On the Dual International Identity of Contemporary China

Since the beginning of the 21^st century, one of the central research questions for Chinese IR scholars has been the definition, justification and conceptualization of China’s international identity. This was due both to the discussions in the Chinese academic community about China’s peaceful rise, caused by the rapid growth of China’s material power, and to the “constructivist turn” in the development of IR as a discipline in China. Understanding China’s international identity is important not only for China itself as a way of understanding “itself” and “others”, but also for the world community, since the self-positioning of a state reveals its national interests, aspirations, foreign policy strategy and behavior. From the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949 to the end of the 1990s, when analyzing its foreign policy self-positioning, it was always possible to identify a dominant international identity. In the 1950s it was a pronounced international identity of the PRC as a socialist country, in the 1960s–1980s as a third world country, since the 1990s as the largest developing country. However, since the second half of the 1990s, China has started to reveal its identity as a responsible great power while simultaneously maintaining its identity as a developing country. The use of two international identities by China for almost three decades and the intention repeatedly emphasized by the Chinese leadership to maintain self-positioning as a developing country for a long time allow us to conclude that China’s dual international identity is not a reflection of the transition period of China’s development, but represents a complex phenomenon that requires conceptualization. The purpose of this article is to reveal the phenomenon of contemporary China having a dual international identity or, in other words, simultaneously two dominant international identities that determine China’s actions on the global stage. The author intended to reveal, based on an analysis of Chinese academic publications, the Chinese vision of the phenomenon of dual international identity.

1. Kochetkov, Vladimir V. “Identity in International Relations: Characteristics, Role and Ways of Formation.” Bulletin of Moscow University. Seriya. 18. Sociology and political science, no. 2 (2010): 100–114 [In Russian].

2. Leksyutina, Yana. “China, Great Power Responsibilty, and Global Leadership.” International Processes 16, no. 2 (2018): 60–72 [In Russian].

3. Luzyanin, Sergey G., and Mikhail V. Mamonov. “China in Global and Regional Dimensions. Resources and Routes of ‘Rising’.” In China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity. Vol. XVI: annual publication, edited by E.I. Safronova. M.: IFES RAS, 2011 [In Russian].

4. Portyakov, Vladimir Ya. The Formation of China as a Responsible Global Power. Moscow: IFES RAS, 2013 [In Russian].

5. Prokhorenko, Irina. “Foreign Policy Identity.” In Identity: Personality, Society, Politics. Encyclopedic Edition, edited by I.S. Semenenko, 465–469. Moscow: Publishing House “The Whole World”, 2017 [In Russian].

6. Ho, Benjamin Tze Ern. “Chinese Thinking about International Relations. From Theory to Practice.” Asia Policy 14, no. 3 (2019).

7. Men, Honghua. “China’s National Identity in Transition: Domestic and International Perspectives (1982–2012).” Social Sciences in China 35, no. 2 (2014): 189–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2014.900895.

8. Pu, Xiaoyu. “Controversial Identity of a Rising China.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 10, no. 2 (2017): 131–149. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pox004.

9. Qin, Yaqing, “Development of International Relations Theory in China: Progress through Debates.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, no. 11 (2011): 231–257. DOI:10.1093/irap/lcr003.

10. Wang, Jisi. “China in the Middle.” American Interest 10, no. 4 (2015): 1–7.

11. Xu, Jin, and Zheyuan Du. “The Dominant Thinking Sets in Chinese Foreign Policy Research: A Criticism.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 8, no. 3 (2015): 251–729.

12. Yuan, Peng. “China’s strategic choices.” Contemporary International Relations 20. no. 1 (2010): 17–32.

13. Cai, Tuo. “Some Thoughts on Contemporary China’s International Positioning.” Chinese Social Sciences, no. 5 (2010): 121–136 [In Chinese].

14. Chen, Xiang. “Responsible Great Power: China’s New Identity.” World Economic and Political Forum, no. 6 (2016): 33–50 [In Chinese].

15. Jin, Canrong, and Shiqiang Liu. “Sino-US Relations since the Obama Administration.” American Studies, no. 4 (2009) [In Chinese].

16. Li, Boyi. “China’s International Identity under a Century of Major Changes: Change and Stability.” Indian Ocean Economics Research, no. 2 (2021): 35–37 [In Chinese].

17. Li, Daokui. The Rise of a Great Power in Troubled Times: How China Responds to a World in Financial Crisis. Beijing: CITIC Press, 2012 [In Chinese].

18. Luo, Jianbo. “Responsible Developing Power: China’s Identity and Major Power Responsibilities.” West Asia and Africa, no. 5 (2014): 28–45 [In Chinese].

19. Nie, Wenjuan. “China’s Identity and Perception of National Interests In the South China Sea.” Contemporary Asia-Pacific, no. 1 (2017): 139–155 [In Chinese].

20. Qin, Yaqing. “National Identity, Strategic Culture and Security Interests – Three Assumptions about the Relationship between China and the International Community.” World Economy and Politics, no. 1 (2003): 10–15 [In Chinese].

21. Wu, Bing. “Identity and Responsibility: Research on China’s View of International Responsibility.” Socialist Studies, no. 2 (2011): 138–141 [In Chinese].

22. Xia, Jianping. “The Construction of China’s National Identity and Its Peaceful Connotation – a Constructivist Analysis of China’s Peaceful Development.” Socialist Studies, no. 1 (2005): 119–121 [In Chinese].

23. Zhang, Shaodong. “On Xi Jinping’s Triple Positioning of China’s National Identity in the International Order.” Research on Ideological and Political Education 37, no. 5 (2021): 1–6 [In Chinese].

24. Zhong, Feiteng. “China’s Identity Positioning and the Construction of New Relationships Among Developing Countries.” Contemporary World, no. 2 (2019): 23–28 [In Chinese].