Strategic Autonomy for ROK: Intellectual Pipe Dream or Political Reality?

The discourse of “strategic autonomy,” which has gained popularity in the Republic of Korea in recent years, has yet to undergo serious theoretical revision. This article attempts to fill the gap by examining the South Korean discourse of “middle powers,” from which the discourse of “strategic autonomy” grew, and the socio-historical analysis of Korean perceptions of political subjectivity, which developed under the powerful influence of both Western ideas from the early 20th century and the political realities of the military alliance with the United States. In the first section the authors examine the specifics of South Korea’s use of the concept of “strategic autonomy” in relation to its foreign policy strategy. This concept is examined using a constructivist paradigm. In the second section, the authors examine the discourse of “middle power,” around which the concept of “strategic autonomy” is built. Compared to the former, this concept is quite elaborated in Western and Korean political discourses. Finally, the third section of the article examines the evolution of these concepts in South Korean discourse. The circumstances of the formation and development of the military-political alliance with the United States play an extremely important role in this evolution, and the discourse around its prospects largely determines the features of the country’s domestic policy. The authors conclude that from the academic point of view the concept of “strategic autonomy” can only be considered as a discursive category close to the concept of “hedging,” but it is an important element of South Korea’s political identity and an essential factor of internal political struggle.

1. Alexeyeva, T. A. “Think Like Constructivist: Discovering a Polyphonic World.” Comparative Politics (Russia) 5, no. 1(14) (July 8, 2015): 4–21 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.18611/2221-3279-2014-5-1(14)-4-21

2. Vorontsov, A., T. Ponka, and E. Varpahovskis. “Middlepowermanship in Korean Foreign Policy.” International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye Protsessy 18, no. 1 (January 26, 2021): 89–105 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2020.18.1.60.5.

3. Dyachkov, I. “Rossijsko-yuzhnokorejskie politicheskie svyazi: 30 let spustya.” In Korejskij poluostrov: istoriya i sovremennost’. Moscow: IDV RAS, 2020A [In Russian].

4. Dyachkov, Ilya. “Ostrov Tokto v yuzhnokorejskoyaponskih otnosheniyah: istoriya, pamyat’, politika.” Elektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel’nyj zhurnal “Istoriya” 11, no. 98 (2020B) [In Russian].

5. Istomin, I., and A. Baykov. “Dynamics of International Alliances in an Unbalanced World Structure.” World Economy and International Relations 63, no. 1 (2019): 34–48 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-1-34-48

6. Lukin, A. “Russia and the Korean Peninsula: Political Realism and Empathy.” Polis. Political Studies, no 3. (2021): 182–191 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.03.12

7. Lukin, A. “The Regional Security Complex Theory and East Asia.” Ojkumena. Regionovedcheskie issledovaniya, no. 2 (2011): 7–19 [In Russian].

8. Yungblud, V., and Sadakov, D. “Diplomatic Support of US Involvement in the Korean War June 25 – July 6 1950: Crisis Response Experience.” MGIMO Review of International Relations 4, no. 61 (September 1, 2018): 241–61 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2018-4-61-241-261.

9. Safranchuk, Ivan A., and F. Lukyanov A. “The Modern World Order: Structural Realities and Great Power Rivalries.” Polis. Political Studies, no. 3 (2021): 57–76 [In Russian].

10. Asmolov, Konstantin V. “Lessons of Korean Democratization for Modern Russia.” Russia in Global Affairs 17, no. 2 (2019): 174–200. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2019-17-2-174-200.

11. Bong, Y. “Continuity Amidst Change: The Korea – United States Alliance.” In Global Allies: Comparing US Alliances in the 21st Century, edited by M. Wesley, 45–58. ANU Press: Australia, 2017.

12. Carr, Andrew. “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68, no. 1 (January 31, 2014A): 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.840264.

13. Carr, A. “Is Australia a Middle Power?” Australian Outlook. Australian Journal of International Affairs. March 07, 2014B. https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/is-australia-a-middle-power/

14. Cha, V. “America’s Alliances in Asia: The Coming ‘Identity Crisis’ with the Republic of Korea?” In: Jr. Boose, W. Donald, Y. Balbina, M. Hwang, P. Morgan, and A. Scobell, eds. Recalibrating the U.S.-Republic of Korea Alliance. Strategic Studies Institute (SSI), 2003.

15. Chapnick, Adam. “The Middle Power.” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 7, no. 2 (January 1999): 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.1999.9673212.

16. Chapnick, Adam. “The Canadian Middle Power Myth.” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 55, no. 2 (June 25, 2000): 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070200005500202.

17. Choe Wongi. “ ‘New Southern Policy’: Korea’s Newfound Ambition in Search of Strategic Autonomy.” Asie.Visions, No. 118, Ifri. January 2021. www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/choe_new_southern_policy_korea_2021.pdf.

18. Choi, Y. “South Korea’s Regional Strategy and Middle Power Activism.” Journal of East Asian Affairs 23, no. 1 (2015): 47–67.

