Memory and Identity Politics in the European Union: Related Concepts, Disparate Practices
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-79-93
Abstract
The author characterizes memory politics and identity politics as analytical categories formed in a highly competitive field of meanings and interpretations. The methodological approach is social constructivism, which represents the mainstream in the study of memory and identity politics. However, the author considers it necessary to take into account the socio-cultural framework of actions performed by various actors that shape memory and identity. In addition, sharing the methodologically innovative approach advanced by I.S. Semenenko to the definition and analysis of identity politics, the author applies it to the object of her research. The article proposes using the concept of securitization to study not only the politics of memory, but also the identity politics pursued by the European Union. The shaping of a European identity on the basis of memory politics involves many problems, both supranational and national. This article deals primarily with supranational policy, but national discourses of memory and identity politics are also taken into account. In this context, the concepts per se, which have categorical conjugacy, turn out to be associated with courses characterized by considerable discord. The seemingly unshakable foundations of memory politics, established after World War II, are being challenged by the new member states of the European Union, shaping different practices of remembrance and forgetting. As a result, implying the possibility of different interpretations and harmonization of discourses, dialogical memory as the foundation of European identity is giving way to the securitization of memory politics and identity politics, which means their instrumental use to legitimize specific policies.
About the Author
L. A. Fadeeva
Perm State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyubov A. Fadeeva, PhD in History, Professor at the Political Sciences Department, Faculty of History and Politics
614068, Perm, ul. Bukireva, 15
References
1. Ассман, А. Длинная тень прошлого: Мемориальная культура и историческая политика. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2018. Assmann, Aleida. Shadows of Trauma: Memory and the Politics of Postwar Identity. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2018 [In Russian].
2. Борозняк, А.И. Искупление. Нужен ли России германский опыт преодоления тоталитарного прошлого? – М.: Независимое издательство «Пик», 1999. Boroznyak, Alexander I. Iskuplenie. Nuzhen li Rossii germanskii opyt preodoleniya totalitarnogo proshlogo? Moscow: Nezavisimoe izdatel’stvo «Pik», 1999 [In Russian].
3. Борозняк, А.И. Жестокая память. Нацистский рейх в восприятии немцев второй половины XX века и начала XXI века. – М.: Политическая энциклопедия, 2014. Boroznyak, Alexander I. Zhestokaya pamyat’. Natsistskii reikh v vospriyatii nemtsev vtoroi poloviny XX veka i nachala XXI veka. Moscow: Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, 2014.
4. Васильев, А. Memory studies: единство парадигмы – многообразие объектов // Новое литературное обозрение. – 2012. – № 5 (117). – С. 461–480. Vasiliev, Aleksey. “Memory Studies: Paradigm Unity – Object Variety”. New literary review, no. 5 (117) (2012): 461–480 [In Russian].
5. Идентичность. Личность. Общество. Политика. Энциклопедическое издание. / под ред. И.С. Семененко. – М.: Весь мир, 2017. Identichnost'. Lichnost'. Obshchestvo. Politika, edited by Irina S. Semenenko. Moscow: Ves’ mir, 2017 [In Russian].
6. Историческая политика в XXI веке / Под ред. А. Миллера и М. Липман. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2012. Istoricheskaya politika v XXI veke, edited by Aleksey Miller, and Maria Lipman. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2012 [In Russian].
7. Котта, М. Европейская идентичность: вызовы современности // Идентичность. Личность. Общество. Политика. Энциклопедическое издание / под ред. И.С. Семененко. – М.: Весь мир, 2017. – С. 184–193. Kotta, Maurizio. “Evropejskaya identichnost': vyzovy sovremennosti.”. In Identichnost'. Lichnost'. Obshchestvo. Politika, edited by Irina S. Semenenko, 184–193. Moscow: Ves’ mir, 2017 [In Russian].
8. Курилла, И.И. Битва за прошлое. Как политика меняет историю. – М.: Альпина Паблишер, 2021. Kurilla, Ivan I. Bitva za proshloe. Kak politika menyaet istoriyu. Moscow: Al’pina Pablisher, 2021 [In Russian].
