Ислам и прогресс: между традицией и современностью

В ходе переосмысления того, как мусульманские общины исторически реагировали на прогресс и интегрировали его достижения в свою жизнь, авторы статьи попытались вернуться к причинам, по которым исламский мир сохранил глубокий разрыв между традицией и современностью. Анализируя дискуссии мусульманских мыслителей и теоретиков прошлого в богословских и околобогословских кругах, сделан вывод о том, что одним из главных, с философской точки зрения, вопросов для обсуждения является то, что религия стала ассоциироваться больше не с богооткровением, а с традицией. Религия учит непереходящим принципам, в то время как традиции связаны с практиками прошлого, которые привязаны к времени. Значительной части мусульман сложно адаптироваться к новой реальности, и это связано с тем, что религиозность стала ассоциироваться с феодализмом и традиционными ритуалами. Следовательно, мусульмане зачастую связывают сохранение верности своему наследию с внешними признаками, например, с манерой одеваться или совершением ритуалов, при этом не осознавая своей духовной цели или не относясь к ней со всей честностью. Хотя можно было бы дискурсивно отделить религию от области политики, в данной статье тем не менее исследуется, как мусульманский мир переживал застой из-за слияния традиции и богооткровения и как данное слияние парализовало развитие, наряду с другими факторами, такими как конфигурация систем, отвечающих за развитие человеческого капитала, наличие политических интересов и влияние внешних сил. На основе анализа специфики модернизации в Турции и Иране в статье выделяются тенденции, которые препятствуют технологическому прогрессу в странах исламского мира.

1. История Востока в шести томах. Т. 3. Восток на рубеже Средневековья и Нового времени. XVI—XVIII вв. / Под редакцией Р.Б. Рыбакова. – М.: Издательская фирма «Восточная литература» РАН, 2000. – 696 с.

2. AbuSulayman, AbdulHamid. Crisis in the Muslim Mind, translated by Yusuf Talal DeLorenzo. Herndon: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 1993. https://iiit.org/wp-content/uploads/Crisis-in-The-MindComplete.pdf.

3. Ahmad, Feroz. “Politics and Islam in modern Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 27, no. 1 (1991): 3–21.

4. Ahmad, Feroz. İttihat ve Terakki 1908–1914 [Union and Progress 1908–1914]. Kaynak, 1986 [In Turkish].

5. Akyıldız, Ali. “Sened-i İttifak’ın ilk tam metni.” [First full text of the Sened-i Alliance] İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi 2 (1998): 209–222 [In Turkish].

6. Akyıldız, Ali. “Sened-i İttifak’ın ilk tam metni.” [First Full Text of The Sened-i Alliance]. İslam Araştırmaları Dergisi 2 (1998): 209–222 [In Turkish].

7. Al-Alwani, Shaykh Taha Jabir. Issues in Contemporary Islamic Thought. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2005. https://iiit.org/wp-content/uploads/IssuesinContemporarIslamicThought_Combined.pdf.

8. Al-Ghazali, Abu Khamid. Tahafut Al-Falasifah [Incoherence of the Philosophers]. Lahore: Pakistan Philosophical Congress, 1963 [In Turkish].

9. Aytekin, Attila E. “Tax Revolts during the Tanzimat Period (1839–1876) and before the Young Turk Revolution (1904–1908): Popular Protest and State Formation in the Late Ottoman Empire.” Journal of Policy History 25, no. 3 (2013): 308–333.

10. Berkez, Niyazi. Türkiye’de Çağdaşlaşma [Modernization in Turkey]. İstanbul: YKY, 2019 [In Turkish].

11. Can, İslam. “Merkez-çevre düalizmi bağlamında taşranın onto-politik doğası üzerine çıkarımlar.” [Inferences on the Onto-political Nature of the Province in the Context of Center-Environmental Dualism] Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, no. 36 (December 23, 2016): 531–531. https://doi.org/10.21497/sefad.285501. [In Turkish].

12. Chapra, Muhammad Umer. The Islamic Vision of Development in the Light of Maqāsid al-Sharīah. London: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008. http://surl.li/lbcp.

13. Emecen, Feridun M. “Matruşka’nın Küçük Parçası: Nevşehirli Damat İbrahim Paşa Dönemi Ve ‘Lale Devri’ Meselesi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.” [A Small Part of Matrushka: an Assessment of the Era of Nevşehirli Damat Ibrahim Pasha And the ‘Tulip Era’ Issue] Osmanlı Araştırmaları 52 (2018): 79–98 [In Turkish].

14. Faghfoory, Mohammad H. “The Impact of Modernization on the Ulama in Iran, 1925–1941.” Iranian Studies 26, no. 3–4 (September 1993): 277–312. doi:10.1080/00210869308701803.

15. Goodarzi, Mehdi, and Soroush Ghazinoori. “From Developing a Higher Education System to Moving toward a Knowledge-Based Economy: A Short History of Three Decades of STI Policy in Iran in Science and Innovations.” In Iran: Development, Progress, and Challenges, edited by Abdol S. Soofi , and Sepehr Ghazinoory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

16. Gunce, Suheda. “Osmanlı Devleti’nde İlk Daimi Elçilikler ve Diplomasiye Olan Etkileri.” [The first permanent embassies in the Ottoman Empire and their influence on diplomacy] Osmanlı Medeniyeti Araştırmaları Dergisi 6, no. 10 (April 15, 2020): 101–14. doi:10.21021/osmed.668921 [In Turkish].

