Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the Post-Bipolar System of Coordinate
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-2-130-152
Abstract
Turkey's foreign policy in the first decade after the collapse of the bipolar system retained features of its continuity in comparison with the Cold War: the Kemalist principles of laicism and the choice in favor of further Westernization, with its orientation towards cooperation with the EU and Euro-Atlantic structures remained firmly in place. However, the post-bipolar period demonstrated a significant change in Turkey's foreign policy. The existing explanations for this phenomenon often start either from the appeal to the Islamic identity of the Justice and Development Party as the main reason for the changes, or from the approaches that prioritize Turkey's economic interests and emphasize Turkey's attempts to strengthen economic interdependence with neighbors in the region. Given the increasing complexity of the domestic and foreign policy nexus and the increasingly fluid characteristics of the international environment, it seems that an analysis of Turkish foreign policy in the post-bipolar period requires an alternative conceptual and methodological approach that allows the changes in Turkey's foreign policy to be viewed along three dimensions. In this article, the author resorts to just such an approach. It includes the study of domestic policy, the international context and the transformation of the ideological and institutional support of foreign policy. This approach makes it possible to explain the logic of Turkey's «sudden» reorientation from cooperation with the EU and Western countries in general to attempts to consolidate its leading role in the Middle East and establish itself as a regional hegemon in relation to situational alliances with various state and non-state actors in the broader international context.
Keywords
About the Author
P. V. ShlykovRussian Federation
Pavel V. Shlykov, PhD (History), Associate Professor of the Middle Eastern History Department, Institute of Asian and African Studies, Lomonosov Moscow State University; senior Research Fellow, Department of Asia and Africa, INION, Russian Academy of Sciences; non-resident scholar in research project “Multifactor analysis of the ‘Turn to the East’ in Russian Foreign Policy (achievements, problems, and prospects)” MGIMO University, Lomonosov Moscow State University
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
Competing Interests:
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
References
1. Gadzhiev, Amur G. Turcija – ES: problemy i perspektivy razvitija otnoshenij (1963–2019 gg.). Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies RAS, 2020 [In Russian].
2. Druzhilovskij, Sergey B., Avatkov Vladimir A. “Vneshnepoliticheskie ideologemy Turcii (2002–2012 gg.).” Nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal Obozrevatel’ – Observer 6, no. 281 (2013): 73–88 [In Russian].
3. Ivanova, Inessa I. Jevoljucija blizhnevostochnoj politiki Tureckoj Respubliki v ХХ–ХХI vv. Moscow: Publishing House of Vorob’jov A.V., 2019 [In Russian].
4. Kapitonova, Natalia K., Magadeev, Iskander Je., Pechatnov, Vladimir O. et al. Pravyj populizm: global’nyj trend i regional’nye osobennosti. Moscow: MGIMOUniversitet, 2020 [In Russian].
5. Kireev, Nikolay G. Istorija Turcii XX vek. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies RAS, 2007 [In Russian].
6. Kireev, Nikolay G. “The Islamic-CUM-Turkish Synthesis in the State Ideology of Turkey.” Islam na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke, no. 9 (2015): 229–240 [In Russian].
7. Kudrjashova, Julia S. Turcija i Evropejskij Sojuz: istorija, problemy i perspektivy vzaimodejstvija. Moscow: Institute of the Middle East, 2010 [In Russian].
8. Nadein-Raevskij, Victor A. “Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Winds of Change.” Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no. 2 (2013): 84–92 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2013-2-84-92
9. Nadein-Raevskiy, V. A. “The Struggle of Ideas and ‘The New Turkey.’” MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 2 (47) (April 28, 2016): 22–31 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-22-31
10. Svistunova, Irina A. Irakskij faktor vo vneshnej politike Tureckoj Respubliki (1990-2007 gg.). Moscow: Institut Blizhnego Vostoka, 2008 [In Russian]. http://book.iimes.su/wp-content/uploads/2008/r2008tur_p.pdf.
11. Starodubcev, Ivan I. Transformirujushhajasja Turcija. Moscow: Institute of the Middle East, 2011 [In Russian].
12. Shlykov, Pavel V. “Blizhnevostochnaja dilemma bezopasnosti Turcii: ot sotrudnichestva s Zapadom v bor’be s terrorizmom k opore na dzhihadistov v regional’noj geopolitike.” Current Problems of Europe, no. 4 (2017A): 35–65 [In Russian].
13. Shlykov, Pavel V. “Eurasianism and Eurasian Integration in the Political Ideologies and Practice of Turkey.” Comparative Politics Russia 8, no. 1 (2017B): 58–76 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-1-58-76.