9. Маколи, М. Историческая память и общество сограждан // Pro et Contra. – 2011. – Т. 15. – № 1–2 (51). – С. 134–149. McAuley, Mary. “Historical Memory and the Community of Citizens.” Pro et Contra 15, no. 1–2 (51) (January – April, 2011): 134–149 [In Russian].
10. Маркедонов, С.М., Шнирельман, В.А., Фадеева, Л.А., Граля, Х., Липман, М.А., Тесля, А.А. Дискуссия о книге «Политика памяти в современной России и странах Восточной Европы. Акторы, институты, нарративы» // Новое прошлое. – 2020. – Т. 3. – С. 256–302. http://www.doi.org/10.18522/2500-3224-2020-3-256-302. Markedonov, Sergey M., Victor А. Shnirelman, Lyubov A. Fadeeva, Hieronim Grala, Maria А. Lipman, and Andrey A. Teslya. “Discussion of the Book ‘The Politics of Memory in Contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe. Actors, Institutes, Narratives.” The New Past, no. 3 (2020): 256–302 [In Russian].
11. Мчедлова, М.М., Казаринова, Д.Б. Политика идентичности: конкуренция новых теоретических смыслов и политических стратегий // Политическая наука. – 2020. – № 4. – С. 13–35. http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.04.01 Mchedlova, Maria. M., and Kazarinova Daria B. “The Identity Politics: Competition of New Theoretical Meanings and Political Strategies.” Political science, no. 4 (2020): 13–35 [In Russian].
12. Обердорфф, А. Политическое становление Европы // Европейская интеграция: современное состояние и перспективы. – Минск, 2001. Oberdorff, Henri. “Politicheskoe stanovlenie Evropy.” In Evropeiskaya integratsiya: sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy. Minsk, 2001.
13. Политика памяти в современной России и странах Восточной Европы. Акторы, институты, нарративы: коллективная монография / под ред. А.И. Миллера, Д.В. Ефременко. – СПб.: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2020. – 632 с. Politika Pamyati v Sovremennoj Rossii i Stranah Vostochnoj Evropy. Aktory, Instituty, Narrativy, edited by Aleksey. I. Miller, and Dmitry V. Efremenko. St. Petersburg: EUSP Press, 2020 [In Russian].
14. Семененко, И.С. Прошлое на переднем крае политики идентичности // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. – 2018. – Т. 62. – № 11. – С. 65–76. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-11-65-76. Semenenko, Irina S. “History on the Frontline of Identity Politics.” World Economy and International Relations 62, no. 11 (2018): 65–76 [In Russian].
15. Семененко, И.С. Политика идентичности и идентичность в политике: этнонациональные ракурсы, европейский контекст // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2016. – № 4. – С. 8–28. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.04.03. Semenenko, Irina S. “Identity Politics and Identities in Politics: Interethnic Perspectives in a European Context.” Polis. Political Studies, no. 4 (2016): 8–28 [In Russian].
16. Семененко, И.С. Новые ракурсы политики идентичности: трудная память в музеях истории ХХ века // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. – 2020. – Т. 64. – № 5. – С. 6–32. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-5-16-32. Semenenko, Irina S. “New Dimensions of Identity Politics: Contested Memories in History Museums of the 20th Century.” World Economy and International Relations 64, no. 5 (2020): 16–32 [In Russian].
17. Традиционные ценности в меняющемся мире: Северная Америка, Западная и Восточная Европа / гл. ред. Д.Б. Вершинина. – СПб.: Маматов, 2021. – 272 с. Traditsionnye tsennosti v menyayushchemsya mire: Severnaya Amerika, Zapadnaya i Vostochnaya Evropa, edited by Daria. B. Vershinina. St. Petersburg: Mamatov, 2021 [In Russian].
18. Фадеева, Л.А. Современные вызовы политики идентичности в ЕС // Современная Европа. – 2021. – № 7. – с 18–26. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope720211826. Fadeeva, Lyubov. “Contemporary Policy Challenges Identity in the EU.” Contemporary Europe, no. 7 (December 31, 2021): 18–26 [In Russian]. https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope720211826.
