Preview

Journal of International Analytics

Advanced search

The Importance of the Institution of Elections in Germany’s Domestic and Foreign Policy

https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2025-16-4-39-57

Abstract

The article is devoted to the peculiarities of the transformation of the electoral institution in Germany against the backdrop of the development of the concept of a “change of eras” and the tendency towards the growing importance of security issues for Germany’s foreign and domestic policy. The aim of the study is to identify how the German political community perceives elections as an element of Germany’s domestic and foreign policy. For a long time, elections remained an important part of the German state structure, ensuring adherence to its democratic principles. However, the growing complexity of the party structure in (Western) German politics and the gradual erosion of the positions of the “people’s” parties, the CDU / CSU and the SPD, brought to the fore new political forces that came to be seen as a threat to German democracy. While the cooptation of the Eastern German PDS into German politics ultimately proceeded relatively painlessly for the German political system, the electoral successes of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party led to a rise in alarmist sentiments in Germany and the emergence of the “firewall” phenomenon – a boycott of the party by mainstream political forces. The high level of support for opposition parties has sparked a debate about destructive external interference in Germany’s electoral processes. Since the escalation of the Ukrainian crisis in February 2022, the Russian Federation has been almost invariably cited as the source of such interference. At the same time, the German government’s approach to elections in other countries through the prism of a “values-based” foreign policy has provoked crises in bilateral relations, with consequences that extend far beyond those relations. An illustrative example of this approach was the German leadership’s actions regarding the 2020 presidential election in Belarus. Criticism of the electoral processes in Belarus not only undermined the cautious normalization of the bilateral relations in the second half of the 2010s but also became a significant indicator of the escalation of crises in the European security system in the early 2020s, culminating in the escalation of the armed conflict in Ukraine.

About the Authors

A. P. Sokolov
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Artem P. Sokolov, PhD (Hist.), Associate Professor of the Department of Diplomacy, Senior Research Fellow of Institute for International Studies

76, Vernadsky avenue, Moscow, 119454


Competing Interests:

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.



I. M. Avlasenko
Belorussian State University
Belarus

Igor M. Avlasenko, PhD (Hist.), Head of the Department of International Tourism and Hospitality, Associate Professor of the Department of International Relations

4, Nesavisimosty avenue, Minsk, Belarus, 220030


Competing Interests:

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.



References

1. Belov, Vladislav B. “Landtag Elections in Germany As an Indicator of Federal Party and Political Trends.” Analytical Papers of IE RAS, no. 2(30) (2022): 43–51 [In Russian].

2. Boyashov, Anatolii S., Ivan I. Mushket, Oleg N. Leshenyuk, Roman A. Amburtsev, Sergei G. Karavaev, and Aleksandr N. Ksendzov. Bezopasnost izbiratelnogo protsessa. Saint Petersburg: Sekretariat Soveta MPA SNG, 2023 [In Russian].

3. Vasiliev, Viktor I. “Finding Government Alliance in Germany.” Observer, no. 11(382) (2021): 40–58 [In Russian].

4. Winkler, Heinrich A. Weimar 1918–1933: The History of the First German Democracy. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2013 [In Russian].

5. Pavlov, Nikolai V. “Germany after Merkel (Whether to Wait for Changes in the Foreign Policy of Germany?).” Polis. Political Studies, no. 6 (2019): 22–35 [In Russian].

6. Okuneva, Lyudmila S., and Aleksandr I. Tevdoi-Burmuli, eds. Pravyi populizm: global’nyi trend i regional’nye osobennosti. Moscow: MGIMO-University, 2020 [In Russian]

7. Khorolskaya, Maria V. “The Main German Parties Ahead of the 2021 Bundestag Elections.” World Economy and International Relations 65, no. 9 (2021): 25–33 [In Russian].

8. Ackermann, Kathrin, Martin Elff, and Heiko Giebler. “The Federal Election 2021: Germany at the Crossroads?” Electoral Studies 86 (2023): 102697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102697.

9. Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.

10. Lilleker, Darren G, and Nigel A. Jackson. Political Campaigning, Elections and the Internet. London: Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203829431.

11. Graefe, Andreas. “Accuracy of German Federal Election Forecasts, 2013 & 2017.” International Journal of Forecasting 35, no. 3 (2019): 868–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.01.004.

12. Heddesheimer, Vincent, Hanno Hilbig, Florian Sichart, and Andreas Wiedemann. “GERDA: The German Election Database.” Scientific Data 12, no. 1 (2025): 618. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04811-5.

13. Holtkamp, Lars, Benjamin Garske, and Elke Wiechmann. “Die Wahl von Bürgermeister_innen in Deutschland – Ursachen der Unterrepräsentanz von Frauen.” Gender 12, no. 1 (2020): 127–145. https://doi.org/10.3224/gender.v12i1.09.

14. Holtkamp, Lars, Benjamin Garske, and Elke Wiechmann. “The Election of Mayors in Germany – Causes of Underrepresentation of Women.” Gender 12, no. 1 (2020): 127–145 [In German].

15. Jungherr, Andreas. “Four Functions of Digital Tools in Election Campaigns: The German Case.” The International Journal of Press / Politics 21, no. 3 (2016): 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642597.

16. Klein, Markus, Wolfgang Jagodzinski, Ekkehard Mochmann, and Dieter Ohr, eds. 50 Jahre Empirische Wahlforschung in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90180-4.

17. Klein, Markus, Wolfgang Jagodzinski, Ekkehard Mochmann, and Dieter Ohr, eds. 50 Years of Empirical Electoral Research in Germany. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2000 [In German].

18. Norpoth, Helmut, and Thomas Gschwend. “The Chancellor Model: Forecasting German Elections.” International Journal of Forecasting 26, no. 1 (2010): 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2009.02.008.

19. Rattinger, Hans, and Jürgen Krämer. “Wahlnorm Und Wahlbeteiligung in Der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Eine Kausalanalyse.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 36, no. 2 (1995): 267–285. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24198704.

20. Rattinger, Hans, and Jürgen Krämer. “Electoral Norm and Voter Turnout in the Federal Republic of Germany: A Causal Analysis.” Political Quarterly 36, no. 2 (1995): 267–285 [In German].

21. Spier, Tim. “Die Wahl von Rechtsaußenparteien in Deutschland.” In: Handbuch Rechtsextremismus, edited by Fabian Virchow, Martin Langebach, and Alexander Häusler, 257–284. Wiesbaden: Springer VS Wiesbaden, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19085-3_10.

22. Spier, Tim. “The Election of Far-Right Parties in Germany.” In: Handbook of Right-Wing Extremism, edited by Fabian Virchow, Martin Langebach, and Alexander Häusler, 257–284. Wiesbaden: Springer VS Wiesbaden, 2016 [In German].

23. Stoffel, Michael F., and Ulrich Sieberer. “Measuring Re-Election Prospects across Electoral Systems: A General Approach Applied to Germany.” West European Politics 41, no 5(2017): 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1400273.


Review

For citations:


Sokolov A.P., Avlasenko I.M. The Importance of the Institution of Elections in Germany’s Domestic and Foreign Policy. Journal of International Analytics. 2025;16(4):39-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2025-16-4-39-57

Views: 282

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2587-8476 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9633 (Online)