14. Shlykov, Pavel V. “Competitive Multipolarity in the Middle East and the Transformation of Turkey’s Regional Policies in the 2000s and 2010s.” Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics 11, no. 2 (2019): 65–106 [In Russian].
15. Balkır, Canan, and Sedef Eylemer. “Shifting Logics: The Discourses of Turkish Political Elites on EU Accession.” South European Society and Politics 21, no. 1 (2016): 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1147523.
16. Başer, Ekrem T. “Shift-of-axis in Turkish Foreign Policy: Turkish National Role Conceptions before and during AKP Rule.” Turkish Studies 16, no. 3 (2015): 291– 309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2015.1050958.
17. Baykan, Toygar Sinan. The Justice and Development Party in Turkey: Populism, Personalism, Organization. London: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
18. Çağaptay, Soner. “Is Turkey Leaving the West? An Islamist Foreign Policy Puts Ankara at Odds with its Former Allies.” Foreign Affairs – online, (October 26, 2009). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/turkey/2009-10-26/turkey-leaving-west.
19. Çakmak, Haydar, ed. Türk Dış Politikası, 1919–2008. Ankara: Platin, 2008.
20. Çakmak, Haydar, ed. Turkish Foreign Policy, 1919– 2008. Ankara: Platin, 2008 [In Turkish].
21. Cohen, Ariel. “Washington Сoncerned as Turkey Leaving the West.” Turkish Policy Quarterly 9, no. 3 (2010): 25–35.
22. Cop, Burak, and Özge Zihnioğlu. “Turkish Foreign Policy under AKP Rule: Making Sense of the Turbulence.” Political Studies Review 15, no. 1 (2015): 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12088.
23. Criss, Bilge. “Turkish Foreign Policy Toward the Middle East.” Middle East Review of International Affairs, no. 1 (January 1997). https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/meria/meria97_criss.html.
24. Dahlman, Carl. “Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: The Geopolitics of Enlargement.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 45, no. 8 (2004): 553–574. https://doi.org/10.2747/1538-7216.45.8.553.
25. Elekdağ, Şükrü. “2 2/1 War Strategy.” Perception 1, no. 1 (1996). http://sam.gov.tr/pdf/perceptions/Volume-I/march-may-1996/SukruElekdag.pdf.
26. Ercan, Pınar, ed. Turkish Foreign Policy. International Relations, Legality and Global Reach. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
27. Gilpin, Robert. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. New York: Princeton University Press, 2001.
28. Gönlübol, Mehmet et. al. Olaylarla Türk Dış Politikası (1919–1995). 9. Baskı. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi, 1996.
29. Gönlübol, Mehmet et. al. Turkish Foreign Policy with Events (1919–1995). 9th Edition. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi, 1996 [In Turkish].
30. Gözen, Ramazan. “75. Yılında Türk Dış Politikasının Değerlendirilmesi.” Yeni Türkiye 4, no. 23–24 (1998): 1343–1360.
31. Gözen, Ramazan. “The Assessment of Turkish Foreign Policy in the 75th Anniversary.” Yeni Türkiye [New Turkey] 4, no. 23–24 (1998): 1343–1360 [In Turkish].
32. Gunter, Michael M. “Erdoğan and the Decline of Turkey.” Middle East Policy 23, no. 4 (2016): 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12238.
33. Gunter, Michael M., and M. Hakan Yavuz. “Turkish Paradox: Progressive Islamists versus Reactionary Secularists.” Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 16, no. 3 (2007): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10669920701616633.
34. Hale, William. Turkish Foreign Policy since 1774. The 3rd edition. London: Routledge, 2012.
35. Kara, Mehtap, and Ahmet Sözen. “Change and Continuity in Turkish Foreign Policy: Evaluating pre-AKP and AKP Periods’ National Role Conceptions.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 13, no. 52 (2016): 47–66.
36. Karaosmanoğlu, Kerem. “The Discourse of üst akıl: a Search for Hegemony in the Turkish Media.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 21, no. 1 (2021): 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2021.1872233.
37. Keyman, E. Fuat. “Modernity, Secularism and Islam: The Case of Turkey.” Theory, Culture & Society 24, no. 2 (2007): 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075008.
38. Kirişçi, Kemal. “The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40 (2009): 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600005203.
39. Kılınç, Ramazan. “İdeoloji ve Dış Politika: Türkiye’de Kemalist (1930–1939) ve İslamcı (2011–2015) Dış Politikaların Karşılaştırmalı Bir Analizi.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 13, no. 52 (2006): 67–88.