19. Фадеева, Л.А., Плотников, Д.С. Опыт мировых войн в политике идентичности и выстраивании стратегии безопасности // Региональные стратегии международной безопасности: Россия, ЕС и Ближний Восток. – М.: Научный консультант, 2019. – С. 213–238. Fadeeva, Lyubov A., and Dmitry S. Plotnikov. “Opyt mirovykh voin v politike identichnosti i vystraivanii strategii bezopasnosti.” In Regional’nye strategii mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti: Rossiya, ES i Blizhnii Vostok, 213–238. Moscow: Nauchnyi konsul’tant, 2019 [In Russian].
20. Шеррер, Ю. Отношение к истории в Германии и Франции: проработка прошлого, историческая политика, политика памяти // Pro et Contra. – 2009. – Т. 13. – № 3–4 (46). – С. 89–108. Scherrer, Jutta. “Germany and France: Processing the past.” Pro et Contra 13, no. 3–4 (46) (May – August, 2009): 89–108 [In Russian].
21. Berger, Stefan. “Nordic National Histories in Comparative European Perspective.” Historisk Tidsskrift 95, no. 1 (April, 2016): 67–96. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-2944-2016-01-04
22. Bernhard, Michael, and Jan Kubik, eds. Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2016.1207308
23. Cerutti, Furio, and Enno Rudolph, eds. A Soul for Europe: On the Political and Cultural Identity of the Europeans. Leuven: Peeters, 2001.
24. Eder, Klaus, and Sören Carlson. “Europe As a Narrative Laboratory. Klaus Eder on European Identity, Populist Stories, and the Acid Bath of Irony.” Culture, Practice & Europeanization, 5, no. 1 (August, 2020): 102–117.
25. Erll, Astrid, and Ansgar Nünning, eds. Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207262
26. Fadeeva, Liubov. “EU-Russia Cultural Relations and Identity Politics.” In The Routledge Handbook of EU-Russia Relations, edited by Tatiana Romanova, Maxine David. Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351006262-33
27. Giesen, Bernhard. Triumph and Trauma. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers. 2004. Lähdesmäki, Tuuli, Luisa Passerini, Sigrid KaasikKrogerus, and Iris van Huis, eds. Dissonant Heritages and Memories in Contemporary Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11464-0.
28. Lähdesmäki, Tuuli, Katja Mäkinen, Viktorija L. A. Čeginskas, and Sigrid Kaasik-Krogerus. Europe from Below: Notions of Europe and the European among Participants in EU Cultural Initiatives. Brill, 2021.
29. Malinova, Olga. “Politics of Memory and Nationalism.” Nationalities Papers 49, no. 6 (November, 2021): 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.87
30. Mälksoo, Maria. “A Baltic Struggle for a “European Memory”: The Militant Mnemopolitics of The Soviet Story.” Journal of Genocide Research 20, no. 4 (2018): 530– 544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2018.1522828
31. Mälksoo, Maria. “The Memory Politics of Becoming European: The East European Subalterns and the Collective Memory of Europe.” European Journal of International Relations 15, no. 4 (December, 2009): 653–680. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354066109345049
32. Müller, Jan-Werner, ed. Memory and Power in Post-War Europe: Studies in the Presence of the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491580
33. Rév, István. “Liberty Square, Budapest: How Hungary Won the Second World War.” Journal of Genocide Research 20, no. 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2018.1522820
34. Spohn, Willfried, and Klaus Eder. Collective Memory and European Identity. London: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259956.
35. Stoicheva, Maria. European Identity. Theoretical Dilemmas and Analytical Approaches. Sofia: Sofia University, 2016.
36. Tapon, Francis. Hidden Europe: What Eastern Europeans Can Teach Us. S.-F.: WonderLearn, 2012.
37. Yuval-Davis, Nira. The Politics of Belonging. Intersectional Contestations. London: Sage, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446251041.
Review
For citations:
Fadeeva L.A. Memory and Identity Politics in the European Union: Related Concepts, Disparate Practices. Journal of International Analytics. 2022;13(3):79-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-79-93
Views:
1078
Email this article 