Constructing an Ideological Discourse of Imaginative Geography in Turkey
https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-130-144
Abstract
The author implements the constructivist approach to study the discourse of imaginary geography and its main concepts based on the analysis of the facts of the discourse – the main ideological texts that form the imaginary geography of Turkey in the 19th-21st centuries, and significant events like the publication of maps. The author considers the imaginative geography as a representative and performative discourse of power connected with historical memory and nation-building. The article demonstrates how Turkey, relying on the Turkic and Islamic ideological dominants, uses the technologies of force (G. Fields). State and media mapping is going along with the construction of architecture in territories inhabited by Turks and Muslims, which is carried out at the state level. The analysis showed that at this stage imaginative geography becomes a tool for promoting Turkey’s national interests not only in the post-Ottoman, but also in the post-Soviet spaces. It justifies Turkey’s active foreign policy and legitimizes it in the eyes of people inhabiting this imaginative geography. The inclusion of a religious component expands this geography to a worldwide reach. Through an imaginative geography, relying on the political ideas of Turkism that developed in the twentieth century and underwent Islamization, Turkey projects a new regional configuration, where its role becomes the leading one. Turkey’s active foreign policy includes maintaining its central position through a set of tools, such as humanitarian policy, constructing an imaginary geography and fixing it through the concepts of “geography-destiny” and “geography of the heart”, visualization through mapping. The author comes to the conclusion that although the example of Turkey in the use of imaginative geography is not unique, it demonstrates an example of the successful implementation of the technologies of force and should be taken into account when developing Russia’s foreign policy strategy.
About the Author
V. V. Tsibenko
Southern Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Veronika V. Tsibenko, PhD in History, Director, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities
344006, Rostov-on-Don, Pushkinskaya street, 140
References
1. Аватков, В.А. Идейно-ценностный фактор во внешней политике Турции // Вестник МГИМО Университета. – 2019. – Т. 12. – № 4. – С. 113–129. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-113-129. Avatkov, Vladimir A. “Ideology and Values in Turkey's Foreign Policy.” MGIMO Review of International Relations 12, no. 4 (2019): 113–129 [In Russian].
2. Ассман, Я. Культурная память: Письмо, память о прошлом и политическая идентичность в высоких культурах древности. – М.: Языки славянской культуры, 2004. – 368 c. Assman, Jan. Cultural Memory and Early Civilization. Writing, Remembrance and Political Imagination. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 2004 [In Russian].
3. Бобровников, В.О. Воображаемая география мусульман колониального Востока: понятия, подходы, проблемы // Новое Прошлое. – 2018. – № 1. – С. 223–235. https://doi.org/10.23683/2500-3224-2018-1-223-235. Bobrovnikov, Vladimir O. “Imagined Geography of Muslims in the Colonial Orient: Language, Approaches, Problems.” The New Past, no. 1 (2018): 223–235 [In Russian].
4. Замятин, Д.Н. Гуманитарная география: пространство, воображение и взаимодействие современных гуманитарных наук // Социологическое обозрение. – 2010. – Т. 9. – № 3. – С. 26–50. Zamyatin, Dmitrii N. “Humanitarian Geography: Space, Imagination, and Interaction between Contemporary Human Sciences.” Sotsiologicheskoe Izmerenie 9, no. 3 (2010): 26–50 [In Russian].
5. Киреев, Н.Г. История Турции. ХХ в. – М.: ИВ РАН, Крафт+, 2007. – 608 с. Kireev, Nikolay. Istoriya Turtsii. ХХ v. Moscow: Kraft+, 2007 [In Russian].
6. Миллер, А. Русификации: Классифицировать и понять // Ab Imperio. – 2002. – № 2. – С. 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2002.0094. Miller, Aleksei. “Russifications: Classified and Explained.” Ab Imperio, no. 2 (2002): 133–148 [In Russian].
7. Саид, Э. Ориентализм. – СПб.: Русский Мир, 2006. – 639 с. Said, Edward. Orientalism. Saint-Petersburg: Russkii Mir, 2006 [In Russian].
8. Чуркин, М.К. Сибирь в «Воображаемой географии»: к вопросу о современном научноисследовательском дискурсе // Вестник Омского университета. Серия «Исторические науки». – 2014. – № 2 (2). – С. 81–85. Churkin, Mikhail K. “Siberia in ‘Imaginary Geography’: The Question of Contemporary Research Discourse.” Herald of Omsk University. Series “Historical studies,” 2, no. 2 (2) (2014): 81–85 [In Russian].
