Economic Development as a Method of Foreign Policy Risk Compensation: The Case of Armenia

   Throughout a 35-year period, the Armenian economy has withstood numerous crises and political shocks, including the Spitak earthquake, the fi rst Karabakh war, a decline in GDP by over 50 %, transport blockades, and the 2008 economic crisis. The aftermath of the 2020 44-day war in Nagorno-Karabakh introduced new risks and drastically altered the country’s development and economic conditions. Despite the broader context of international confrontation, which has spilled over into military conflict in Ukraine, the Armenian economy has created possibilities for growth under geopolitical uncertainty. In the short-term perspective, these developments have had a positive impact on economic growth in 2022. However, the continuity of such impact on the Armenian economy depends on the government’s concrete approaches and further existence of current conditions. The article aims to explore the interrelationship between Armenia’s foreign policy and economy in the context of global and regional changes. The policy of the Armenian government is considered through the prism of the main features of the notion “small state,” with particular attention paid to the logic of changes in foreign policy throughout the entire period of independence. By utilizing large-scale statistical data, the article presents the causes of the radical growth of Armenia’s GDP in 2022 while simultaneously analyzing its structure. The development of the country’s energetic system is presented as an illustration of the establishment of a separate field that combines export possibilities, investment potential, and risk formation. The article also covers the reasons for the relative stability of the Armenian economy under the background threat of military escalation.

1. Ayvazyan, Sergey A., Bereznyatski, Alexandr N., and Boris E. Brodsky. “ ‘Gollandskaya bolezn’ v ekonomikakh Rossii i Armenii.” Prikladnaya ekonometrika 36, no. 4 (2014): 32–60 [In Russian].

2. Zharkov, Alexey G. “Sel'skoe khozyaistvo.” Armeniya: Problemy Nezavisimogo Razvitiya. Moscow: Russian Institute of Strategic Research, 1998 [In Russian].

3. Mikaeljan, Grant G. Tenevaja jekonomika v Armenii. Yerevan: Institut Kavkaza, 2016.

4. Nechkin, Dmitry A. “Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations.” Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics 10, no. 4 (2018,): 109–137 [In Russian].

5. Novikova, Irina N. “Small States in International Relations: Some Theoretical Aspects”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, no. 15 (3), 2022: 219–242 [In Russian].

6. Podkolzina, Irina A. “Problemy Definitsii i Otsenki Politicheskogo Riska v Zarubezhnykh Issledovaniyakh.” Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta no. 5 (1996): 19–33 [In Russian].

7. Sarkisyan, Hovhannes L., and Norayr A. Dunamalyan. “The Dynamics of Civil Identity Transformation in Modern Armenia: Factors and Subjects.” Polis. Political Studies, no. 2 (2020): 53–72 [In Russian].

8. Smirnov, Vadim A. “Foreign Policy of Baltic States towards Russia.” Modern Europe, no. 5 (2016): 44–54 [In Russian].

9. Khachatryan, Harutyun. “Armeniya: Krizis i Fundamental'nye Problemy Ekonomiki.” Tsentral’naya Aziya i Kavkaz 6, no. 6 (66) (2009): 50–59 [In Russian].

10. Aberg, John H. S., and Aram Terzyan. “Structure or Agency? Explaining Armenia’s Foreign Policy Evolution.” Eastern Journal of European Studies 9 (2018): 151–172.

11. Aghabekyan, Edgar. “Russian-Ukrainian War and the Financial Market of Armenia: Risks and Expectations.” Amberd Bulletin 15, no. 2 (2022): 14–24 [In Armenian]

12. Dunamalyan, Norayr A. “Armenia's Approach to Eurasian Integration.” In Regional Integration and Future Cooperation Initiatives in the Eurasian Economic Union.152–173. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2020. doi: 10.4018/978-1-7998-1950-9.ch009.

13. Bishop, Matthew L. “The Political Economy of Small States: Enduring Vulnerability?” Review of International Political Economy 19 (2012): 942–960. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2011.635118.

14. Galstyan, Narek. “The Main Signs and Reasons for the Small State Foreign Policy Behaviour.” Bulletin of Yerevan State University: International Relations and Political Sciences 29, no. 2 (2019): 3–16. [In Armenian].

15. Galstyan, Narek. “Types of Security Strategies of Small States: Compilation and Opposition.” Bulletin of Yerevan State University: International Relations and Political Sciences 12, no. 3 (2021): 61–70. URL: https://journals.ysu.am/index.php/bulletin-ysu-int-rel-pol/article/view/vol12_no3_2021_pp061-070 [In Armenian].

16. Iskandaryan, Alexander M., Mikaelian, Hrant G., and Sergey M. Minasyan. War, Business and Politics: Informal Networks and Formal Institutions in Armenia. Yerevan: Caucasus Institute, 2016.

17. Mouritzen, H., and A. Wivel. “Introduction.” In The Geopolitics of Euro-Atlantic Iintegration, edited by H. Mouritzen & A. Wivel, 1–11. London: Routledge, 2005.

18. Rothstein, Robert L. Alliances and Small Powers. New York: Columbia University Press, 1968.

19. Keohane, Robert O. “‘Liliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics.” International Organization 23 (1969): 291–310.

20. Thorhallsson, Baldur “The Size of States in the European Union: Theoretical and Conceptual Perspectives.” Journal of European Integration 28, no. 1 (2006): 7–31. doi: 10.1080/07036330500480490.

21. Wivel, Anders, Alyson J. Bailes, and Archer Clive. “Setting the scene: small states and international security.” In Small states and international security: Europe and beyond edited by Clive Archer, Alyson J. Bailes, and Anders Wivel, 3–25. London: Routledge, 2014.