Conceptualizing American Strategy in the Technology War Against China: Economy, Geopolitics, Techno-Nationalism

The paper examines the so-called U.S.-China “tech war” of 2017–2020 in the sphere of cutting-edge digital technologies, its origins, factors, and other aspects, with a focus on the American strategy to limit China’s opportunities for technological development. The purpose of this study is to conceptualise the American tech war strategy and to assess the character and prospects of technology conflicts. The article represents the study with the use of comparative, historical approaches, the elements of systematic economic analysis, and some elements of neorealist and constructivist approaches. Based on the examination of key drivers of the tech war (with regard to the U.S. position), as well as the comparative historical analysis of the observed processes and the instruments implemented to fight for technological leadership, it concludes that technology conflictis a new phenomenon, determined, among other things, by the specifics of digital technologies and economic changes of recent decades, which at the same time preserves natural continuity in relation to the past geopolitical and economic conflicts and existing strategies and tools. Taking into account the peculiarities of the new conflict and digital technologies it deduces that it is possible to describe the U.S. policy in the framework of an adjusted concept of neo-techno nationalism (strengthening national technological potential and sovereignty through global economic instruments). It is noted that in the context of the digital revolution and in the analysis of the clash of superpowers this concept implies that goals are achieved through providing preferential access to such specific development resources as global human capital and big primary data, the formation of systems of standards, etc. In the conclusion, it is highlighted that the U.S. strategy under Trump, which led to a tougher American course in the tech war with China, was determined by objective circumstances as well as by personal traits of the president. In particular, such circumstances include the need to break old ineffective practices to design new solutions and approaches. The author draws a conclusion that in the future the United States will focus on building techno-economic regimes as a more systemic strategy for waging a technology conflict considering adjusted neo-techno national logic.

1. Danilin, Ivan V. “The Impact of Digital Technologies on Leadership in Global Processes: from Platforms to Markets?” [Vlijanie cifrovyh tehnologij na liderstvo v global'nyh processah: ot platform k rynkam?] MGIMO Review of International Relations 13, no. 1 (2020): 100–116 [In Russian]. doi:10.24833/2071-8160-2020-1-70-100-116

2. Danilin, Ivan V. “The U.S.-China Technology War: Risks and Opportunities for P.R.C. and Global Tech Sector.” [Amerikano-kitaiskaia tekhnologicheskaia voina: riski i vozmozhnosti dlia KNR i global'nogo tekhnologicheskogo sektora] Comparative Politics Russia 11, no. 4 (2020): 160–176 [In Russian]. doi: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10056

3. Istomin, Igor A. “Innovation Mirage: The Role of Technological Uncertainty in Military Instability.” [Mirazhi innovacij: «vklad» tehnologicheskogo progressa v voennuju nestabil'nost'] MGIMO Review of International Relations 13, no. 6 (2020): 7–52] [In Russian. doi: 10.24833/2071-8160-2020-6-75-7-52

4. Leksjutina, Yana V. “US-China Relations 2018-2019: Trade War and Decoupling Process.” [Amerikano-kitajskie otnoshenija v 2018–2019 gg.: torgovaja vojna i process dekaplinga] Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija 64, no. 6 (2020): 85–93 [In Russian]. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-6-85-93.

5. Trush, Sergey M. “Donald Trump's trade war against China: events, motivations, internal context.” [Torgovaja vojna D. Trampa protiv KNR: sobytija, motivacii, vnutrennij kontekst] Russia and America in the 21st Century 3 (2018) [In Russian]. https:/rusus.jes.su/s207054760000047-8-1

6. Salickij, Alexander I., and Nelly K. Semenova. “USA–China: an anatomy of a trade confl ict.” [SShA–Kitaj: anatomija torgovogo konfl ikta] Vostok. Afro-Aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost 4, no. 4 (2019): 60–72 [In Russian]. doi: 10.31857/S086919080005960-3

7. Chekov, Alexander D. “The problem of the influence of emerging military technologies on strategic stability” [Problema vlijanija peredovyh voennyh tehnologij na strategicheskuju stabil'nost'] In Sovremennyj miroporjadok i ego vlijanie na nacional'nuju bezopasnost' Rossijskoj Federacii, 532–539. Moscow: FGBOU VO “Moskovskij politehnicheskij universitet,” 2020 [In Russian].

8. Jel'janov, Anatoly Ya. “Science and technology progress and economic policy on the periphery of the world economy.” [NTP i jekonomicheskaja politika na periferii mirovogo hozjajstva] Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, no. 4 (2005): 74–85 [In Russian].

9. Allison, Graham. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides's Trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017.

10. Atkinson, Robert D., and Stephen J. Ezell. Innovation Economics. New Hampshire: Yale University Press, 2012.

11. Chen, Anthony W., Jim Chen, and V. Reddy Dondeti. “The US-China Trade War: Dominance of Trade or Technology?” Applied Economics Letters 27, no. 11 (June 24, 2020): 904–9. doi:10.1080/13504851.2019.1646860.