19. Chun, Chaesung. “Theoretical Approaches to Alliance: Implications on the R.O.K.–U.S. Alliance.” Journal of International and Area Studies 7, no. 2 (2000): 71–88.

20. “Chapter Two: Comparative Defence Statistics.” The Military Balance 121, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/04597222.2021.1868791.

21. Cooper, A., R. Higgott, and K. Nossal. Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order. UBC Press: Vancouver, 1993.

22. Cox, Robert W. “Middlepowermanship, Japan, and Future World Order.” International Journal 44, no. 4 (1989): 823. https://doi.org/10.2307/40202638.

23. Dyachkov, Ilya. “Collective Memory And Politics: ‘Comfort Women’ In Current Relations Between South Korea And Japan.” Russian Japanology Review, no. 2. (2020): 68–87.

24. Easley, Leif-Eric, and Kyuri Park. “South Korea’s Mismatched Diplomacy in Asia: Middle Power Identity, Interests, and Foreign Policy.” International Politics 55, no. 2 (March 19, 2018): 242–63. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0073-5.

25. Green, M. J. “Is the Era of Korean Middle Power Diplomacy Over? A Realist Perspective.” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 31 (2019): 1–20.

26. Jackson, Robert H. Quasi-states: Sovereignty, International relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

27. Jordaan, Eduard. “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers.” Politikon 30, no. 1 (May 30, 2003): 165–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282.

28. Jordaan, Eduard. “The Emerging Middle Power Concept: Time to Say Goodbye?” South African Journal of International Affairs 24, no. 3 (July 3, 2017): 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2017.1394218.

29. Kim, S. “South Korea’s Middle-Power Diplomacy: Changes and Challenges.” Chatham House Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2016. https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2016-06-22-south-korea-middle-power-kim.pdf.

30. Kim, Sung-Mi, Sebastian Haug, and Susan Harris Rimmer. “Minilateralism Revisited: MIKTA as Slender Diplomacy in a Multiplex World.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 24, no. 4 (2018): 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02404001.

31. Korhonen, Pekka, and Tomoomi Mori. “North Korea as a Small Great Power.” The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 17, no. 5 (2019): 1–25.

32. Leonard, Mark, and Jeremy Shapiro. “Strategic Sovereignty: How Europe Can Regain the Capacity to Act.” European Council on Foreign Relations, 2019. https://ecfr.eu/archive/page/-/1_Empowering_EU_member_states_with_strategic_sovereignty.pdf.

33. Morrow, James D. “Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances.” American Journal of Political Science 35, no. 4 (November 1991): 904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111499.

34. Morrow, James D. “Arms versus Allies: Trade-Offs in the Search for Security.” International Organization 47, no. 2 (1993): 207–33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027922.

35. Myers, B. North Korea’s Juche Myth. Sthele Press, 2015.

36. Ping, Jonathan H. Middle Power statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia and the Asia Pacific. London: Ashgate, 2005.

37. Robertson, Jeffrey. “South Korea as a Middle Power: Capacity, Behavior, and Now Opportunity.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 16, no. 1 (2007): 151–174.

38. Robertson, Jeffrey. “Middle-Power Definitions: Confusion Reigns Supreme.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 71, no. 4 (July 4, 2017): 355–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1293608.

39. Saxer, Carl J. “Capabilities and Aspirations: South Korea’s Rise as a Middle Power.” Asia Europe Journal 11, no. 4 (December 18, 2013): 397–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-013-0361-7.

40. Shin, Gi-Wook, and Hilary Jan Izatt. “Anti-American and Anti-Alliance Sentiments in South Korea.” Asian Survey 51, no. 6 (November 1, 2011): 1113–33. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2011.51.6.1113.

41. Shin, Soon-ok. “South Korea’s Elusive Middlepowermanship: Regional or Global Player?” The Pacific Review 29, no. 2 (March 14, 2016): 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2015.1013494.

42. Shin, D.M. “The Concept of Middle Power and the Case of the ROK: A Review.” In: F. Rüdiger, J. Hoare, P. Köllner, and S. Pares, eds. Korea 2012: Politics, Economy and Society. Leiden: Brill, 2012.

43. Snyder, Glenn H. “The Security Dilemma in Alliance Politics.” World Politics 36, no. 4 (July 13, 1984): 461–95. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010183.

44. Snyder, S. South Korea at the Crossroads: Autonomy and Alliance in an Era of Rival Powers. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.

45. Sohn, Y. “Searching for a New Identity: South Korea’s Middle Power Diplomacy.” Fride Policy Brief 212, (2015): 1–6.

46. “South Korea’s Security And Autonomy Of The United States Regarding The Recognition And Behavioral Research.” Korean Strategy Reform Institute 23, no. 3 (2016): 91–125. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE07047774 [In Korean].

47. Soo Hyung Lee. “The Linkage Between South-North Korean Politics and Great Power Politics in Northeast Asia.” World Politics 16, no.0 (2012): 141–170 [In Korean].