17. Hallaq, Wael B. “Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed?” International Journal of Middle East Studies 16, no. 1 (March 1984): 3–41.

18. Hanioğlu, Şükrü. A brief history of the late Ottoman Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.

19. Heshmati, Ata, and Seyed Mehran Dibaji. “Science, Technology, and Innovation Status in Iran: Main Challenges.” Science, Technology and Society 24, no. 3 (November 11, 2019): 545–78. doi:10.1177/0971721819873192.

20. Hoodbhoy, Pervez. Islam and Science. London: Zed Books Ltd., 1991.

21. Hussein, Taha. The Days: His Autobiography in Three Parts. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 1997.

22. İnalcık, Halil. Osmanlı Tarihinde İslamiyet ve Devlet [Islam and the State in Ottoman History]. Istambul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları, 2019 [In Turkish].

23. Inglehart, Ronald, and Baker Wayne E. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65, no. 1 (February 2000): 19–51.

24. Islamic Perspectives on Science and Technology, edited by Mohammad Kamali, Mohammad Hashim, Osman Bakar, Daud Abdul-Fattah Batchelor, and Rugayah Hashim. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-981-287-778-9.

25. Issawi, Charles. “Technology, Energy, and Civilization: Some Historical Observations.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 23, no. 3 (August 29, 1991): 281–89. doi:10.1017/S0020743800056300.

26. Kalayci, Murat. “Şeyhülislam Mehmed Esad Efendi ve Eşarîlik-Maturidîlik İhtilafına İlişkin Risalesi.” [Şeyhülislam Mehmed Asad Efendi and his treatise on the Asharilik-Maturidilik confl ict] Hitit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 11, no. 21 (2012): 99–134 [In Turkish].

27. Kara, İsmail. Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde Bir Mesele Olarak İslam 1 [Islam as a Matter In Republican Turkey 1]. İstanbul: Dergah Yayınları, 2019 [In Turkish].

28. Kara, İsmail. Din İle Modernleşme Arasında Çağdaş Türk Düşüncesinin Meseleleri [Issues of Contemporary Turkish Thought Between Religion and Modernization]. İstanbul: Dergah Yayinlari, 2020 [In Turkish].

29. Kuzucu, Serhat. “Katerina Donemi OsmanlıRus İlişkilerinde Kırım.” [Katerina Donemi Crimea in Ottoman-Russian Relations] Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları 185, 2010 [In Turkish].

30. Mardin, Şerif. Yeni Osmanlı düşüncesinin doğuşu [Birth of New Ottoman Thought]. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2015 [In Turkish].

31. Mardin, Şerif. Yeni Osmanlı düşüncesinin doğuşu [Birth of new Ottoman thought] İletişim Yayınları, 2015 [In Turkish].

32. Mazanec, Jakub. “The Ottoman Empire At The Beginning Of Tanzimat Reforms.” Prague Papers On The History Of International Relations 2 (2016): 21–45.

33. Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, Syed. Islam and Secularism. Kuala Lumpur: Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, 1978.

34. Ortaylı, İlber. Mekanlar ve Olaylarıyla Topkapı Sarayı [Venues and events, Topkapi Palace]. İstanbul: Kaynak Kitapliği, 2007 [In Turkish].

35. Ortaylı, İlber. Türkiye İdare Tarihi [Administrative History of Turkey]. Ankara: Cedit Neşriyatı, 1979 [In Turkish].

36. Peters, Francis Edward. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: The Classical Texts and Their Interpretation, Volume III: The Works of the Spirit. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.

37. Sayyid Jamal al-Din al-Afghani. “Response to Renan.” In Modernist Islam, 1840-1940: A Sourcebook, edited by Charles Kurzman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

38. Semati, Mehdi, Mehdi Faraji, and Yalda N. Hamidi. “Elite Discourse on Technology in Iran.” Sociology of Islam 4, no. 4 (October 21, 2016): 323–44. doi:10.1163/22131418-00404002.

39. Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Publishing, 2000.

40. Sezgin, Fuat. İslam’da Bilim ve Teknik [Science and Technology in Islam]. Ankara: Türkiye Bilim Akademisi, 2015 [In Turkish].

41. Tanpınar, Ahmet H. On Dokuzuncu Asır Türk Edebiyatı Tarihi [History of Nineteenth Century Turkish Literature]. İstanbul: Dergah Yayinlari, 2012 [In Turkish].

42. Tezcan, Ercüment, and Aras Ilhan. “Adalet Ve Kalkınma Partısı’nde Euroseptısızm: Avrupa Bırlıgı Destegının Elestırıye Dönüsümü.” [Euroscepticism in The Justice and Development Party: From Support to Criticism of the European Union] Uluslararasi Hukuk Ve Politika 11, no. 41 (2015): 1–35 [In Turkish].

43. Türköne, Mümtazer. Türk Modernleşmesi [Turkish Modernization]. İstanbul: Lotus Yayinevi, 2003 [In Turkish].

44. Ülken, Hilmi Ziya. Türkiye’de Çağdaş Düşünce Tarihi [History Of Contemporary Thought In Turkey]. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası, 2019 [In Turkish].

45. Watt, Montgomery. The Faith And Practice Of AlGhazali. London: George Allen And Unwin Ltd., 1953.

46. Yıldız, Hasan. “Osmanlı Medreselerini Islah Çabaları Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme.” [An Assessment of Eff orts to Reform Ottoman Madrasas] Vakanüvis-Uluslararası Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 2019: 407–445 [In Turkish].