psychiatry 182, no. 4 (April 2, 2003): 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.182.4.293.
38. Newman, Saul. “What is an Insurrection? Destituent Power and Ontological Anarchy in Agamben and Stirner.” Political Studies 65, no. 2 (2017): 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716654498.
39. O’Rourke, Lindsey A. “The Strategic Logic of Covert Regime Change: U.S.-Backed Regime Change Campaigns during the Cold War.” Security Studies 29, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 92–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2020.1693620.
40. Ong, Russell. “‘Peaceful Evolution,’ ‘Regime Chane’ and China’s Political Security.” Journal of Contemporary China 16, no. 53 (November 2007): 717–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560701562408.
41. Pawar, Ajaykumar V., and Sean A. Spence. “Defi ning Thought Broadcast.” British Journal of Psychiatry 183, no. 4 (October 2, 2003): 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.4.287.
42. Rauta, Vladimir. “A Structural-Relational Analysis of Party Dynamics in Proxy Wars.” International Relations 32, no. 4 (December 12, 2018): 449–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117818802436.
43. Reisman, W. Michael. “The Manley O. Hudson Lecture: Why Regime Change Is (Almost Always) A Bad Idea.” American Journal of International Law 98, no. 3 (July 27, 2004): 516–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/3181642.
44. Robinson, Piers. “Expanding the Field of Political Communication: Making the Case for a Fresh Perspective Through ‘Propaganda Studies.’” Frontiers in Communication 4, no. 26 (July 2, 2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00026.
45. Sakwa, Richard. Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. London: I.B. Tauris, 2016.
46. Schock, Kurt. Unarmed Insurrections: People Power Movements in Non-Democracies. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2005.
47. Schoon, Eric W., Alexandra Pocek Joosse, and H. Brinton Milward. “Networks, Power, and the Eff ects of Legitimacy in Contentious Politics.” Sociological Perspectives 63, no.4 (2020): 670–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121419896808.
48. Shallcross, Nicholas J. “Social Media and Information Operations in the 21st Century.” Journal of Information Warfare 16, no. 1 (Winter 2017): 1–12.
49. Silverman, David. Interpreting Qualitative Data. London: Sage, 2020.
50. Simons, G. “The Corona Virus Pandemic and Global Transformations: Making or Breaking International Orders?” Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law 13, no. 5 (November 27, 2020): 20–37. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2020-13-5-2.
51. Snyder, Hannah. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: an Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research, no. 104 (2019): 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
52. Sussman, Gerald. Branding Democracy: US Regime Change in Post-Soviet Eastern Europe. New York: Peter Lang, 2010.
53. Szeman, Imre, and Timothy Kaposy, eds. Cultural Theory: an Anthology. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
54. Fridman, Ofer, Vitaly Kabernik, and James C. Pearce, eds. Hybrid Confl icts and Information Warfare: New Labels, Old Politics. Boulder (CO): Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2019.
55. Virkovskiy, Andrey V., Angelina S. Gorbunova, and Maya I. Davletshina. Infl uence of New Media on the Political Processes in Post-Soviet Countries (With the Example of the Colour Revolutions). Moscow: Faculty of Journalism at Moscow State University, 2019.
56. Voronova, Olga E. and Aleksandr S. Trushin, Contemporary Information Warfare: Strategies, Types, Methods, Tricks. Moscow: Aspect Press, 2021.
57. Waldman, Thomas. Vicarious Warfare: American Strategy and the Illusion of War on the Cheap. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
58. Walzer, Michael. “Regime Change and Just War.” Dissent 53, no. 3 (2006): 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2006.0086.
59. Way, Lucan. “The Real Causes of the Colour Revolutions.” Journal of Democracy 19, no. 3 (July 2008): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0010.
60. Zollmann, Florian. Media, Propaganda and the Politics of Intervention. New York: Peter Lang, 2017.
Review
For citations:
Simons G. The Evolution of Regime Change and Information Warfare in the 21st Century. Journal of International Analytics. 2020;11(4):72-90. https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2020-11-4-72-90
Views:
2635
Email this article 