9. Agnew, John. Geopolitics: Re-visioning World Politics. London: Routeledge, 2003.
10. Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London, New York: Verso, 2006.
11. Atsız, Hüseyin N. Türk Ülküsü. İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat, 2017. Atsız, Hüseyin N. Turkish Nation. İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat, 2017 [In Turkish].
12. Bialasiewicz, Luiza, David Campbell, Stuart Elden, Stephen Graham, Alex Jeffrey, and Alison J. Williams. “Performing Security: The Imaginative Geographies of Current US Strategy.” Political Geography 26, no. 4 (May 2007): 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.12.002.
13. Crampton, Jeremy W. “Maps as Social Constructions: Power, Communication and Visualization.” Progress in Human Geography 25, no. 2 (June 1, 2001): 235–52. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201678580494.
14. Dağtekin, Hüseyin. Tarih Atlası. İstanbul: İnkılap, 2010. Dağtekin, Hüseyin. Revolution History Atlas. İstanbul: İnkılap, 2010 [In Turkish].
15. Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2012. Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Strategic Depth: Turkey’s International Position. İstanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2012 [In Turkish].
16. Driver, Felix. “Imaginative Geographies.” In Introducing Human Geographies, edited by Paul Crang, Phil Crang, and Mark Goodwin, 234–248. Routledge, 2013.
17. Erdoğan, Recep T. Daha Adil Bir Dünya Mümkün. Birleşmiş Milletler Reformu İçin Bir Model Önerisi. İstanbul: Turkuvaz Kitap, 2021. Erdoğan, Recep T. A More Just World is Possible. A Model Proposal for United Nations Reform. İstanbul: Turkuvaz Kitap, 2021 [In Turkish].
18. Gary, Fields. “Enclosure Landscapes: Historical Reflections on Palestinian Geography.” Historical Geography 39, (2011): 182–207.
19. Gökalp, Ziya. Kitaplar: Bütün Eserleri – 1. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2007. Gökalp, Ziya. Books Complete Works – 1. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2007 [In Turkish].
20. Özkan, Kenan. “Mütareke Döneminde ‘Milliyet’ Ve ‘Anasır’ Kavramı Üzerine Tartışmalar.” Belgi Dergisi, no. 15 (2018): 694–727. Özkan, Kenan. “Discussions on the Concept of ‘Nationality’ and ‘Anasır’ in the Armistice Period.” Belgi Dergisi, no. 15 (2018): 694–727 [In Turkish].
21. Radcliffe, Sarah A. “Imaginative Geographies, Postcolonialism, and National Identities: Contemporary Discourses of the Nation in Ecuador.” Ecumene 3, no. 1 (January 2, 1996): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/147447409600300102.
22. Robbins, Bruce, Mary Louise Pratt, Jonathan Arac, Rajagopalan Radhakrishnan, and Edward Said. “Edward Said’s Culture and Imperialism: A Symposium.” Social Text, no. 40 (1994): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/466793.
23. Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.
24. Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.
25. Seyfeddin, Ömer. Yarınki Turan Devleti. İstanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 2010. Seyfeddin, Ömer. Tomorrow’s Turan State. İstanbul: Çağrı Yayınları, 2010 [In Turkish].
26. Tolz, Vera. Russia’s Own Orient. Oxford University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199594443.001.0001.
27. “Türklük Bekliyor!” Bozkurt (July 1941): 11–13. “Turkishness is Waiting!” Bozkurt (July 1941): 11–13 [In Turkish].
28. Watkins, Josh. “Spatial Imaginaries Research in Geography: Synergies, Tensions, and New Directions.” Geography Compass 9, no. 9 (September 2015): 508–522. doi:10.1111/gec3.12228. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12228.
29. Williams, Raymond. The Country and the City. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.
30. Yaşlı, Fatih. Türkçü Faşizmden ‘Türk-İslam Ülküsü’ne. İstanbul: Yordam Kitap, 2016. Yaşlı, Fatih. From Turkic Fascism to “Turkish-Islamic Ideology”. İstanbul: Yordam Kitap, 2016 [In Turkish].
Review
For citations:
Tsibenko V.V. Constructing an Ideological Discourse of Imaginative Geography in Turkey. Journal of International Analytics. 2022;13(3):130-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-130-144
Views:
892
Email this article 