12. Evans, Paul. “Techno-Nationalism in China–US Relations: Implications for Universities.” East Asian Policy 12, no. 02 (April 6, 2020): 80–92. doi:10.1142/S1793930520000161.

13. Evenett, Simon J. “The Smoot–Hawley Fixation: Putting the Sino-US Trade War in Contemporary and Historical Perspective.” Journal of International Economic Law 22, no. 4 (December 20, 2019a): 535–55. doi:10.1093/jiel/jgz039.

14. Evenett, Simon J. “Protectionism, State Discrimination, and International Business since the Onset of the Global Financial Crisis.” Journal of International Business Policy 2, no. 1 (March 26, 2019b): 9–36. doi:10.1057/s42214-019-00021-0.

15. Fakhari, Hussein. “The Long-Term Impact of Economic Sanctions on the Technological Development of Iran.” In The Development of Science and Technology in Iran, 243–65. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2017. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-57257-8_14.

16. Furnell, Stephen M., and M.J. Warren. “Computer Hacking and Cyber Terrorism: The Real Threats in the New Millennium?” Computers & Security 18, no. 1 (January 1999): 28–34. doi:10.1016/S0167-4048(99)80006-6.

17. Hansen, Lene, and Helen Nissenbaum. “Digital Disaster, Cyber Security, and the Copenhagen School.” International Studies Quarterly 53 (2009): 1155–1175.

18. Hufbauer, Clyde G., Jeffrey Schott, Kimberly A. Elliott, and Barbara Oegg. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. 3rd Edition. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2008.

19. Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, and Euijin Jung. “What’s New in Economic Sanctions?” European Economic Review 130 (November 2020): 103572. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103572.

20. Johnson-Freese, Joan, and Andrew S. Erickson. “The Emerging China–EU Space Partnership: A Geotechnological Balancer.” Space Policy 22, no. 1 (February 2006): 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.spacepol.2005.11.001.

21. Kaempfer, William H., and Anton D. Lowenberg. “Chapter 27 The Political Economy of Economic Sanctions,” 867–911, 2007. doi:10.1016/S1574-0013(06)02027-8.

22. Kennedy, Andrew B. “China’s Search for Renewable Energy.” Asian Survey 53, no. 5 (October 1, 2013): 909–30. doi:10.1525/as.2013.53.5.909.

23. Kim, Mi-jin, Heejin Lee, and Jooyoung Kwak. “The Changing Patterns of China’s International Standardization in ICT under Techno-Nationalism: A Reflection through 5G Standardization.” International Journal of Information Management 54 (October 2020): 102145. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102145.

24. Kshetri, Nir, Prashant Palvia, and Hua Dai. “Chinese Institutions and Standardization: The Case of Government Support to Domestic Third Generation Cellular Standard.” Telecommunications Policy 35, no. 5 (June 2011): 399–412. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.03.005.

25. Li, Minghao, Edward J. Balistreri, and Wendong Zhang. “The U.S.–China Trade War: Tariff Data and General Equilibrium Analysis.” Journal of Asian Economics 69 (August 2020): 101216. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101216.

26. Mascitelli, Bruno, and Mona Chung. “Hue and Cry over Huawei: Cold War Tensions, Security Threats or Anti-Competitive Behaviour?” Research in Globalization 1 (December 2019): 100002. doi:10.1016/j.resglo.2019.100002.

27. Mazzucato, Mariana. The Entrepreneurial State – Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Demos, 2011.

28. Montresor, Sandro. “Techno-Globalism, TechnoNationalism and Technological Systems: Organizing the Evidence.” Technovation 21, no. 7 (July 2001): 399–412. doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00061-4.

29. Nakayama, Shigeru. “Techno-Nationalism versus Techno-Globalism.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 9–15. doi:10.1215/18752160-1504708.

30. Qin, Julia Y. “Forced Technology Transfer and the US–China Trade War: Implications for International Economic Law.” Journal of International Economic Law 22, Issue 4 (December 2019): 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgz037.

31. Shim, Yongwoon, and Dong Hee Shin. “Neo-Techno Nationalism: The Case of China’s Handset Industry.” Telecommunications Policy 40, no. 2–3 (2016): 197–209. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2015.09.006.

32. Steinbock, Dan. “U.S.-China Trade War and Its Global Impacts.” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 04, no. 04 (January 11, 2018): 515–42. doi:10.1142/S2377740018500318.

33. Sun, Haiyong. “U.S.-China Tech War.” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 05, no. 02 (January 8, 2019): 197–212. doi:10.1142/S237774001950012X.

34. Ostry, Silvia, and Richard R. Nelson. Technonationalism and techno-globalism. Wash., D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1995.

35. Wade, Robert H. “The paradox of US industrial policy: The developmental state in disguise.” In: Transforming Economies: Making industrial policy work for growth, jobs and development, edited by José M. Salazar-Xirinachs, Irmgard Nübler, Richard Kozul-Wright, 379–400. Geneva: ILO, 2014. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_315679.pdf.

36. Wade, Robert H. “The Developmental State: Dead or Alive?” Development and Change 49, Issue 2 (March 2018): 518–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12381.