40. Kılınç, Ramazan. “Ideology and Foreign Policy: The Comparative Analysis of Kemalist (1930–1939) and Islamist (2011–2015) Foreign Policy.” Uluslararası İlişkiler [International Relations] 13, no. 52 (2006): 67–88 [In Turkish].
41. Müftüler-Bac, Meltem. “Turkey’s Predicament in the Post-Cold War Era.” Futures 28, no. 3 (1996): 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(96)00005-5.
42. Müftüler-Baç, Meltem. “Turkish Foreign Policy, its Domestic Determinants and the Role of the European Union.” South European Society and Politics 16, no. 2 (2011): 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.577947.
43. Neset, Siri, Mustafa Aydın, Hasret Dikici Bilgin, Metin Gürcan, Arne Strand. Turkish Foreign Policy: Structures and Decision-making Processes. (CMI Report R 2019: 3). https://www.cmi.no/publications/6854-turkish-foreignpolicy-structures-and-decision-making-processes.
44. Oğuzlu, Tarık. “Middle Easternization of Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Does Turkey Dissociate from the West?” Turkish Studies 9, no. 1 (2008): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840701813960.
45. Oktav, Özden Zeynep, ed. Turkey in the 21st Century. Quest for a New Foreign Policy. London: Routledge, 2011.
46. Onar, Nora Fisher. “Echoes of a Universalism Lost: Rival Representations of the Ottomans in Today’s Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 45, no. 2 (2009): 229–241, https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200802697290.
47. Öniş, Ziya, and Mustafa Kutlay. “Rising Powers in a Changing Global Order: The Political Economy of Turkey in the Age of BRICS.” Third World Quarterly 34, no. 8 (2013): 1409–1426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.831541.
48. Oran, Baskın, ed. Türk Dış Politikası: Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar. Cilt 1–3. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2006–2013.
49. Oran, Baskın, ed. Turkish Foreign Policy: From the War of Independence to Nowadays. Facts, Documents, Commentaries. Volumes 1–3. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2006–2013 [In Turkish].
50. Özer-İmer, Itir; Kugler, Jacek, and Hilton L. Root. “Turkey and the West: Bargaining for Realignment.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 21, no. 2 (2013): 218–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2013.815465.
51. Özkan, Behlül. “Turkey, Davutoglu and the Idea of Pan-Islamism.” Survival 56, no. 4 (2014): 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.941570.
52. Öztürk, Asiye. “Turkey – Europe’s Bridge to the Middle East.” Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 2, no. 2 (2015): 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2008.11446314.
53. Sevin, Efe. Public Diplomacy and the Implementation of Foreign Policy in the US, Sweden and Turkey. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
54. Sönmezoğlu, Faruk, ed. Türk Dış Politikasının Analizi. İstanbul: Der Yayınları, 1994.
55. Sönmezoğlu, Faruk, ed. The Analysis of Turkish Foreign Policy. İstanbul: Der Yayınları, 1994 [In Turkish].
56. Sönmezoğlu, Faruk. II. Dünya Savaşı’ndan günümüze: Türk dış politikası. İstanbul: Der Yayınları, 2006.
57. Sönmezoğlu, Faruk. From the Second World War to Nowadays: Turkish Foreign Policy. İstanbul: Der Yayınları, 2006 [In Turkish].
58. Sözen, Ahmet. “A Paradigm Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy: Transition and Challenges.” Turkish Studies 11, no. 1 (2010): 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683841003747062.
59. Tamiz, Sam, and Henry Johnson. “How Iran Dominates the Middle East.” National Interest, (June 18, 2015). https://nationalinterest.org/feature/how-irandominates-the-middle-east-13136.
60. Taş, Hakkı. “The Chronopolitics of National Populism.” Identities. Global Studies in Culture and Power – Online, (March 5, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2020.1735160.
61. Turunç, Hasan. “The Post-Westernisation of EUTurkey Relations.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 19, no. 4 (2011): 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2011.639989.
62. Uslu, Nasuh. Turkish Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Period. London: Nova Science Publishers, 2004.
63. Yalvaç, Faruk. “Approaches to Turkish Foreign Policy: A Critical Realist Analysis.” Turkish Studies 15, no. 1 (2014): 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2014.892238.
64. Yeşilyurt, Nuri. “Explaining Miscalculation and Maladaptation in Turkish Foreign Policy Toward the Middle East during the Arab Uprisings: A Neoclassical Realist Perspective.” All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 6, no. 2 (2017): 65–83. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.310151.
65. Yükselen, Hasan. Strategy and Strategic Discourse in Turkish Foreign Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
Review
For citations:
Shlykov P.V. Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the Post-Bipolar System of Coordinate. Journal of International Analytics. 2021;12(2):130-152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2021-12-2-130-152