Relations between the Scandinavian-Baltic region states and Ukraine: military-political and economic dimensions

The article is devoted to the relations of the Scandinavian-Baltic region states (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden) and Ukraine in the military-political and economic spheres. These countries had engaged in Ukrainian affairs long before 2013−2014. This happened soon after «the Orange Revolution» and, then, the trend became more pronounced during the implementation of the program «Eastern Partnership». The most active actors on the Ukrainian track in their subregions are Sweden (until 2014 — one of the largest investors in its economy) and Lithuania, which in 2015 started to supply lethal weapons to Ukraine. The countries of the Scandinavian-Baltic region provide financial assistance to Ukraine which is symbolic compared to development aid, but considerable for Ukrainian economy. Financing is traditionally directed to promotion of effective public administration, democracy, human rights (including gender equality), systemic economic reforms, sustainable development (including energy efficiency), etc. From a strategic perspective, military cooperation of the Scandinavian-Baltic region countries with Ukraine is nominal as well. Against this background, completely divergent assessment of the situation in Ukraine continues to be the most important stumbling block in the relations between Russia and the states of the region. This does not give any grounds for early softening of their value-based foreign policy towards Russia.

Ukraine, Ukrainian crisis, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, Sweden, Baltic states, Northern European states, ScandinavianBaltic region, Baltic region

1. Zverev Yu. M., Mezhevich N. M. Russia and the Baltic States: Security Scenarios in Time of Political Tensions. Working Paper 35/2016 / Russian International Affairs Council [RIAC]; ch. ed. Igor S. Ivanov. Moscow: RIAC, 2016. 32 p.; Zverev Iu. M., Mezhevich N. M. Rossiia i Pribaltika: stsenarii bezopasnosti v usloviiakh politicheskoi napriazhennosti. Rabochaia tetrad’ №35/2016 / Rossiiskii sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam [RSMD]; gl. red. I. S. Ivanov. – M.: NP RSMD, 2016. 32 s.

2. Kilin Yu. M. Neutral states at the crossroad: the issue of Sweden and Finland’s membership in NATO / Contemporary Europe [Sovremennaya Evropa]. 2017, March-April. № 2 (74). Pp. 65–76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15211/soveurope220176576; Kilin Iu. M. Neitral’nye gosudarstva na rasput’e: problema vstupleniia v NATO Finliandii i Shvetsii / Sovremennaia Evropa. 2017, mart-aprel’. № 2 (74). S. 65–76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.15211/soveurope220176576.

3. Khudoley K. K. The Baltic Sea Region and Increasing International Tension / Baltic region. 2016. Vol. 8. №1. Pp. 7–25. DOI: 10.5922/2074-9848-2016-1-1; Khudolei K. K. Region Baltiiskogo moria v usloviiakh obostreniia mezhdunarodnoi obstanovki / Baltiiskii region. 2016. Tom 8. Nomer 1. S.7–25. DOI: 10.5922/2074-9848-2016-1-1.

4. Betlii O. Foreign Policy Audit: Ukraine-Lithuania. Discussion Paper / Institute of World Policy. Kyiv, 2016. 56 p.

5. Bruge I. Latvia’s Ukraine Policy: the Ukraine Crisis and Bilateral Relations in 2015 // Latvian Foreign and Security Policy Yearbook 2016. Pp. 71–79.

6. Gaidai D., Litra L. Foreign Policy Audit: Ukraine-Sweden / Discussion Paper; Institute of World Policy. Kyiv, 2017. 44 p.